Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing tliis resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for in forming people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at |http: //books .google .com/I
'O..II
i->-'^&- 3-i;^i,y
THE CROWD.
The
CRIMINOLOOY SERIES.
In large Crown Bvo, Cloth, 6s. each.
z. The Female Offender. By Professor Lombroso.
Edited, with Introduction, l^ W. Douglas Mor-
rison. Illustrated.
a. Crimuial Sociology. By Professor Enrico
Ferri.
3. Juvenile Offenders. By W. Douglas Morrison.
London : T. FISHER UNWIN.
THE CROWD
A STUDY OF THE POPULAR MIND
GU STAVE LE BON
NEW YORK
THE MACMILLAN CO.
1896
S^MJOPo
PREFACE.
The following work is devoted to an account of
the characteristics of crowds.
The whole of the common characteristics with
which heredity endows the individuals of a race
constitute the genius of the race. When, however,
a certain number of these individuals are gathered
together in a crowd for purposes of action, observa-
tion proves that, from the mere fact of their being
assembled, there result certain new psychological
characteristics, which are added to the racial cha-
racteristics and differ from them at times to a very
considerable degree.
Organised crowds have always played an impor-
tant part in the life of peoples, but this part has
never been of such moment as at present. The
substitution of the unconscious action of crowds
for the conscious activity of individuals is one of
the principal characteristics of the present age.
I have endeavoured to examine the difficult pro-
blem presented by crowds in a purely scientific
manner — that is, by making an effort to proceed
with method, and without being influenced by
vi PREFACE.
opinions, theories, and doctrines. This, I believe,
is the only mode of arriving at the discovery of
some few particles of truth, especially when dealing,
as is the case here, with a question that is the sub-
ject of impassioned controversy. A man of science
bent on verifying a phenomenon is not called upon
to concern himself with the interests his verifications
may hurt. In a recent publication an eminent
thinker, M. Goblet d'Alviela, made the remark
that, belonging to none of the contemporary schools,
I am occasionally found in opposition of sundry
of the conclusions of all of them. I hope this new
work will merit a similar observation. To belong
to a school is necessarily to espouse its prejudices
and preconceived opinions.
Still I should explain to the reader why he will
find me draw conclusions from my investigations
which it might be thought at first sight they do not
bear ; why, for instance, after noting the extreme
mental inferiority of crowds, picked assemblies
included, I yet affirm it would be dangerous to
meddle with their organisation, notwithstanding
this inferiority.
The reason is, that the most attentive observa-
tion of the facts of history has invariably demon-
strated to me that social organisms being every
whit as complicated as those of all beings, it is in
no wise in our power to force them to undergo on
a sudden far-reaching transformations. Nature has
PREFACE. vii
recourse at times to radical measures, but never after
our fashion, which explains how it is that notitun&'-
is more fatal to a people tha n the mania for rreat '^^^^'^-^^
pear theoreti cally . They would only be useful
were it possible to change instantaneously the
genius of nations. This power, however, is only
possessed by time. Men are ruled by ideas, senti-
ments, and customs — matters which are of the
essence of ourselves. Institutions and laws are
the outward manifestation of our character, the
expression of its needs. Being its outcome, insti-
tutions and laws cannot change this character.
The study of social phenomena cannot be sepa-
rated from that of the peoples among whom they
have come into existence. From the philosophic
point of view these phenomena may have an abso-
lute value ; in practice they have only a relative
value.
It is necessary, in consequence, when studying a
social phenomenon, to consider it successively
under two very different aspects. It will then be
seen that the teachings of pure reason are very
often contrary to those of practical reason. There
are scarcely any data, even physical, to which this
distinction is not applicable. From the point of
view of absolute truth a cube or a circle are invariable
geometrical figures, rigorously defined by certain
formulas. From the point of view of the impres-
viii PREFACE.
sion they make on our eye these geometrical
figures may assume very varied shapes. By per-
spective the cube may be transformed into a pyra-
mid or a square, the circle into an elapse or a
straight line. Moreover, the consideration of these
fictitious shapes is far more important than that of
the real shapes, for it is they and they alone that
we see and that can be reproduced by photography
or in pictures. In certain cases there is more trutfi
in the unreal than in the real. To present objects
with their exact geometrical forms would be to J
distort nature and render it unrecognisable. If we
imagine a world whose inhabitants could only copy
or photograph objects, but were unable to touch
them, it would be very difficult for such persons to
attain to an exact idea of their form. Moreover,
the knowledge of this form, accessible only to a
small number of learned men, would present but a
very minor interest.
The philosopher who studies social phenomena s
should bear in mind that side by side with their [
theoretical value they possess a practical value, and
that this latter, so far as the evolution of civilisation
is concerned, is alone of importance. The recogni-
tion of this fact should render him very circumspect
with regard to the conclusions that logic would
seem at first to enforce upon him.
There are other motives that dictate to him a
like reserve. The complexity of social facts is
PREFACE. ix
such, that it is impossible to grasp them as a whole
and to foresee the effects of their reciprocal influ-
ence. It seems, too, that behind the visible facts
are hiddSi at times thousands of invisible causes.
Visible social phenomena appear to be the result
of an immense, unconscious working, that as a rule
is beyond the reach of our analysis. Perceptible
phenomena may be compared to the waves, which
are the expression on the surface of the ocean of
deep-lying disturbances of which we know nothing.
So far as the majority of their acts are considered,
crowds display a singularly inferior mentality ;
yet there are other acts in which they appear to be
guided by those mysterious forces which the
ancients denominated destiny, nature, or providence,
which we call the voices of the dead, and whose
power it is impossible to overlook, although we
ignore their essence. It would seem, at times, as
if there were latent forces in the inner being of
nations which serve to guide them. What, for
instance, can be more complicated, more logical,
more marvellous than a language? Yet whence
can this admirably organised production have
arisen, except it be the outcome of the unconscious "^
genius of crowds ? The most learned academics,
the most esteemed grammarians can do no more
than note down the laws that govern languages ;
they would be utterly incapable of creating them.
Even with respect to the ideas of great men
\
\
e^ X PREFACE.
/ ^ we ^. ^. .he. are e,c>„.v.„ «» off-
^
Spring of their brains ? No doubt such ideas are
always created by solitary minds, but is it not the
genius of crowds that has furnished the thousands
of grains of dust forming the soil in which they
have sprung up ?
Crowds, doubtless, are always unconscious, but ^
this very unconsciousness is perhaps one of the )
secrets of their strength. In the natural world /
beings exclusively governed by instinct accomplish 1
acts whose marvellous complexity astounds us. |
Reason is an attribute of humanity of too recent ')
date and still too imperfect to reveal to us the laws (
of the unconscious, and still more to take its place.
The part played by the unconscious in all our acts
is immense, and that played by reason very small.
The unconscious acts like a force still unknown.
If we wish, then, to remain within the narrow but
safe limits within which science can attain to know-
ledge, and not to wander in the domain of vague
conjecture and vain hypothesis, all we must do is
simply to take note of such phenomena as are
accessible to us, and confine ourselves to their con-
sideration. Every conclusion drawn from our
observation is, as a rule, premature, for behind
the phenomena which we see clearly are other
phenomena that we see indistinctly, and perhaps
behind these latter, yet others which we do not see
at all.
CONTENTS.
INTRODUCTION.
THE ERA OF CROWDS.
BOOK I.
THE MIND OF CROWDS,
CHAPTER. I. PAGE
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS — ^PSYCHO-
LOGICAL LAW OF THEIR MENTAL UNITY ... I
CHAPTER II.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS ... 1 6
CHAPTER III.
THE IDEAS, REASONING POWER, AND IMAGINATION
OF CROWDS 47
CHAPTER IV.
A RELIGIOUS SHAPE ASSUMED BY ALL THE CON-
VICTIONS OF CROWDS 62
BOOK II.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
CHAPTER I.
REMOTE FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS
OF CROWDS ... ... ... ... ... 70
xi
xii CONTENTS.
CHAPTER II. PAOK
THE IMMEDIATE FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF
CROWDS... ... ... ... ... ... 98
CHAPTER III. ^
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS AND THEIR MEANS OF
PERSUASION 117
CHAPTER IV.
LIMITATIONS OF THE VARIABILITY OF THE BELIEFS
AND OPINIONS OF CROWDS I47
BOOK III.
THE CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF THE
DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
CHAPTER I.
THE CLASSIFICATION OF CROWDS 1^4
CHAPTER II.
CROWDS TERMED CRIMINAL CROWDS 171
CHAPTER IIL
CRIMINAL JURIES 178
CHAPTER IV.
ELECTORAL CROWDS .. 189
CHAPTER V.
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES 203
INTRODUCTION.
THE ERA OF CROWDS,
The evolution of the present age — ^The great changes in
civilisation are the consequence of changes in Na-
tional thought — Modern belief in the power pf
crowds — It transforms the traditional policy of the
European states — How the rise of the popular classes
comes about, and the manner in which they exercise
their power — The necessary consequences of the
power of the crowd — Crowds unable to play a part
other than destructive — The dissolution of worn-out
civilisations is the work of the crowd — General igno-
rance of the psychology of crowds — Importance of
the study of crowds for legislators and statesmen.
The great upheavals which precede changes of
civilisation, such as the fall of the Roman Empire
and the foundation of the Arabian Empire, seem
at first sight determined more especially by poli-
tical transformations, foreign invasion, or the over-
throw of dynasties: But a more attentive study of
these events shows that behind their apparent
causes the real cause is generally seen to be a
xiii
XIV INTRODUCTION,
profound modification in the ideas of the peoples.
The true historical upheavals are not those which
astonish us by their grandeur and violence. The
only important changes whence the renewal of
civilisations results, affect ideas, conceptions, and
beliefs. The memorable events of history are the
visible effects of the invisible changes of human
thought. The reason these great events are so
rare is that there is nothing so stable in a race as
the inherited groundwork of its thoughts.
The present epoch is one of these critical mo-
ments in which the thought of mankind is under-
going a process of transformation.
Two fundamental factors are at the base of this
transformation. The first is the destruction of
those religious, political, and social beliefs in
which all the elements of our civilisation are
rooted. The second is the creation of entirely
new conditions of existence and thought as the
result of modem scientific and industrial dis-
coveries.
The ideas of the past, although half destroyed, ^
being still very powerful, and the ideas which are '
to replace them being still in process of formation,
the modem age represents a period of transition
ami anatx:hy.
V/ It is not easy to say as yet what will one day be
evolved from this necessarily somewhat chaotic
period. What will be the fundamental ideas on
*w
«
INTRODUCTION. xv
which the societies that are to succeed our own
will be built up? We do not at present know.
Still it is already clear that on whatever lines \
the societies of the future are organised, they )
will have to count with a new power, with the ;
last surviving sovereign force of modem times, }
the power of crowds. On the ruins of so ^
many ideas formerly considered beyond discussion,
and to-day decayed or decaying, of so many
sources of authority that successive revolutions
have destroyed, this power, which alone has arisen
in their stead, seems soon destined to absorb the
others. While all our ancient beliefs are tottering
and disappearing, while the old pillars of society
are giving way one by one, the power of the crowd
is the only force that nothing menaces, and of
which the prestige is continually on the increase.
The age we are about to enter will in truth be the
ERA OF CROWDS.
r
Scarcely a century ago the traditional policy of
European states and the rivalries of sovereigns
were the principal factors that shaped events. The
opinion of the masses scarcely counted, and most
frequently indeed did not count at all. To-day it
is the traditions which used to obtain in politics,
and the individual tendencies and rivalries of
rulers which do not count ; while, on the contrary,
the voice of the masses has become preponderant
It is this voice that dictates their conduct to kings,
9 t
xvi INTRODUCTION,
whose endeavour is to take note of its utterances.
The destinies of nations are elaborated at present
in the heart of the masses, and no longer in the
councils of princes.
The entry of the popular classes into political life
— that is to say, in reality, their progressive trans-
formation into governing classes — is one of the most
striking characteristics of our epoch of transition.
The introduction of universal suffrage, which exer-
cised for a long time but little influence, is not, as
might be thought, the distinguishing feature of this
transference of political power. The progressive
growth of the power of the masses took place at
first by the propagation of certain ideas, which
have slowly implanted themselves in men's minds,
and afterwards by the gradual association of in-
dividuals bent on bringing about the realisation of
theoretical conceptions. It is by association that
crowds have come to procure ideas with respect to
their interests which are very clearly defined if not
particularly just, and have arrived at a consciousness
of their strength. The masses are founding syndi-
cates before which the authorities capitulate one
*
after the other; they are also founding labour unions,
which in spite of all economic laws tend to regulate
the conditions of labour and wages. They return
to assemblies in which the Government is vested,
representatives utterly lacking initiative and inde-
pendence, and reduced most often to nothing else
INTRODUCTION, xvii
than the spokesmen of the committees that have
chosen them.
To-day the claims of the masses are becoming
more and more sharply defined, and amount to
nothing less than a determination to utterly destroy
society as it now exists, with a view to making
it hark back to that primitive communism which
was the normal condition of all human grroups
before the dawn of civilisation. Limitations of the
hours of labour, the nationalisation of mines, rail-
ways, factories, and the soil, the equal distribution
of all products, the elimination of all the upper
classes for the benefit of the popular classes, &c.>
such are these claims.
Little adapted to reasoning, crowds, on the con- 7
trary, are quick to act As the result of their ^
present organisation their strength has become
immense. The dogmas whose birth we are wit-
nessing will soon have the force of the old dogmas ;
that is to say, the tyrannical and sovereign force of
being above discussion. The divine right of the
masses is about to replace the divine right of
kings.
The writers who enjoy the favour of our middle
classes, those who best represent their rather narrow
ideas, their somewhat prescribed views, their rather
superficial scepticism, and their at times somewhat
excessive egoism, display profound alarm at this
new power which they see growing; and to combat
xviii INTRODUCTION.
the disorder in men's minds they are addressing
despairing appeals to those moral forces of the
Church for which they formerly professed so much
disdain. They talk to us of the bankruptcy of
science, go back in penitence to Rome, and re-
mind us of the teachings of revealed truth.
These new converts forget that it is too late. Had
they been really touched by grace, a like operation
could not have the same influence on minds less
concerned with the preoccupations which beset
these recent adherents to religion. The masses
repudiate to-day the gods which their admonishers
repudiated yesterday and helped to destroy.
There is no power, Divine or human, that can
oblige a stream to flow back to its source.':?^ _
There has been no bankruptcy of science, andou ^/^
science has had no share in the present intellectual
anarchy, nor in the making of the new power
which is springing up in the midst of this anarchy.
Science promised us truth, or at least a knowledge
of such relations as our intelligence can seize : it
never promised us peace or happiness. Sovereignly
indifferent to our feelings, it is deaf to our lamen-
tations. It is for us to endeavour to live with
science, since nothing can bring back the illusions
it has destroyed.
Universal symptoms, visible in all nations, show
us the rapid growth of the power of crowds,
and do not admit of our supposing that it is
INTRODUCTION. idx
destined to cease growing at an early date.
Whatever fate it may reserve for us, we shall have
to submit to it. All reasoning against it is a mere
vain war of words. Certainly it is possible that
the advent to power of the masses marks one of
the last stages of Western civilisation, a complete
return to those periods of confused anarchy which
seem always destined to precede the birth of every
new society. But may this result be prevented ?
Up to now these .thoroughgoing destructions of
a worn-out civilisation have constituted the most
obvious task of the masses. It is not indeed
to-day merely that this can be traced. History
tells us, that from the moment when the moral
forces on which a civilisation rested have lost their
strength, its final dissolution is brought about
by those unconscious and brutal crowds known,
justifiably enough, as barbarians. Civilisations as
yet have only been created and directed by a
small intellectual aristocracy, never by crowds.
Crowds are only powerful for destruction. --Theit-
rule is always tantamount to a barbarian phase. A
civilisation involves fixed rules, discipline, a passing
from the instinctive to the rational state, forethought
for the future, an elevated degree of culture — all of
them conditions that crowds, left to themselves, have
invariably shown themselves incapable of realising.
In consequence of the purely destructive nature of
their power crowds act like those microbes which
v^
n INTRODUCTION.
hasten the dissolution of enfeebled or dead bodies.
When the structure of a civilisation is rotten, it is
always the masses that bring about its downfall.
It is at such a juncture that their chief mission is
plainly visible, and that for a while the philosophy
of number seems the only philosophy of history.
Is the same fate in store for our civilisation ?
There is ground to fear that this is the case, but
we are not as yet in a position to be cettain of it
However this may be, we are bound to resign
ourselves to the reign of the masses, since want
of foresight has in succession overthrown all
the barriers that might have kept the crowd in
check.
We have a very slight knowledge of these
crowds which are beginning to be the object of
so much discussion. Professional students of psy-
chology, having lived far from them, have always
ignored them, and when, as of late, they have
^ turned their attention in this direction it has only
i been to consider the crimes crowds are capable of
committing. Without a doubt criminal crowds
exist, but virtuous and heroic crowds, and crowds
of many other kinds, are also to be met with. The
crimes of crowds only constitute a particular phase
of their psychology. The mental constitution of
crowds is not to be learnt merely by a study of
their crimes, any more than that of an individual
by a mere description of his vices.
INTRODUCTION. xxi
•
However, in point of fact, all the world's masters,
all the founders of religions or empires, the
apostles of all beliefs, eminent statesmen, and, in
a more modest sphere, the mere chiefs of small
groups of men have always been unconscious psy-
chologists, possessed of an instinctive and often
very sure knowledge of the character of crowds,
and it is their accurate knowledge of this character
that has enabled them to so easily establish their
mastery. Napoleon had a marvellous insight into
the psychology of the masses of the country over
which he reigned, but he, at times, completely mis-
understood the psychology of crowds belonging to
other races ; ' and it is because he thus misunder-
stood it that he engaged in Spain, and notably in
Russia, in conflicts in which his power received
blows which were destined within a brief space of
time to ruin it A knowledge of the psychology of
crowds is to-day the last resource of the statesman
who wishes not to govern them — that is becoming
a very difficult matter — but at any rate not to be
too much governed by them.
It is only by obtaining some sort of insight into
the psychology of crowds that it can be under-
* His most subtle advisers, moreover, did not understand
this psychology any better. Talle)rrand wrote him that
"Spain would receive his soldiers as liberators." It re-
ceived them as beasts of prey. A psychologist acquainted
with the hereditary instincts of the Spanish race would
have easily foreseen this reception.
wdi INTRODUCTION. '
stood how slight is the action upon them of laws J
and institutions, how powerless they are to hold ^'
any opinions other than those which are imposedv^
upon them, and that it is not with rules based on
theories of pure equity that they are to be led, but
by seeking what produces an impression on them
and what seduces them. For instance, should a
legislator, ' wishing to impose a new tax, choose
that which would be theoretically the most just ?
By no means. In practice the most unjust may be
the best for the masses. Should it at the same
time be the least obvious, and apparently the least
burdensome, it will be the most easily tolerated. It is
for this reason that an indirect tax, however exor-
bitant it be, will always be accepted by the crowd,
because, being paid daily in fractions of a farthing
on objects of consumption, it will not interfere
with the habits of the crowd, and will pass unper-
ceived. Replace it by a proportional tax on wages
or income of any other kind, to be paid in a
lump sum, and were this new imposition theoreti-
cally ten times less burdensome than the other,
it would give rise to unanimous protest. This
arises from the fact that a sum relatively high,
which will appear immense, and will in conse-
quence strike the imagination, has been substi-
tuted for the unperceived fractions of a farthing.
The new tax would only appear light had it been
saved farthing by farthing, but this economic pro-
^^ig *. — - ^ ^ Aount ot foresight of which
the masses are IncapaMe.
The example which precedes is of the simplest.
Its appositeness will be easily perceived. It did not
escape the attention of such a psychologist as
Napoleon, but our modem legislators, ignorant as
they are of the characteristics of a crowd, are
unable to appreciate it. Experience has not
taught them as yet to a sufficient degree that men
never shape their conduct upon the teaching of
pmie reason.
j^Many other practical applications might be made
of the psychology of crowds. A knowledge of
this science throws the most vivid light on a great
number of historical and economic phenomena
totally incomprehensible without it. I shall have
occasion to show that the reason why the most
remarkable of modern historians, Taine, has at
times so imperfectly understood the events of the
great French Revolution is, that it never occurred
to him to study the genius of crowds. He took as
his guide in the study of this complicated period
the descriptive method resorted to by naturalists ;
but the moral forces are almost absent in the case]
of the phenomena which naturalists have to study. \
Yet it is precisely these forces that constitute the
true mainsprings of history.
In consequence, merely looked at from its prac-
tical side, the study of the psychology of crowds
xxiv INTRODUCTION.
deserved to be attempted. Were its interest that
resulting from pure curiosity only, it would still
merit attention. It is as interesting to decipher
the motives of the actions of men as to determine
the characteristics of a mineral or a plant. Our
study of the genius of crowds can merely be a
brief synthesis, a simple summary of our investi-
gations. Nothing more must be demanded of
it than a few suggestive views. Others will work
the ground more thoroughly. ^ To-day we only
touch the surface of a still almost virgin soil.
BOOK I.
THE MIND OF CROWDS.
CHAPTER I.
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS. —PYSCHO^
LOGICAL LAW OF THEIR MENTAL UNITY.
What constitutes a crowd from the psychological point of
view — ^A numerically strong agglomeration of indi-
viduals does not suffice to form a crowd — Special charac-
teristics of psychological crowds — ^The turning in a
fixed direction of the ideas and sentiments of individuals
composing such a crowd, and the disappearance of their
personality — ^The crowd is always dominated by con-
siderations of which it is unconscious — ^The disap-
pearance of brain activitjr and the predominance of
medullar activity — ^The lowering of the intelligence
and the complete transformation of the sentiments—.-
The transformed sentiments may be better or worse
than those of the individuals of which the crowd is
composed — A crowd is as easily hertoic as criminal.
In Its ordinary sense the word " crowd '* means a
gathering of individuals of whatever nationality,
profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances
that have brought them together. From the
psychojilijcal point of view the expression
2 I
2 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
" crowd " assumes quite a difTerent significa-
tion. Under certain given circumstances, and
only under those circumstances, an agglomera-
tion of men presents new characteristics very
different from those of the individuals composing
it. The sentiments and ideas of all the persons)
in the gathering take one and the same direction, \
and their conscious personality vanishes. A col-
lective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but
presenting very clearly Afined characteristics.
The gathering has thus become what, in the
absence of a better expression, I will call an
organised crowd, or, if the term is considered ^
preferable, a psychological crowd. It forms a
Ny \ single being, and is subjected to the /aw of the
mental unity of crowds. ^
is
It is evident th^t it is not by the mere fact of ,/
a number of individuals finding themselves acci-
dentally side by side that they acquire the
character of an organised crowd. A thoiiand
individuals accidentally gathered in a public place
without any determined object in no way consti-
tute a crowd from the psychological point of view.
To acquire the special characteristics of such a
crowd, the influence is necessary of certain pre-
disposing causes of which we shall have to deter-
mine the nature. J"
The disappearance of conscious personality and j
the turning of feelings and thoughts ii^^Miefinite
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS. 3
direction, which are the primary characteristics oH f^
a crowd about to become organised, do not always /
involve the simultaneous presence of a nilmber of
individuals on one spot Thousands of isolated
individuals may acquire at certain moments, and
under the influence of certain violent emotions —
such, for example, as a great national, event — the
characteristics of a psychological crowd. It will
be sufficient in that c^se that a mere chance should
bring them together for their acts to at once assume
the characteristics peculiar to the acts of a crowd.
At certain moments half a dozen men might con-
stitute a psychological crowd, which may not happen •
in the case of hundreds of men gathered together
by accident. On the other hand, an entire nation,
though there may be %> visible agglomeration,
may become a crowd under the action of certain
influences.
^ psychological crowd once constituted, it
acquires certain provisional but determinable
general characteristics. To these general charac-
teristics there are adjoined particular characteristics
which vary according to the elements of which the
crowd is composed, and may modify its mental
constitution. Psychological crowds, then, are sus-
ceptible of classification ; and when we come to
occupy ourselves with this matter, we shall see that
a heter^«ieous crowd — that is, a crowd composed
of disJ^^ar elements — presents certain charac--
4 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
teristics in common with homogeneous crowds —
that is, with crowds composed of elements more or
less akin (sects, castes, and classes) — and side by
side with these common characteristics particulari-
ties which permit of the two kinds of crowds being
differentiated.
But before occupying ourselves with the different
categories of crowds, we must first of all examine
the characteristics common t^ them all. We shall
set to work like the naturalist, who begins by
describing the general characteristics common to
all the members of a family before concerning him-
self with the particular characteristics which allow
the differentiation of the genera and species that
the family includes.
It is not easy to des^ibe the mind of crowds
with exactness, because its organisation varies not
only according to race and composition, but also
according to the nature and intensity of the ^ex-
citing causes to which crowds are subjected. The
same difficulty, however, presents itself in the
psychological study of an individual. It is only
in novels that individuals are found to traverse
their whole life with an unvarying character. It is
only the uniformity of the environment that creates
the apparent uniformity of characters. I have
shown elsewhere that all mental constitutions
contain possibilities of character which^^ay be
manifested in consequence of a sudden^pknge of
\
\
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS. 5
environment. This explains how it was that among
the most savage members of the French Con-
vention were to be found inoffensive citizens who, '
under ordinary circumstances, would have been
peaceable notaries or virtuous magistrates. The
storm past, they resumed their normal character
of quiet, law-abiding citizens. Napoleon found
amongst them his most docile servants.
It being impossible to study here all the succes-
sive degrees of organisation of crowds, we shall
concern ourselves more especially with such crowds
as have attained to the phase of compl ete organic
sation . In this way we shall see what crowds
may become, but not what they invariably are.
It is only in this advanced phase of organisa-^
tion that certain new and special characteristics (
are superposed on the unvarying and domi- I
* nant character of the race ; then takes place
that turning already alluded to of all the feelings
and thoughts of the collectivity in an identical
direction. It is only under such circumstances,
too, that what I have called above the psychological
law of the mental unity of crowds comes into
play.
Among the psychological ch aracte ristics of
crowds there are some that they may present in
common with isolated individuals, and others, on
the contrary, which are absolutely peculiar to them
and are only to be met with in collectivities. It is
i
6 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
these special characteristics that we shall study,
first of all, in order to show their importance.
The most striking peculiarity presented by a
psychological crowd is the following : Whoever be
the individuals that compose it, however like or
unlike be their mode of life, their occupations, their
character, or their intelligence, the fact that they
have been transformed into a crowd puts them in
possession of a sort of collective mind which makes
them feel, think, and act in a manner quite different
from that in which each individual of them would
feel, think, and act were he in a state of isolation.
There are certain ideas and feelings which do not '>
come into being, or do not transform themselves ;
into acts except in the case of individuals forming
a crowd. The psychological crowd is a provisional ' y
\ being formed of heterogeneous elements, which for •
a moment are combined, exactly am^he cells whi(;h^
'constitute a living body form by their reunion a
new being which displays characteristics very
different from those possessed by each of the cells
singly.
Contrary to an opinion which one is astonished
to find coming from the pen of so acute a philo-
sopher as Herbert Spencer, in the aggregate which
constitutes a crowd there is in no sort a summing-
up of or an average struck between its elements.
What really takes place is a combination followed
by the creation of new characterfstics, just as in
\
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS, 7
chemistry certain elements, when brought into
contact — ^bases and acids, for example — combine
to form a new body possessing properties quite
different from those of the bodies that have served
to form it.
It is easy to prove how much the individual
forming part of a crowd differs from the isolated
individual, but it is less easy to discover the causes
of this difference.
To obtain at any rate a glimpse of them it is
necessary in the first place to call to mind the
truth established by modern psychology, that un-
conscious phenomena play an altogether prepon-
derating part not only in organic life, but also in the
operations of the intelligence. The conscious life
of the mind is of small importance in comparison
with its unconscious life. The most subtle analyst,
the most acute observer, is scarcely successful in
discovering more than a very small number
of the unconscious motives that determine his*
conduct. Our conscious acts are the outcome
of an unconscious substratum created in the mind
in the main by hereditary influences. This
substratum consists of the innumerable common
characteristics handed down from generation toi
generation, which constitute the genius of a race.|
Behind the avowed causes of our acts there un-
doubtedly lie secret causes that we do not avow,
but behind these secret causes there are many
/ /
8 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
Others more secret still which we ourselves ignore.
The greater part of our daily actions are the result
of hidden motives which escape our observation.
It is more especially with respect to those un-
j conscious elements which constitute the genius
of a race that all the individuals belonging to it
resemble each other, while it is principally in
respect to the conscious elements of their character
— the fruit of education, and yet more of excep-
tional hereditary conditions — that they differ from
each other. Men the most unlike in the matter
of their intelligence possess instincts, passions, and
feelings that are very similar. In the case of every-
thing that belongs to the realm of sentiment —
, religion, politics, morality, the affections and anti-
1 pathies, &c. — the most eminent men seldom sur-
pass the standard of the most ordinary individuals.
From the intellectual point of view an abyss may
(exist between a great mathematician and his boot-
maker, but from the point of view of character the
difference is most often slight or non-existent J
It is precisely these general qualities of character, \
governed by forces of which we are unconscious, '
and possessed by the majority of the normal indi-
viduals of a race in much the same degree — it is
precisely these qualities, I say, that in crowds
become common propiprty. In the collective mind
the intellectual aptitudes of the individuals, and in
consequence their individuality, are weakened. The
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS. 9
heterogeneous is swamped by the homogeneous,
and the unconscious qualities obtain the upper
hand.
This very fact that crowds possess in common )
ordinary qualities explains why they can never ij
accomplish acts demanding a high degree of intelli- ^
gence. The decisions affecting matters of general
interest come to by an assembly of men of distinc-
tion, but specialists in different walks of life, are 1
not sensibly superior to the decisions that would/
be adopted by a gathering of i mbec iles. The truth! '
is, they can only bring to bear in common on the/
work in hand those mediocre qualities which are(
the birthright of every average individual. In
crowds it is stupidity and not mother-wit that is
accumulated. It is not all the world, as is so often
repeated, that has more wit than Voltaire, but
assuredly Voltaire that has more wit than all the
world, if by "all the world" crowds are to be
understood.
If the individuals of a crowd confined themselves .
to putting in common the ordinary qualities ot
which each of them has his share, there would \
merely result the striking of an average, and not, \l
as we have said is actually the case, the creation of I
new characteristics. How is it that these new l\
characteristics are created? This is what we are I \
now to investigate. ^
Different causes determine the appearance of
lo THE MIND OF CROWDS.
these characteristics peculiar to crowds, and not
possessed by isolated individuals. T he firs tjs that
the individual forming part of a crowd acquires,
^ solely from numerical considerations, a sentiment
of invincible power which allows him to yield to
instincts which, had he been alone, he would per-
force have kept under restraint He will be the
less disposed to check himself from the con-
sideration that, a crowd being anonymous, and
in consequence irresponsible, the sentiment of
responsibility which always controls individuals
disappears entirely.
*^ ^ The sQc;22}d-£ause, which is contagion, ^Iso inter-
^venes to determine the manifestation in crowds of
their speQial characteristics, and at the same time
the trend they are to take. C ontagio n is a phe-
nomenon of which it is easy to establish the pre-
sence, but that it is not easy to explain. It must
be classed among those phenomena of a hypnotic
order, which we shall shortly study. In a crowd
every sentiment and act is contagious, and con-
tagious to such a degree that an individual readily
sacrifices his personal interest to the collective
interest This is an aptitude very contrary to his
nature, and of which a man is scarcely capable,
except when he makes part of a crowd.
- ; A thir^,jca«s«, and by far the most important,
/ determines in the individuals of a crowd special
characteristics which are quite contrary at times
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS, ii
to those presented by the isolated individual. I
allude to that suggestibility of which, moreover,
the contagion mentioned above is neither more
nor less than an effect.
To understand this phenomenon it is necessary
to bear in mind certain recent physiological dis-
coveries. We know to-day that by various pro-
cesses an individual may be brought into such a
condition that, having entirely lost his conscious
personality, he obeys all the suggestions of the
operator who has deprived him of it, and commits
acts i n^ utter con tradiction with his character and
habits. The most careful observations seem to
prove that an individual immerged for some length
of time in a crowd in action soon finds himself —
either in consequence of the magnetic influence
given^out by the crowd, or from some other cause
of which we are ignorant — in a special state, which
much resembles the state of fascination in which
the hypnotised individual finds himself in the
hands of the hypnotiser. The activity of the
brain being paralysed in the case of the hypnotised
subject, the latter becomes the slave of all the un-
conscious activities of his spinal cord, which the
hypnotiser directs at will. The conscious per-
sonality has entirely vanished ; will* and discern-
ment are lost All feelings and thoughts are bent
in the direction determined by the hypnotiser.
Such also is approximately the state of the
/
" THE MIND OF CROWDS.
individual forming part of a psychological crowd
/ He is no longer conscious of his acts. In his case,
as in the case of the hypnotised subject, at the
same time that certain faculties are destroyed,
others may be brought to a high degree of exalta-
tion. Under the influence of a suggestion, he will
undertake the accomplishment of certain acts with
irresistible impetuosity. This impetuosity is the
more irresistible in the case of crowds than in that
of the hypnotised subject, from the fact that, the
suggestion being the same for all the individuals of
the crowd, it gains in strength by reciprocity. The
individualities in the crowd who might possess a
personality sufficiently strong to resist the sugges-
tion are too few in number to struggle against the
current At the utmost, they may be able to
attempt a diversion by means of different sugges-
tions. It is in this way, for instance, that a happy
expression, an image opportunely evoked, have
occasionally deterred crowds from the most blood-
thirsty acts. »
We see, then, that the disappearance of the con-
scious personality, the predominance of the uncon-
scious personality^the tumins by means of suggestion
and contagion of feelings arid ideas in an identical
-direction, the tendency to immediately transform
the suggested ideas into acts ; these, we see, are
the principal characteristics of the individual form-
ing part of a crowd. He is no longer himself, but
>
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS. 13
has become an automaton who has ceased to be
gfuided by his will.
Moreover, by the mere fact that he forms part of )
an organised crowd, a man descends several rungs t <
in the ladder of civilisation. Isolated, he may be
a cultivated individual ; in a crowd, he is a ba r-
barian — that is, a creature acting by instinct He
possesses the spontaneity, the violence, the ferocity^
and also the enthusiasm and heroism of primitive
beings, whom he further tends to resemble by the
facility with. which he allows himself to be im-
pressed by words and images — which would be
entirely without action on each of the isolated
individuals composing the crowd — and to be in«
duced to commit acts contrary to his most obvious
interests and his best-known habits. An individual
in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of
sand, which the w ind stirs up at will, uo ^v^^ ^-^ '^
It is for these reasons that juries are seen to
deliver verdicts of which each individual juror
would disapprove, that parliamentary assemblies
adopt laws and measures of which each of their
members would disapprove in his own person.
Taken separately, the men of the Convention were
enlightened citizens of peaceful habits. United in
a crowd, they did not hesitate to give their adhesion
to the most savage proposals, to guillotine indi-
viduals most clearly innocent, and, contrary to
their interests, to renounce their inviolability and
to decimate themselves.
14 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
It is not only by his acts that the individual in
a crowd differs essentially from himself. Even
before he has entirely lost his independence, his
ideas and feelings have undergone a transforma-
tion, and the transformation is so profound as to
change the miser into a spendthrift, the sceptic
into a believer, the honest man into a criminal, arid
the coward into a hero.. The renunciation of all
its privileges which the nobility voted in a moment
of enthusiasm during the celebrated night of August
4, 1789, would certainly never have been consented
to by any of its members taken singly.
The conclusion to be drawn from what precedes
is, that the crowd is always intellectually inferior
to the isolated individual, but that, from the point
of view of feelings and of the acts these feelings
provoke, the crowd may, according to circum-
kL_5tances,-J{e better or worse than the individual.
All depends on the nature of the suggestion to
which the crowd is exposed. This is the point
that has been completely misunderstood by
writers who have only studied crowds from the
criminal point of view. Doubtless a crowd is often
criminal, but also it is often heroic*^ It is crowds
rather than isolated individuals tha may be in-
duced to run the risk of death to secu e the triumph
of a creed or an idea, that may be ired with en-
thusiasm for glory and honour, that ire led on —
almost without bread and without a ms, as in the
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CROWDS, 15
age of the Crusades — to deliver the tomb of Christ
from the infidel, or, as in '93, to defend the father-
land. Such heroism is without doubt somewhat
unconscious, but it is of such heroism that history
is made. Were peoples only to be credited with
the great actions performed in cold blood, the
annals of the world would register but few of
them.
■
r
CHAPTER II.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS.
§ I. Impulsiveness^ mobility, and irritability of crowds. The
crowd is at the mercy of all exterior exciting causes,
and reflects their incessant variations — ^The impulses
which the crowd obeys are so imperious as to
annihilate the feeling of personal interest — Premedi-
tation is absent from crowds — Racial influence. § 2.
Crowds are credulous and readily influenced by sugges-
tion. The obedience of crowds to suggestions — ^The
images evoked in the mind of crowds are accepted
by them as realities — ^Why these images are identical
for all the individuals composing a crowd — ^The equality
of the educated and the ignorant man in a crowd —
Various examples of the illusions to which the in-
dividuals in a crowd are subject — The impossibility
of according belief to the testimony of crowds — ^The
^ unanimity of numerous witnesses is one of the 'worst •
f proofs that can be invoked to establish a fact — ^The
slight value of works of history. § 3. The exaggeration .
and ingenuousness of the sentiments of crowds. Crowds
do not admit doubt or uncertainty, and always go to
extremes — ^Their sentiments always excessive. J 4.
The intolerance, dictatorialness, and conservatism of
crowds. The reasons of these sentiments — ^The servility
of crowds in the face of a strong authority — The
16
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 17
momentary revolutionary instincts of crowds do not «
prevent them from being extremely conservative-^ [
' Crowds instinctively hostile to changes and progress, j
§ 5. The morality of crowds. The morality of crowds, f
according to the suggestions under which they act,
may be much lower or much higher than that of the in-
dividuals composing them — Explanation and examples
— Crowds rarely guided by those considerations of
interest which are most often the exclusive motives
of the isolated individual — ^The moralising role of
crowds. _
Having indicated in a general way the principal
characteristics of crowds, it remains to study these
characteristics in detail.
It will be reniajfked that among the special .
^^aracteiStics of crowds there are several — such I
as impulsiveness, irritability, incapacity to reason, |
the absence of judgment and of the critical spirit, 1
the exaggeration of the sentiments, and others )
besides — which are almost always observed in
beings belonging to i nferio r forms of evolution —
in JWMBW^^ savages, and children, for^n||tance. m^
- However, 1 merely indicate thi§!PSnaIo|y in "" j
passing ; its demonstration is outside the scope ^
of this work. It would^^ioreover, be useless for
persons acquainted with the psychology of primi-
tive beings, and would scarcely carry conviction
to those in ignorance of this matter.
I now proceed to the successive consideration
of the different characteristics that may be ob-
served in the majority of crowds.
3
i8 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
§ I. Impulsiveness, Mobility, and Irri-
tability OF Crowds.
When studying the fundamental characteristics
of a crowd we stated that it is guided almost
exclusively by unconscious motives. Its acts are
far more under the influence of the spinal cord
than of the brain. In this respect a crowd is
closely akin to quite primitive beings. The acts
performed may be perfect so far as their execu-
tion is concerned, but as they are not directed
by the brain, the individual conducts himself
according as the exciting causes to which he is
submitted may happen to decide. A crowd is
at the mercy of all external excitii^ cause
and reflects their incessant variations. It is the
slave of the impulses which it receives. The
isolated individual may be submitted to the
same exciting causes as the man in a crowd, but
as his brain shows him the. inadvisability of
yielding to them, he refrains from yielding. This
truth may be physiologically expressed by saying
that the isolated individual possesses the capacity
of dominating his reflex actions, while a crowd is
devoid of this capacity.
The varying impulses to which ' crowds obey
may be, according to their exciting causes, gener-
ous or cruel, heroic or cowardly, but they will
always be so imperious that the interest of the
individual, even the interest of self-preservation.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 19
will not dominate them. The exciting causes
that may act on crowds being so varied,
and crowds always obeying them, crowds are in
consequence extremely mobile. This explains
how it is that we see them pass in a moment
from the most bloodthirsty ferocity to the most
extreme generosity and heroism. A crowd may
easily enact the part of an executioner, but not
less easily that of a martyr. It is crowds that
have furnished the torrents of blood requisite for
the triumph of every belief It is not necessary
to go back to the heroic ages to see what crowds
are capable of in this latter direction. They are
never sparing of their life in an insurrection,
and not long since a general,' becoming suddenly
popular, might easily have found a hundred
thousand men ready to sacrifice their lives for
his cause had he demanded it
Any display of premeditation by crowds is in
consequence out of the question. They may be
animated in succession by the most contrary
sentiments, but they will always be under the
influence of the exciting causes of the moment.
They are like the leaves which a tempest whirls
up and scatters in every direction and then allows
to fall. When studying later on certain re-
volutionary crowds we shall give some examples
of the variability of their sentiments.
' General Boulanger.
20 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
This mobility of crowds renders them veiy
difficult to govern, especially when a measure of
public authority has fallen into their hands.
Did not the necessities of everyday life constitute
a sort of invisible regulator of existence, it would
scarcely be possible for democracies to last. Still,
though the wishes of crowds are frenzied they are
not durable. Crowds are as incapable of willing ^
as of thinking for any length of time.
A crowd is not merely impulsive and mobile.
Like a savage, it is not prepared to admit that
x/ anything can come between its desire and the
realisation of its desire. It is the less capable
of understandiilg such an intervention, in con-
sequence of the feeling of irresistible power given
it by its numerical strength. The notion of im-
possibility disappears for the individual in a crowd^
An isolated individual knows well enough that
alone he cannot set fire to a palace or loot a
shop, and should he be tempted to do so, he will
easily resist the temptation. Making part of a
crowd, he is conscious of the power given him
by number, and it is sufficient to suggest to him
ideas of murder or pillage for him to yield im-
mediately to temptation. An unexpected obstacle
will be destroyed with frenzied rage. Did the
human organism allow of the perpetuity of furious
passion, it might be said that the normal condition
of a crowd baulked in its wishes is just such a
state of furious passion.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 21
The fundamental characteristics of the race,
which constitute the unvarying source from which
all our sentiments spring, always exert an influence
on the irritability of crowds, their impulsiveness
and their mobility, as on all the popular sentiments
we shall have to study. All crowds are doubtless
always irritable and impulsive, but with great
variations of degree. For instance, the difference
between a Latin and an Anglo-Saxon crowd is
striking. The most recent facts in French history
throw a vivid light on this point. The mere pub-
lication, twenty-five years ago, of a telegram,
relating an insult supposed to have been offered
an ambassador, was sufficient to determine an
explosion of fury, whence follo\yed immediately ^^ ^
a terrible war. Some years later the telegjraphic ^ \
announcement of an insignificant reverse. at Lang- I
son provoked a fresh explosion which brought y
about the instantaneous overthrow of the govern^;>^
ment. At the same moment a much more serious
reverse undergone by the English expedition to
Khartoum produced only a slight emotion in ^
England, and no ministry was overturned. Crowds ^Jr^
are everywhere distinguishedJ 2Y feminine charac- | •
tfidstigs, but Latin crowds are the most feminir^
of all. Whoever trusts in them may rapidly attain
a lofty destiny, but- to do so is to be perpetually
skirting the brink of a Tarpeian rock, with the
certainty of one day being precipitated from it
V/NA^
J
22 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
§ 2. The Suggestibility and Credulity
OF Crowds.
When defining crowds, we said that one of their
general characteristics was an excessive suggesti-
bility, and we have shown to what an extent sugges-
tions are contagious in every human agglomeration ;
a fact which explains the rapid turning of the
sentiments of a crowd in a definite direction.
However indifferent it may be supposed, a crowd,
as a rule, is in a state of expectant attention, which
renders suggestion easy. The first suggestion formu-
lated which arises implants itself immediately by
a process of contagion in the brains of all assem-
bled, and the identical bent of the sentiments of
the crowd is immediately an accomplished fact.
As is the case with all persons under the influence
of suggestion, the idea which has entered the brain
tends to transform itself into an act. Whether the
act is that of setting fire to a palace, or involves
self-sacrifice, a crowd lends itself to it with equal
facility. All will depend on the nature of the
exciting cause, and no longer, as in the case of
the isolated individual, on the relations existing
between the act suggested and the sum total of
the reasons which may be urged against its
realisation.
In consequence, a crowd perpetually hovering
on the borderland of unconsciousness, readily
yielding to all suggestions, having all the violence
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 23
of feeling peculiar to beings who cannot appeal to
the influence of reason, deprived of all critical
faculty, cannot be otherwise than excessively
credulous. The improbable does not exist for a
» crowd, and it is necessary to bear this circumstance
well in mind to understand the facility with which
are created and propagated the most improbable
legends and stories.^
The creation of the legends which so easily
obtain circulation in crowds is not solely the
consequence of their extreme credulity. It is
also the result of the prodigious perversions that
events undergo in the imagination of a throng.
The simplest event that comes under the obser-
vation of a crowd is soon totally transformed.
A A crowd thinks in images, and the image itself
[immediately calls up a series of other images, .
having no logical connection with the first We
can easily conceive this state by thinking of the
fantastic succession of ideas to which we are
sometimes led by calling up in our minds any
fact Our reason shows us the incoherence there
is in these images, but a crowd is almost blind
* Persons who went through the siege of Paris saw
numerous examples of this credulity of crowds. A candle
alight in an upper story was immediately looked upon as
a signal given the besiegers, although it was evident, after
a. moment of reflection, that it was utterly impossible to
catch sight of the light of the candle at a distance of
several miles.
24 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
to this truth, and confuses with the real event
what the deforming action of its imagination has
superimposed thereon. A crowd scarcely distin-
guishes between the subjective and the objective.
It accepts as real the images evoked in its mind,
though they most often have only a very distant
relation with the observed fact.
The ways in which a crowd perverts any event
of which it is a witness ought, it would seem, to be
innumerable and unlike each other, since the in-
dividuals composing the gathering are of very
different temperaments. But this is not the case.
As the result of contagion the perversions are of
the same kind, and take the same shape in the
case of all the assembled individuals.
The first perversion of the truth effected by one
of the individuals of the gathering is the starting-
point of the contagious suggestion. Before St
Greorge appeared on the walls of Jerusalem to all
the Crusaders he was certainly perceived in the
first instance by one of those present By dint of
suggestion and contagion the miracle signalised
by a single person was immediately accepted by
all.
Such is always the mechanism of the collective
hallucinations so frequent in history — ^hallucinations
which seem to have all the recognised character-*
istics of authenticity, since they are phenomena
observed by thousands of persons.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 25
To combat what precedes, the mental quality of
the individuals copiposing a crowd must not be
brought into consideration. This quality is without
importance. From the moment that they form
part of a crowd the learned man and the ignoramus
are equally incapable of observation.
This thesis may seem paradoxical. To demon-
strate it beyond doubt it would be necessary ta
investigate a great number of historical facts, and
several volumes would be insufficient for the pur-
pose.
Still, as I do not wish to leave the reader
under the impression of unproved assertions, I
shall give him some examples taken at hazard
from the immense number of those that might be
quoted.
The following fact is one of the most typical,,
because chosen from among collective hallucina-
tions of which a crowd is the victim, in which are
to be found individuals of every kind, from the
most ignorant to the most highly educated. It is
related incidentally by Julian Felix, a naval lieu-
tenant, in his book on "Sea Currents," and has
been previously cited by the Revue Scientifique.
The frigate, the Belle Poule, was cruising in the
; open sea for the purpose of finding the cruiser Le
^-BerceaUy from which she had been separated by a
violent storm. It was broad daylight and in full
sunshine. Suddenly the watch signalled a dis-
26 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
abled vessel ; the crew looked in the direction
signalled, and every one, officers and sailors,
clearly perceived a raft covered with men towed
by boats which were displaying signals of distress.
Yet this was nothing more than a collective hallu-
cination. Admiral Desfosses lowered a boat to
go to the rescue of the wrecked sailors. On
nearing the object sighted, the sailors and officers
on board the boat saw " masses of men in motion,
stretching out their hands, and heard the dull and
confused noise of a great number of voices." When
the object was reached those in the boat found
themselves simply and solely in the presence of a
few branches of trees covered with leaves that
had been swept out from the neighbouring coast.
Before evidence so palpable the hallucination
vanished.
The mechanism of a collective hallucination of
the kind we have explained is clearly seen at work
in this example. On the one hand we have a
^^ crowd in a state of expectant attention, on the
other a suggestion made by the watch signalling a
disabled vessel at sea, a suggestion which, by a
process of contagion, was accepted by all those
present, both officers and sailors.
It is not necessary that a crowd should be
numerous for the faculty of seeing what is taking
place before it3 eyes to be destroyed and for the
real facts to be replaced by hallucinations unre-
, ^
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 27
lated to them. As soon as a few individuals are
gathered together they constitute a crowd, and,
though they should be distinguished men of
learning, they assume all the characteristics of
crowds with regard to matters outside their
speciality. The faculty of observation and thej
critical spirit possessed by each of them indi-'
vidually at once disappears. An ingenious psy-
chologist, Mr. Davey, supplies us with a very
curious example in point, recently cited in the
Annates des Sciences Psychiques^ and deserving of
relation here. Mr. Davey, having convoked a
gathering of distinguished observers, among them
one of the most prominent of English scientific
men, Mr. Wallace, executed in their presence, and
after having allowed them to examine the objects
and to place seals where they wished, all the
regulation spiritualistic phenomena, the materiali-
sation of spirits, writing on slates, &c. Having
subsequently obtained from these distinguished
observers written reports admitting that the
phenomena observed could only have been ob-
tained by supernatural means, he revealed to
them that they were the result of very simple
tricks. " The most astonishing feature of Monsieur
Davey's investigation," writes the author of this
account, "is not the marvellousness of the tricks
themselves, but the extreme weakness of the
reports made with respect to them by the non-
1^
28 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
initiated witnesses. It is clear, then," he says,
"that witnesses even in number may give cir-
cumstantial relations which are completely jpsro-
neous, but whose result is ^Aat, if their descriptions
are accepted as exacts the phenomena they describe
are inexplicable by trickery. The methods invented
by Mr. Davey were so simple that one is aston-
ished that he should have had the boldness to
employ them ; but he had such a power over the
mind of the crowd that he could persuade it that
it saw what it did not see." Here, as always, we
have the power of the hypnotiser over the hypno-
tised. Moreover, when this power is seen in action
on minds of a superior order and previously invited
to be suspicious, it is understandable how easy it is
to deceive ordinary crowds. -i^
Analogous examples are innumerable. As I
write these lines the papers are full of the story
of two little girls found drowned in the Seine.
These children, to begin with, were recognised in
the most unmistakable manner by half a dozen
witnesses. All the affirmations were in such
entire concordance that no doubt remained in
the mind of the juge d' instruction. He had the
certificate of death drawn up, but just as the
burial of the children was to have been proceeded
with, a mere chance brought about the discovery
that the supposed victims were alive, and had,
moreover, but a remote resemblance to the drowned
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 29
girls. As in several of the examples previously
cited, the affirmation of the first witness, himself a
victim of illusion, had sufficed to influence the other
witnesses. \>(\^^^ fK^sV^ Csvw^uft^/
In parallel cases the starting-point of the
suggestion is always the illusion produced in an
individual by more or less vague reminiscences,
contagion following as the result of the affirmation
of this initial illusion. If the first observer be very
^^ impressionable, it will often be sufficient that the
corpse he believes he recognises should present —
apart from all real resemblance — some peculiarity,
a scar, or some detail of toilet which may evoke
the idea of another person. The idea evoked may
then become the nucleus of a sort of crystallisation
which invades the understanding and paralyses all
critical faculty. What the observer then sees is no
longer the object itself, but the image evoked in
his mind. In this way are to be explained
erroneous recognitions of the dead bodies of
children by their own mother, as occurred in the
following case, already old, but which has been
recently recalled by the newspapers. In it are to
be traced precisely the two kinds of suggestion of
which I have just pointed out the mechanism.
"The child was recognised by another child,
who was mistaken. The series of unwarranted
recognitions then began.
30 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
" An extraordinary thing occurred. The day
after a schoolboy had recognised the corpse a
woman exclaimed, * Good Heavens, it is my
child ! '
" She was taken up to the corpse ; she examined
the clothing, and noted a scar on the forehead. * It
is certainly,' she said, *my son who disappeared
last July. He has been stolen from me and
murdered.'
" The woman was concierge in the Rue du Four ;
her name was Chavandret Her brother-in-law
was summoned, and when questioned he said,
* That is the little Filibert' Several persons living
in the street recognised the child found at La
Villette as Filibert Chavandret, among them being
the boy's schoolmaster, who based his opinion on a
medal worn by the lad.
" Nevertheless, the neighbours, the brother-in-
law, the schoolmaster, and the mother were
mistaken. Six weeks later the identity of the
child was established. The boy, belonging to
Bordeaux, had been murdered there and brought
by a carrying company to Paris." '
It will be remarked that these recognitions are
most often made by women and children — that is
' to say, by precisely the most impressionable per-
sons. They show us at the same time what is the
* L Eclair, April 21, 1895.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 31
worth in law courts of such witnesses. As far as
childreh, more especially, are concerned, their
statements ought never to be invoked. Magis-
trates kre in the habit of repeating that children
do not lie. Did they possess a psychological
culture a little less rudimentary than is the case
they would know that, on the contrary, children
invariably lie ; the lie is doubtless innocent, but it
is none the less a lie. It would be better to decide
the fate of an accused person by the toss of a coin
t than, as has been so often done, by the evidence of
a child.
To return to the faculty of observation possessed
• by crowds, our conclusion is that their collective
observations are as erroneous as possible, and that
most often they merely represent the illusion of an
individual who, by a process of contagion, has
suggestioned his fellows. Facts proving that the
most utter mistrust of the evidence of crowds is
advisable might be multiplied to any extent.
Thousands of men were present twenty-five years
ago at the celebrated cavalry charge during the
battle of Sedan, and yet it is impossible, in the
face of the most contradictory ocular testimony, to
decide by whom it was commanded. The English
general. Lord Wolseley, has proved in a recent
book that up to now the gravest errors of fact
have been committed with regard to the most
important incidents of the battle of Waterloo —
32
THE MIND OF CROWDS.
^^. ;
/
V-
facts that hundreds of witnesses had nevertheless
attested.'
Such facts show us what is the value of the testi-
mony of crowds. Treatises on logic include the
unanimity of numerous witnesses in the category
of the strongest proofs that can be invoked in
support of the exactness of a fact Yet what we
know of the psychology of crowds shows that
treatises on logic need on this point to be rewritten.
The events with regard to which there exists the
most doubt are certainly those which have been
observed by the greatest number of persons. To
say that a fact has been simultaneously verified by
thousands of witnesses is to say, as a rule, that the
real fact is very different from the accepted account
of it.
' Do we know in the case of one single battie exactly
how it took place ? I am very doubtful on the point. We
know who were the conquerors and the conquered, but this
is probably all. What M. D'Harcourt has said with respect
to the battle of Solferino, which he witnessed and in which
he was personally engaged, may be applied to aU battles —
"The generals (informed, of course, by the evidence of
hundreds of witnesses) forward their official reports; the
orderly officers modify these documents and draw up a
definite narrative ; the chief of the staff raises objections
and re-writes the whole on a fresh basis. It is carried to
the Marshal, who exclaims, ' You are entirely in error,* and
he substitutes a fresh edition. Scarcely anything remains
of the original report." M. D'Harcourt relates this fact as
proof of the impossibility of establishing the truth in
connection with the most striking, the best observed
events.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 33
It clearly results from what precedes that works
of history must be considered as works of pure )
• • * * *
* imagination. They are fanciful accounts of ill-
observed facts, accompanied by explanations the
result of reflection. To write such books is the
most absolute waste of time. Had not the past
left us its literary, artistic, and monumental works,
we should know absolutely nothing in reality with
regard to bygone times. Are we in possession of
; a single word of truth concerning the lives of the
great men who have played preponderating parts
in the history of humanity — men such as Her-
cules, Buddha, or Mahomet? In all probability
we are not. In point of fact, moreover, their real
lives are of slight importance to us. Our interest
is to know what our great men were as they are
presented by popular legend. It is legendary
heroes, and not for a moment real heroes, who
have impressed the minds of crowds.
Unfortunately, legends — even although they
have been definitely put on record by books —
have in themselves no stability. The imagination
of the crowd continually transforms them as the
result of the lapse of time and especially in con-
sequence of racial causes. There is a great gulf
fixed between the sanguinary Jehovah of the Old
Testament and the God of Love of Sainte Th^r^se,
and the Buddha worshipped in China has no traits
in common with that venerated in India.
4
34 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
It is not even necessary that heroes should be
separated from us by centuries for their legend to
be transformed by the imagination of the crowd.
The transformation occasionally takes place
within a few years. In our own day we have
seen the legend of one of the greatest heroes of
history modified several times in less than fifty
years. Under the Bourbons Napoleon became a
sort of idyllic and liberal philanthropist, a friend
of the humble who, according to the poets, was
destined to be long remembered in the cotts^e.
Thirty years afterwards this easy-going hero had
become a sanguinary despot, who, after having
usurped power and destroyed liberty, caused the
slaughter of three million men solely to satisfy
his ambition. At present we are witnessing a
fresh transformation of the legend. When it has
undergone the influence of some dozens of centuries
the learned men of the future, face to face with
these contradictory accounts, will perhaps doubt
the very existence of the hero, as some of them now
doubt that of Buddha, and will see in him nothing
more than a solar myth or a development of the
legend of Hercules. They will doubtless console
themselves easily for this uncertainty, for, better
initiated than we are to-day in the characteristics
and psychology of crowds, they will know that
history is scarcely capable of preserving the
memory of anything except myths.
/.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 35
§ 3. The Exaggeration and Ingenuousness
OF THE Sentiments of Crowds.
Whether the feelings exhibited by a crowd be >
.good or bad, they present the double character
of being very simple and very exaggerated. On
this point, as on so many others, an individual in
a crowd resembles primitive beings. Inaccessible
•. to fine distinctions, he sees things as a whole, and
is blind to their intermediate phases. The exag- \
geration of the sentiments of a crowd is heightened 1 ^
by the fact that any feeling when once it is ex-
hibited communicating itself very quickly by a
process of suggestion and contagion, the evident
approbation of which it is the object considerably
increases its force. <r^^
The simplicity and exaggeration of the senti- n?-^
ments of crowds have » /or result that a throng (\. v^A
\ knows neither doubt nor uncertainty. Like^ttj^men \
it goes at once to extremes. A suspicion transform^ j. . -^ *^
itself as soon as announced into incontrovertible I ' '
evidence. A commencement of antipathy or disap- \
probation, which in the case of an isolated indi-
vidual would not gain strength, becomes at once
furious hatred in the case of an individual in a
crowd.
The violence of the feelings of crowds is also \
increased, especially in heterogeneous crowds, by y
the absence of all sense of responsibility. The
w
36 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
certainty of impunity, a certainty the stronger as
the crowd is more numerous, and the notion of a
considerable momentary force due to number, make
possible in the case of crowds sentiments and acts
impossible for the isolated individual. In crowds
•. the foolish, ignorant, and envious persons are freed
from the sense of their insignificance and power-
lessness, and are possessed instead by the notion of
brutal and temporary but immense strength.
Unfortunately, this tendency of crowds towards
exaggeration is often brought to bear upon bad
sentiments. These sentiments are atavistic re-
"^^CAyX-y^^ siduum of the instincts of the primitive man, which
^ (J tne fear of punishment obliges the isolated and
responsible individual to curb. Thus it is that
crowds are so easily led into the worst excesses.
Still this does not mean that crowds, skilfully
influenced, are not capable of heroism and devotion
and of evincing the loftiest virtues ; they are even
more capable of showing these qualities than the
isolated individual. We shall soon have occasion
to revert to this point when we come to study the
morality of crowds.
Given to exaggeration in its feelings, a crowd is
only impressed by excessive sentiments. An orator
wishing to move a crowd must make an abusive
use of violent affirmations. To exaggerate, to
affirm, to resort to repetitions, and never to attempt
to prove anything by reasoning are methods of
\/
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 37
argument well known to speakers at public meet-
ings.
Moreover, a crowd exacts a like exaggeration
in the sentiments of its heroes— Their apparent
qualities and virtues must always be amplified.
It has been justly remarked that on the stage a
' crowd demands from the hero of the piece a degree
of courage, morality, and virtue that is never to be
found in real life.
Quite rightly importance has been laid on the
special standpoint from which matters are viewed
in the theatre. Such a standpoint exists no doubt,
but its rules for the most part have nothing to do
with common sense and logic. The art of appeal-
ing to crowds IS no doubt of an inferior order, but
it demands quite special aptitudes. It is often
impossible on reading plays to explain their
success. Managers of theatres when accepting
pieces are themselves, as a rule, very uncertain
of their success, because to judge the matter it
would be necessary that they should be able to
transform themselves into a crowd.'
' It is understandable for this reason why it sometimes
happens that pieces refused by all theatrical managers
obtain a prodigious success when by a stroke of chance
they are put on the stage. The recent success of Francois
Copp6e*s play " Pour la Couronne " is well known, and yet, in
spite of the name of its author, it was refused during ten
years by the managers of the principal Parisian theatres.
"Ch^ley's Aunt," refused at every theatre, and finally
38 THi MIND OF CROWDS.
Here, once more, were we able te embark on
more extensive explanations, we should show the
\ preponderating iniluei^e of racial considerations.
A play which provokes the tothusiasm of the
crowd in one country has sometimes no success
in another^or has only a partial and conventional
success, because it does not put in operation in-
fluences capable of working on anj altered public.
I need not add that the tendency to exaggeration
in crowds is only present in the case of sentiments
► and not at all in the matter of intelligence. I have
already shown that, by the mere fact that an in-
dividual forms part of a crowd, »^his intellectual A d
standard is immediately and considerably lowered. M
A learned magistrate, M. Tarde, has also verified
this fact in his researches on the crimes of
crowds. It is only, then, with respect to sentiment
that crowds can rise to a very high or, on the
contrary, descend to a very low level.
staged at the expense of a stockbroker, has had two
hundred representations in France, and more than a
thousand in London. Without the explanation given
above of the impossibility for theatrical managers to
mentally substitute themselves for a crowd, such mistakes
in judgment on the part of competent individuals, who are
most interested not to commit such grave blunders, would
be inexplicable. This is a subject that I cannot deal with
here, but it might worthily tempt the pen of a writer
acquainted with theatrical matters, and at the same time
a subtle psychologist — of such a writer, for instance, as
M. Francisque Sarcey. ^
THE SEliTIMENTS AND^. MORALITY OF CROWDS: 39
r ^
§ 4. The Intolerance, Dictatorialne^s
AND Conservatism of Crowds.
Crowds are only cognisant of simple and
*. extreme sentiments ; the opinions, ideas, and
beliefs suggested to them are accepted or rejected
as a whole, and considered as absolute truths or
as not less absolute errors. This is always the
case with beliefs induced by a process of sugges-
tion instead of engendered by reasoning. Every
one is aware of the intolerance that accompanies
religious beliefs, and of the despotic empire they
exercise on men's minds.
I Being in doubt as to what constitutes truth orf
error, and having, on the other hand, a clear
notion of its strength, a crowd is as disposed to
give authoritative effect to its inspirations as it is
\ intolerant. An individual may accept contradic-
tion and discussion ; a crowd will never do so.
At public meetings the slightest contradiction on
the part of an orator is immediately received with
howls of fury and violent invective, soon followed
by blows, and expulsion should the orator stick to
his point. Without the restraining presence of
the representatives of authority the contradictor,
Indeed, would often be done to death.
Dictatorialness and intolerance are common to
• all categories of crowds, but they are met with in
a varying degree of intensity. Here, once more,
reappears that fundamental notion of race which
\y-
40 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
dominates all the feelings and all the thoughts of
men. It is more especially in Latin crowds that
authoritativeness and intolerance are found de-
veloped in the highest measure. In fact, their
development is such in crowds of Latin origin that
they have entirely destroyed that sentiment of the
independence of the individual so powerful in the
Anglo-Saxon. Latin crowds are only concerned
with the collective independence of the sect to
which they belong, and the characteristic feature
of their conception of independence is the need
they experience of bringing those who are in
disagreement with themselves into immediate and
violent subjection to their beliefs. Among the
Latin races the Jacobins of every epoch, from
those of the Inquisition downwards, have never
been able to attain to a different conception of
liberty.
Authoritativeness and intolerance are sentiments
of which crowds have a very clear notion, whiclu
they easily conceive and which they entertain as
readily as they put them in practice when once they
are imposed upon them. Crowds exhibit a docile
respect for force, and are but slightly impressed
by kindness, which for them is scarcely other than
a form of weakness. Their sympathies have never
been bestowed on easy-going masters, but on tyrants
who vigorously oppressed them. It is to these
latter that they always erect the loftiest statues.
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 41
It is true that they willingly trample on the despot
whom they have stripped of his power, but it is
because, having lost his strength, he has resumed
his place among the feeble, who are to be despised
because they are not to be feared. The type of
hero dear to crowds will always have the semblance
of a Caesar. His insignia attracts them, his
authority overawes them, and his sword instils
them with fear.
A crowd is always ready to revolt against a
feeble, and to bow down servilely before a strong
authority. Should the strength of an authority
be intermittent, the crowd, always obedient to its
extreme sentiments, passes alternately from
anarchy to servitude, and from servitude to
anarchy.
However, to believe in the predominance among
crowds of revolutionary instincts would be to
entirely misconstrue their psychology. It is
merely their tendency to violence that deceives
us on this point. Their rebellious and destructive
outbursts are always very transitory. Crowds are
too much governed by unconscious considerations,
and too much subject in consequence to secular
hereditary influences not to be extremely con-
servative. Abandoned to themselves, they soon
weary of disorder, and instinctively turn to servi-
tude. It was the proudest antf most untractable
of the Jacobins who acclaimed Bonaparte with
1
42 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
greatest energy when he suppressed all liberty
and made his hand of iron severely felt
It is difficult to understand history, and popu-
lar revolutions in particular, if one does not take
\ sufficiently into account the profoundly conser-
vative instincts of crowds. They may be de-
sirous, it is true, of changing the names of their
institutions, and to obtain these changes they
accomplish at times even violent revolutions, but
the essence of these institutions is too much the
expression of the hereditary needs of the race for
them not invariably to abide by it. Their in-
j cessant mobility only exerts its influence on quite
- superficial matters. In fact they possess con-
servative instincts as indestructible as those of
all primitive beings. Their fetish-like respect for
all traditions is absolute ; their unconscious horror
of all novelty capable of changing the essential
conditions of their existence is very deeply rooted.
Had democracies possessed the power they wield
to-day at the time of the invention of mechanical
looms or of the introduction of steam-power and
of railways, the realisation of these inventions
would have been impossible, or would have been
achieved at the cost of revolutions and repeated
massacres. It is fortunate for the progress of
'-"Civilisation that the power of crowds only began
to exist when the great discoveries of science and
industry had already been effected.
l^
the sentiments and morality of crowds. 43
§ 5. The Morality of Crowds.
Taking the word " morality " to mean constant
respect for certain social conventJbns,- and the
permanent repression of selfish impulses, it is
quite evident that crowds are too impulsive and \ 'ly
too mobile to be moral. If, however, we include
in the term morality the transitory display of
certain qualities such as abnegation, self-sacrifice,
disinterestedness, devotion, and the need of equity,
we may say, on the contrary, that crowds may
exhibit at times a very lofty morality.
The few psychologists who have studied crowds
have only considered them from the point of view
of their criminal acts, an4 noticing how frequent
these acts are, they have come to the conclusion
, that the moral standard of crowds is very low.
Doubtless this is often the case ; but why ?
Simply because our savage, destructive instinct*
are the inheritance left dormant in all of us from
the primitive ages. In the life of the isolated
individual it would be dangerous for him to
gratify these instincts, while his absorption in an
irresponsible crowd, in which in consequence he
IS assured of impunity, gives him entire liberty
to follow them. Being unable, in the ordinary
course of events, to exercise these destructive
instincts on our fellow-men, we confine ourselves
to exercising them on animals. The passion, so
widespread, for the chase and the acts of ferocity
\i
44 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
of crowds proceed from one and the same source.
A crowd which slowly slaughters a defenceless
' victim displays a very cowardly ferocity ; but for
the philosopher this ferocity is very closely related
to that of the huntsmen who gather in dozens for
the pleasure of taking part in the pursuit and
killing of a luckless stag by their hounds.
A crowd may be guilty of murder, incendiarism,
and every kind of crime, but it is also capable
of very lofty acts of devotion, sacrifice, and dis-
interestedness, of acts much loftier indeed than
those of which the isolated individual is capable.
Appeals to sentiments of glory, honour, and
patriotism are particularly likely to influence the
individual forming part of a crowd, and often tp
the extent of obtaining from him the sacrifice of
his life. History is rich in examples analogous to
those furnished by the Crusaders and the volun-
teers of 1793. Collectivities alone are capable of
great disinterestedness and great devotion. How
numerous are the crowds that have heroically
faced death for beliefs, ideas, and phrases that
they scarcely understood ! The crowds that go
on strike do so far more in obedience to an order
than to obtain an increase of the slender salary
with which they make shift Personal interest is/
> / / very rarely a powerful motive force with crowds,\
W / while it is almost the exclusive motive of the'
<:onduct of the isolated individual. It is assuredly
THE SENTIMENTS AND MORALITY OF CROWDS. 45
not self-interest that has guided crowds in so
many wars, incomprehensible as a rule to their
intelligence — wars in which they have allowed
themselves to be massacred as easily as the larks
hypnotised by the mirror of the hunter.
Even in the case of absolute scoundrels it often
»
happens that the mere fact of their being in a
crowd endows them for the moment with very
strict principles of morality. Taine calls attention
to the fact that the perpetrators of the September
massacres deposited on the table of the committees
the pocket-books and jewels they had found on
their victims, and with which they could easily
have been able to make away. The howling,
swarming, ragged crowd which invaded the
Tuileries during the revolution of 1848 did not
lay hands on any of the objects that excited its
astonishment, and one of which would have meant
bread for many days.
This moralisation of the individual by the
crowd is not certainly a constant rule, but it is
a rule frequently observed. It is even observed in
circumstances much less grave than those I have
just cited. I have remarked that in the theatre
a crowd exacts from the hero of the piece
exaggerated virtues, and it is a commonplace
observation that an assembly, even though com-
posed of inferior elements, shows itself as a rule
very prudish. The debauchee, the souteneur, the
■M
46 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
rough often break out into murmurs at a slightly
risky scene or expression, though they be very
harmless in comparison with their customary
conversation.
If, then, crowds often abandon themselves to
• low instincts, they also set the example at times
. of acts of lofly morality. If disinterestedness,
resignation, and absolute devotion to a real or
chimerical ideal are moral virtues, it may be said
that crowds often possess these virtues to a degree
rarely attained by the wisVst philosophers. Doubt-
less they practice them unconsciously, but that is
of small import. We should not complain too
\ much that crowds are more especially guided by
unconscious considerations and are not given to
reasoning. Had they, in certain cases, reasoned
and consulted their immediate interests, it is
possible that no civilisation would have grown up
on our planet and humanity would have had no
history.
CHAPTER III.
THE IDEAS, REASON IXG POWER, A\D IMAGINATION
OF CROWDS,
§ I. The ideas of crowds. Fun^amgntal and accessory ideas
— How contradictory idets may exist simultaneously —
The transformation that must be undergone by lofty
ideas before they are accessible to crowds — The social
influence of ideas is independent of the degree of truth ^^ *' ^^ ^^:^
they may contain. § 2. The reasoning power of crowds, I'-v^^*-^
Crowds are not to be influenced by reasoning — ^The vv ';. V
reasoning of crowds is always of a very inferior order
— ^There is only the appearance of analogy or succes-
sion in the ideas they associate. § 3. The imagination
of crowds. Strength of the imagination of crowds —
Crowds think in images, and these images succeed
each other without any connecting link — Crowds are
especially impressed by the marvellous — Legends and
the marvellous are the real pillars of civilisation — ^The
popular imagination has always been the basis of the
power of statesmen — The manner in which facts
capable of striking the imagination of crowds present
themselves for observation.
§ I. The Ideas of Crowds.
When stiiHyfng in a preceding work the part
played by ideas in the evolution of nations, we
showed that every civilisation is the outcome of a
small number of fundamental ideas that are very
47
48 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
rarely renewed. We showed how these ideas are
implanted in the minds of crowds, with what
difficulty the process is effected, and the power
possessed by the ideas in question when once it
has been accomplished. Finally we saw that
great historical perturbations are the result, as a
rule, of changes in these fundamental ideas.
Having treated this subject at sufficient length,
I shall not return to it now, but shall confine my-
self to saying a few words on the subject of such
ideas as are accessible to crowds, and of the forms
under which they conceive them.
They may be divided into two classes. In one we
shall place accidental and passing ideas^reated by
the influences of the moment : infatuation for an
individual or a doctrine, for instance. In the other
will be classed the fundamental ideas, to which
the environment, the laws of heredity and public
opinion give a very great stability ; such ideas are
the religious beliefs of the past and the social and
democratic ideas of to-day.
/ These fundamental ideas resemble the volume
) of the water of a stream slowly pursuing
J its course ; the transitory ideas are like the
/ small waves, for ever changing, which agitate its
s surface, and are more visible than the progress of
"\ L the stream itself although without real importance.
At the present day the great fundamental ideas
which were the mainstay of our fathers are
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS. 49
tottering more and more. They have lost all
solidity, and at the same time the institutions
resting upon them are severely shaken. Every
day there are formed a great many of those
transitory minor ideas of which I have just been
speaking ; but very few of them to all appearance
seem endowed with vitality and destined to
acquire a preponderating influence.
Whatever be the ideas suggested to crowds]
they can only exercise effective influence on ^
condition that they assume a very absolute, un-
compromising, and simple shape. They present^
themselves then in the guise of images, and arej w
only accessible to the masses under this form.;
These imagelike ideas are not connected by any
logical bond of analogy or succession, and may
take each other's place like the slides of a magic-
lantern which the operator withdraws from the
groove in which they were placed one above the
other. This explains how it is that the most con-
tradictory ideas may be seen to be simultaneously
current in crowds. According to the chances of the
moment, a crowd will come under the influence of
one of the various ideas stored up in its under-
standing, and is capable, in consequence, of com-
mitting the most dissimilar acts. Its complete j
lack of the critical spirit does not allow of its per-
ceiving these contradictions.
This phenomenon is not peculiar to crowds. It
5
so THE MIND OF CROWDS.
is to be observed in many isolated individuals, not
only among primitive beings, but in the case of all
those — the fervent sectaries of a religious faith, for
instance — who by one side or another of their
intelligence are akin to primitive beings. I have
observed its presence to a curious extent in the
case of educated Hindoos brought up at our
European universities and having taken their
degree. A number of Western ideas had been
superposed on their unchangeable and funda-
mental hereditary or social ideas. According
to the chances of the moment, the one or the
other set of ideas showed themselves each with
their special accompaniment of acts or utter-
ances, the same individual presenting in this way
the most flagrant contradictions. These con-
tradictions are more apparent than real, for it
is only hereditary ideas that have sufficient in-
fluence over the isolated individual to become
motives of conduct. It is only when, as the result
of the intermingling of different races, a man is
placed between different hereditary tendencies
that his acts from one moment to another may be
really entirely contradictory. It would be use-
less to insist here on these phenomena, although
their psychological importance is capital. I am
of opinion that at least ten years of travel and
observation would be necessary to arrive at a com-
prehension of them.
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS. 51
Ideas being only accessible to crowds after
having assumed a very simple shape must often
undergo the most thoroughgoing transformations
to become popular. It is especially when we
are dealing with somewhat lofty philosophic or
scientific ideas that we see how far-reaching are
the modifications they require in order to lower
them to the level of the intelligence of crowds. /'
These modifications are dependent on the nature
of the crowds, or of the race to which the
crowds belong, but their tendency is always be-
littling and in the direction of simplification.
This explains the fact that, from the social point
of view, there is in reality scarcely any such thing
as a hierarchy of ideas — that is to say, as ideas of
greater or less elevation. However great or true
an idea may have been to begin with, it is deprived
of almost all that which constituted its elevation
and its greatness by the mere fact that it has,
come within the intellectual range of crowds and
exerts an influence upon them.
Moreover, from the social point of view the
hierarchical value of an idea, its intrinsic worth, is
without importance. The necessary point to con-
sider is the effects it produces. The Christian
ideas o^he Middle Ages, the democratic ideas of
the lasr century, or the social ideas of to-day are
assuredly not very elevated. Philosophically con-
sidered, they can only be regarded as somewhat
^/^
^
J
52 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
sorry errors, and yet their power has been and will
be immense, and they will count for a long time to
come among the most essential factors that deter-
mine the conduct of States.
Even when an idea has undergone the trans-
formations which render it accessible to crowds, it
only exerts influence w hen, by various processes
which we shall examine elsewhere, it has entered
the domain of the unconscious, when indeed it
has become a sentim ent, for which much time is
required.
For it must not be supposed that merely
because the justness of an idea has been proved
it can be productive of effective action even on
cultivated minds. This fact may be quickly ap-
preciated by noting how slight is the influence of
the clearest demonstration on the majority of men.
Evidence, if it be very plain, may be accepted by
an educated person, but the convert will be quickly
brought back by his unconscious self to his original
conceptions. See him again after the lapse of a
few days and he will put forward afresh his old
arguments in exactly the same terms. He is in
reality under the influence of anterior ideas, that
have be come sen timents, and >itjs such ideas alone
that influence the more recondite motivA of our
act s and ut tei^ance^r— ^^Itcannot be otftefwise" in
the case 0/ crowds.
When by various processes an idea has ended
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS, 53
by penetrating into the minds of crowds, it pos-
sesses an irresistible power, and brings about a
series of eflFects, opposition to which is bootless.
The philosophical ideas which resulted in the
French Revolution took nearly a century to im-
plant themselves in the mind of the crowd. Their
irresistible force, when once they had taken root, is
known. The striving of an entire nation towards
the conquest of social equality, and the realisation
of abstract rights and ideal liberties, caused the
tottering of all thrones and profoundly disturbed
the Western world. During twenty years the
nations were engaged in internecine conflict, and
Europe witnessed hecatombs that would have
terrified Ghengis Khan and Tamerlane. The
world had never seen on such a scale what may
result from the promulgation of an idea.
A long time is necessary for ideas to establish
themselves in the minds of crowds, but just as
long a time is needed for them to be eradicated.
For this reason crowds, as far as ideas are con-
cerned, are always several generations behind
learned men and philosophers. All statesmen are
well aware to-day of the admixture of error con-
tained in the fundamental ideas I referred to a
short while back, but as the influence of these
ideas is still very powerful they are obliged to
govern in accordance with principles in the truth
of which they have ceased to believe.
54 the mind of crowds.
§ 2. The Reasoning Power of Crowds.
It cannot absolutely be said that crowds do not
reason and are not to be influenced by reasoning.
However, the arguments they employ and those
which are capable of influencing theni are, from a
logical point of view, of such an inferior kind that
it is only by way of analogy that they can be
described as reasoning.
The inferior reasoning of crowds is based, just as
is reasoning of a high order, on the association of
ideas, but between the ideas associated by crowds
there are only apparent bonds of analogy or suc-
cession. The mode of reasoning of crowds re-
sembles that of the Esquimaux who, knowing
from experience that ice, a transparent body, melts
in the mouth, concludes that glass, also a trans-
parent body, should also melt in the mouth; or
that of the savage who imagines that by eating
the heart of a courageous foe he acquires his
bravery ; or of the workman who, having been
exploited by one employer of labour, immediately
concludes that all employers exploit their men.
The characteristics of the reasoning of crowds
\ are the association of dissimilar things, po^sessi^g a
J merely-apparenfconnection between each other,
and the immediate generalisation of particular
cases. It is arguments of this kind that are
always presented to crowds by those who know
how to manage them. They are the only argu-
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS. 55
ments by which crowds are to be influenced. A
chain of logical argumentation is totally incom-
prehensible to crowds, and for this reason it is | U
permissible to say that they do not reason or that
they reason falsely and are not to be influenced by
reasoning. Astonishment is felt at times on
reading certain speeches at their weakness, and
yet they had an enormous influence on the crowds
which listened to them, but it is forgotten that
they were intended to persuade collectivities and
not to be read by philosophers. An orator in
intimate communication with a crowd can evoke
images by which it will be seduced. If he is suc-
cessful his object has been attained, and twenty
volumes of harangues — always the outcome of
reflection — ^are not worth the few phrases which
appealed to the brains it was required to convince.
It would be superfluous to add that the power-
lessness of crowds to reason aright prevents them \
displaying any trace of the critical spirit, prevents
them, that is, from being capable of discerning
truth from error, or of forming a precise judgment
on any matter. Judgments accepted by crowds
are merely judgments forced upon them and
never judgments adopted after discussion. In
regard to this matter the individuals who do not
rise above the level of a crowd are numerous. The
ease with which certain opinions obtain general
acceptance results more especially from the impos-
ts
56 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
sibility experienced by the majority of men of
forming an opinion peculiar to themselves and
based on reasoning of their own.
§ 3. The Imagination of Crowds.
Just as is the case with respect to persons in
whorti the reasoning power is absent, the figurative
imagination of crowds is very powerful, very active
and very susceptible of being keenly impressed.
The images evoked in their mind by a personage,
an event, an accident, are almost as lifelike as the
reality. Crowds are to some extent in the position
of the sleeper whose reason, suspended for the
time being, allows the arousing in his mind of
images of extreme intensity which- would quickly
be dissipated could they be submitted to the
action of reflection. Crowds, being incapable both
of reflection and of .reasoning, are devoid of the
notion of improbability ; and it is to be noted
that in a general way it is the most improbable
things that are the most striking.
This is why it happens that it is always the mar-
vellous and legendary side of events that more
specially strike crowds. When a civilisation is
analysed it is seen that, in reality, it is the mar-
vellous and the legendary that are its true supports.
Appearances have always played a much more
important part than reality in history, where the
unreal is always of greater moment than the real.
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS. 57
Crowds being only capable of thinking in
images are only to be impressed by images. It
is only images that terrify or attract them and
become motives of action.
For this reason theatrical representations, in
which the image is shown in its most clearly
visible shape, always have an enormous influence
on crowds. Bread and spectacular shows consti-
tuted for the pjebeian s of ancient Rome the ideal
of happiness, and they asked for nothing more.
Throughout the successive ages this ideal has
scarcely varied. Nothing has a greater effect on
the imagination of crowds of every category than
theatrical representations. The entire audience-
experiences at the same time the same emotions,
and if these emotions are not at once transformed
into acts, it is because the most unconscious spec-
tator cannot ignore that he is the victim of illu--
sions, and that he has laughed or wept over
imaginary adventures. Sometimes, however, the
sentiments suggested by the images are so strong
that they tend, like habitual suggestions, to trans-
form themselves into acts. The story has often
been told of the manager of a popular theatre
who, in consequence of his only playing sombre
dramas, was obliged to have the actor who took
the part of the traitor protected on his leaving the
theatre, to defend him against the violence of the
spectators, indignant at the crimes, imaginary
58 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
though they were, which the traitor had com-
mitted. We have here, in my opinion, one of the
most remarkable indications of the mental state of
crowds, and especially of the facility with which
they are suggestioned. The unreal has almost as
much influence on them as the real. They have
an evident tendency not to distinguish between
the two.
The power of conquerors and the strength of
States is based on the popular imagination. It is
more particularly by working upon this imagina-
tion that crowds are led. All great historical
facts, the rise of Buddhism, of Christianity, of
Islamism, the Reformation, the French Revolution,
and, in our own time, the threatening invasion of
Socialism are the direct or indirect consequences
of strong impressions produced on the imagination
of the crowd. '
Moreover, all the great statesmen of every age
and every country, including the most absolute
despots, have regarded the popular imagination as
the basis of their power, and they have never
attempted to govern in opposition to it " It was
by becoming a Catholic," said Napoleon to the
Council of State, " that I terminated the Vend6en
war. By becoming a Mussulman that I obtained
a footing in Egypt By becoming an Ultramontane
that I won over the Italian priests, and had I to
govern a nation of Jews I would rebuild Solomon's
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROVi'DS. 59
temple." Never perhaps since Alexander and
Caesar has any great man better understood how
the imagination of the crowd should be impressed.
His constant preoccupation was to strike it He
bore it in mind in his victories, in his harangues, in
his speeches, in all his acts. On his deathbed it
was still in his thoughts.
How is the imagination of crowds to be im-
pressed? We shall soon see. Let us confine
ourselves for the moment to saying that the feat
is never to be achieved by attempting to work
upon the intelligence or reasoning faculty, that is
to say, by way of demonstration. It was not by
means of cunning rhetoric that Antony succeeded
in making the populace rise against the murderers
of Caesar ; it was by reading his will to the multi-
tude and pointing to his corpse.
Whatever strikes the imagination of crowds pre-
sents itself under the shape of a startling and very
clear image, freed from all accessory explanation, or
merely having as accompaniment a few marvellous
or mysterious facts : examples in point are a great
victory, a great miracle, a great crime, or a great
hope. Things must be laid before the crowd as
a whole, and their genesis must never be indicated.
A hundred petty crimes or petty accidents will
not strike the imagination of crowds in the least,
whereas a single great crime or a single great acci-
dent will profoundly impress them, even though the
U'
6o THE MIND OF CROWDS,
results be infinitely less disastrous than those of the
hundred small accidents put together. The epi-
demic of influenza, which caused the death but
a few years ago of five thousatid persons in Paris
alone, made very little impression on the popular
imagination. The reason was that this veritable
hecatomb was not embodied in any visible
image, but was only learnt from statistical infor-
mation furnished weekly. An accident which
should have caused the death of only five hundred
instead of five thousand persons, but on the same
day and in public, as the outcome of an accident
appealing strongly to the eye, by the fall, for
instance, of the Eiffel Tower, would have produced,
on the contrary, an immense impression on the
imagination of the crowd. The probable loss of
a transatlantic steamer that was supposed, in the
absence of news, to have gone down in mid-ocean
profoundly impressed the imagination of the crowd
for a whole week. Yet official statistics show that
850 sailing vessels and 203 steamers were lost in
the year 1894 alone. The crowd, however, was
never for a moment concerned by these successive
losses, much more important though they were as
far as regards the destruction of life and property,
than the loss of the Atlantic liner in question
could possibly have been.
It is not, then, the facts in themselves that strike
the popular imagination, but the way in which
THE IDEAS AND IMAGINATION OF CROWDS. 6i
they take place and are brought under notice. It \ /
is necessary that by their condensation, if I may W
thus express myself, they should produce a startling A
image which fills and besets the mind. To know \
the art of impressing the imagination of crowds \
is to know at the same time the art of governing \
them. \
CHAPTER IV.
A RELIGIOUS SHAPE ASSUMED BY ALL THE
CONVICTIONS OF CROWDS.
What is meant by the religious sentiment — It is inde-
pendent of the worship of a divinity — Its charac-
teristics — The strength of convictions assuming a
religious shape—- Various examples — Popular gods
have never disappeared — New forms under which
they are revived — Religious forms of atheism — Im-
portance of these notions from the historical point of
view — The Reformation, Saint Bartholomew, the Terror,
and all analogous events are the result of the religious
sentiments of crowds and not of the will of isolated
individuals.
We have shown that crowds do not reason, that
they accept or reject ideas as a whole, that they
tolerate neither discussion nor contradiction, and
that the suggestions brought to bear on them in-
vade the entire field of their understanding and
tend at once to transform themselves into acts.
We have shown that crowds suitably influenced
are* ready to sacrifice themselves for the ideal with
which they have been inspired. We have also seen
that they only entertain violent and extreme senti-
62
THE CONVICTIONS OF CROWDS, 63
ments, that in their case sympathy quickly be-
comes adoration, and antipathy almost as soon as
it is aroused is transformed into hatred. These
general indications furnish us already with a pre-
sentiment of the nature of the convictions of
crowds.
When these convictions are closely examined,
whether at epochs marked by fervent religious
faith, or by great political upheavals such as those
of the last century, it is apparent that they always
assume a peculiar form which I cannot better
define than by giving it the name of a religious
sentiment.
This sentiment has very simple characteristics^
such as worship of a being supposed superior,
fear of the power with which the being is
credited, blind submission to its commands, in-
ability to discuss its dogmas, the desire to spread
them, and a tendency to consider as enemies all by
whom they are not accepted. Whether such a
sentiment apply to an invisible God, to a wooden
or stone idol, to a hero or to a political conception,
provided that it presents the preceding character-
istics, its essence always remains religious. The
supernatural and the miraculous are found to be
present to the same extent. Crowds unconsciously
accord a mysterious power to the political formula
or the victorious leader that for the moment arouses
their enthusiasm.
>
64 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
A person is not religious solely when he worships
a divinity, but when he puts all the resources of
his mind, the complete submission of his will, and
the whole-souled ardour of fanaticism at the service
of a cause or an individual who becomes the goal
and guide of his thoughts and actions.
Intolerance and fanaticism are the necessary
accompaniments of the religious sentiment. They
are inevitably displayed by those who believe
themselves in the possession of the secret of
■earthly or eternal happiness. These two charac-
teristics are to be found in all men grouped to-
gether when they are inspired by a conviction of
any kind. The Jacobins of the Reign of Terror
were at bottom as religious as the Catholics of the
Inquisition, and their cruel ardour proceeded from
the same source.
The convictions of crowds assume those charac-
teristics of blind submission, fierce intolerance, and
the need of violent propaganda which are inherent
in the religious sentiment, and it is for this reason
that it may be said that all their beliefs have a
religious form. The hero acclaimed by a. crowd is
a veritable god for that crowd. Napoleon was such
a god for fifteen years, and a divinity never had
more fervent worshippers or sent men to their death
with greater ease. The Christian and Pagan Gods
never exercised a more absolute empire over the
minds that had fallen under their sway.
THE CONVICTIONS OF CROWDS. 65
All founders of religious or political creeds have
established them solely because they were success-
ful in inspiring crowds with those fanatical senti-
ments which have as result that 'men find their
happiness in worship and obedience and are ready
to lay down their lives for their idol. This has
been the case at all epochs. Fustel de Coulanges,
in his excellent work on Roman Gaul, justly re-
marks that the Roman Empire was in no wise
maintained by force, but by the religious admira-
tion it inspired. " It would be without a parallel
in the history of the world," he observes rightly,
" that a form of government held in popular detes-
tation should have lasted for five centuries. . . .
It would be inexplicable that the thirty legions of
the Empire should have constrained a hundred
million men to obedience." JThe reason of their
obedience was that the Emperor, who personified
the greatness of Rome, was worshipped like a
divinity by unanimous consent, f There were altars
in honour of the Emperor in the smallest townships
of his realm. " From one end of the Empire to
the other a new religion was seen to arise in those
days which had for its divinities the emperors
themselves. Some years before the Christian era
the whole of Gaul, represented by sixty cities, built
in common a temple near the town of Lyons in
honour of Augustus. ... Its priests, elected by
the united Gallic cities, were the principal per-
6
66 THE MIND OF CROWDS,
sonages in their country. ... It is impossible to
attribute all this to fear and servility. Whole
nations are not servile, and especially for three
centuries. It was not the courtiers who wor-
shipped the prince, it was Rome, and it was not
Rome merely, but it was Gaul, it was Spain, it was
Greece and Asia."
To-day the majority of the great men who have
swayed men's minds no longer have altars, but
they have statues, or their portraits are in the hands
of their admirers, and the cult of which they are the
object is not notably different from that accorded to
their predecessors. An understanding of the philo-
sophy of history is only to be got by a thorough
appreciation of this fundamental point of the
psychology of crowds. The crowd demands a god
before everything else.
It must not be supposed that these are the superr
stitions of a bygone age which reason has definitely
banished. Sentiment has never been vanquished
in its eternal conflict with reason. Crowds will
hear no more of the words divinity and religion, in
whose name they were so long enslaved ; but they
have never possessed so many fetishes as in the
last hundred years, and the old divinities have
never had so many statues and altars raised in their
honour. Those who in recent years have studied
the popular movement known under the name of
Boulangism have been able to see with what ease
THE CONVICTIONS OF CROWDS, 67
the religious instincts of crowds are ready to revive.
There was not a country inn that did not possess
the hero's portrait. He was credited with the
power of remedying all injustices and all evils, and
thousands of men would have given their lives for
him. Great might have been his place in history
had his character been at all on a level with his
legendary reputation.
It is thus a very useless commonplace to assert
that a religion is necessary for the masses, because
all political, divine, and social creeds only take root
among them on the condition of always assuming
the religious sh;ape — a shape which obviates the
danger pil-dlscussion. Were it possible to induce
Jthelnasses to adopt atheism, this belief would ex-
hibit all the intolerant ardour of a religious senti-
ment, and in its exterior forms would soon become^,
a cult. The evolution of the small Positivist sect
furnishes us a curious proof in point What hap-
pened to the Nihilist whose story is related by that
profound thinker . Dostorewsky has quickly hap-
pened to the Positivists. Illumined one day by the
light of reason he broke the images of divinities
and saints that adorned the altar of a chapel, ex-
tinguished the candles, and, without losing a
moment, replaced the destroyed objects by the
works of atheistic philosophers such as Biichner
and Moleschott, after which he piously relighted the
candles. The object of his religious beliefs had
68 THE MIND OF CROWDS.
been transformed, but can it be truthfully said that
his religious sentiments had changed ?
Certain historical events — and they are precisely
the most important — I again repeat, are not to be
understood unless one has attained to an apprecia-
tion of the religious form which the convictions of
crowds always assume in the long run. There are
social phenomena that need to be studied far more
from the point of view of the psychologist than
from that of the naturalist. The great historian
Taine has only studied the Revolution as a natura-
list, and on this account the real genesis of events
has often escaped him. He has perfectly observed
the facts, but from want of having studied the
psychology of crowds he has not always been able
to trace their causes. The facts having appalled
him by their bloodthirsty, anarchic, and ferocious
side, he has scarcely seen in the heroes of the great
drama anything more than a horde of epileptic
savages abandoning themselves without restraint
to their instincts. The violence of the Revolution,
its massacres, its need of propaganda, its declara-
tions of war upon all things, are only to be properly
explained by reflecting that the Revolution was
merely the establishment of a new religious belief
in the mind of the masses. The Reformation, the
massacre of Saint Bartholomew, the French religious
wars, the Inquisition, the Reign of Terror are
phenomena of an identical kind, brought about by
\
THE CONVICTIONS OF CROWDS. 69
crowds animated by those religious sentiments
which necessarily lead those imbued with them to
pitilessly extirpate by fire and sword whoever is
opposed to the establishment of the new faith.
The methods of the Inquisition are those of all
whose convictions are genuine and sturdy. Their
convictions would not deserve these epithets did
they resort to other methods.
Upheavals analogous to those I have just cited
are only possible wh erL it is the soul of the masses/ *
that brings them about. The most absolute despots
could not cause them. When historians tell us that
the massacre of Saint Bartholomew was the work
of a Jcing, they show themselves as ignorant of the
psychology of crowds as of that of sovereigns.
Manifestatio ns of this order can only proceed fro m
the soul of crowds^ The most absolute power of
the most despotic monarch can scarcely do more
than hasten or retard the moment of their appari-
tion. The massacre of Saint Bartholomew or the
religious wars were no more the work of kings
than the Reign of Terror was the work of Robe-
spierre, Danton, or Saint Just. At the bottom of
such events is always to be found the working
of the soul of the masses and never the power of
potentates.
Ffij ^^-
BOOK II.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
CHAPTER I.
REMOTE FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS
OF CROWDS.
I^reparatory factors of the beliefs of crowds — ^The origin
of the beliefs of crowds is the consequence of a
preliminary process of elaboration — Study of the
different factors of these beliefs. § i. Race. The pre-
dominating influence it exercises — It represents the
suggestions of ancestors. § 2. Traditions. They are
the synthesis of the soul of the race — Social import-
ance of traditions — How, after having been necessary',
• they become harmful — Crowds are the most obstinate
maintainers of traditional ideas. § 3. Time. It pre-
pares in succession the establishment of beliefs and
then their destruction. It is by the aid of this factor
that order may proceed from chaos. § 4. Political and
Social Institutions. Erroneous idea of their part — ^Their
influence extremely weak — They are,^ffects^ not causes
— Nations are incapable of choosing what appearTb
them the best institutions — Institutions are labels which
shelter the most dissimilar things under the same title
— How institutions may come to be created — Certain
institutions theoretically bad, such as centralisation
obligatory for certain nations. § 5. Institutions and
70
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 71
education. Falsity of prevalent ideas as to the influence
of instruction on crowds — Statistical indications — De-
moralising effect of Latin system of education — Part
instruction might play — Examples furnished by various
peoples.
Having studied the mental constitution of crowds
and become acquainted with their modes of feeling,
thinking, and reasoning, we shall now proceed to
examine how their opinions and beliefs arise and 1
become established.
The factors which determine these opinions and
beliefs are of two kinds : remote facfawB and im-
mediate factors.
The remote factors are those which render
crowds capable of adopting certain convictions and
absolutely refractory to the acceptance of others.
These factors prepare the ground in which are
suddenly seen to germinate certain new ideas whose
force and consequences are a cause of astonishment,
though they are only spontaneous in appearance.
The outburst and putting in practice of certain
ideas among crowds present at times a startling
suddenness. This is only a superficial effect,
behind which must be sought a preliminary and
preparatory action of long duration.
The immediate factors are those which, coming on
the top of this long, preparatory working, in whose
absence they would remain without effect, serve as
the source of active persuasion on crowds ; that is,
they are the factors which cause the idea to take
72 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
shape and set it loose with all its consequences.
The resolutions by which collectivities are suddenly
carried away arise out of these immediate factors ;
it is due to them that a riot breaks out or a strike
is decided upon, and to them that enormous majori-
ties invest one man with power to overthrow a
government.
The successive action of these two kinds of
factors is to be traced in all great historical events.
The French Revolution — to cite but one of the
most striking of such events — ^had among ifs
remote factors the writings of the philosophers, the
exactions of the nobility, and the progress of scien-
tific thought. The mind of the masses, thus pre-
pared, was then easily roused by such immediate
factors as the speeches of orators, and the resistance
of the court party to insignificant reforms.
Among the remote factors there are some of a
general nature, which are found to underlie all the
beliefs and opinions of crowds. They are race^
traditions, time, institutions, and education.
We now proceed to study the influence of these
different factors.
§ I. Race.
This factor, race, must be placed in the first rank,
for in itself it far surpasses in importance all the
others. We have sufficiently studied it in another
work ; it is therefore needless to deal with it again.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 73
We showed, in a previous volume, what an historical
race is, and how, its character once formed, it pos-
sesses, as the result of the laws of heredity such
power that its beliefs, institutions, and arts — in a
word, all the elements of its civilisation — are merely
the outward expression of its genius. We showed
that the power of the race is such that no element
can pass from one people to another without under-
going the most profound transformations.^
Environment, circumstances, and events represent I
the social suggestions of the moment. They may \
have a considerable influence, but this influence is
always momentary if it be contrary to the sugges-
tions of the race ; that is, to those which are inherited
by a nation from the entire series of its ancestors.
We shall have occasion in several of the chapters
of this work to touch again upon racial influence,
and to show that this influence is so great that it
dominates the characteristics peculiar to the genius
of crowds. It follows from this fact that the crowds
of different countries offer very considerable differ-
ences of beliefs and conduct and are not to be in-
fluenced in the same manner.
' The novelty of this proposition being still considerable
and history being quite unintelligible without itj I devoted
four chapters to its demonstration in my last book (" The
Psychological Laws of the Evolution of Peoples"). From it
the reader will see that, in spite of fallacious appearances^
neither language, religion, arts, or, in a word, any element
of civilisation, can pass, intact, from one people to another.
74 the opinions and beliefs of crowds.
§ 2. Traditions.
Traditions represent the ideas, the needs, and the
sentiments of the past. They are the synthesis of
the race, and weigh upon us with immense force.
The biological sciences have been transformed
since embryology has shown the immense influence
of the past on the evolution of living beings ; and
the historical sciences will not undergo a less change
when this conception has become more widespread.
As yet it is not sufficiently general, and many
statesmen are still no further advanced than the
theorists of the last century, who believed that a
society could break off with its past and be entirely
recast on lines suggested solely by the light of
reason.
\ A people is an organism created by the past, and,
like every other organism, it can only be modified
by slow hereditary accumulations.
It is tradition that guides men, and more especi-
ally so when they are in a crowd. The changes they
can effect in their traditions with any ease, merely
bear, as I have often repeated, upon names and
outward forms.
This circumstance is not to be regretted. Neither
a national genius nor civilisation would be possible
without traditions. In consequence man's two great
concerns since he has existed have been to create
a network of traditions which he afterwards en-
deavours to destroy when their beneficial effects
I
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS, 75
have worn themselves out. Civilisation is im-
possible without traditions, and progress impossible
without the destruction of those traditions. The
difficulty, and it is an immense difficulty, is to find
a proper equilibrium between stability and varia-
bility. Should a people allow its customs to
become too firmly rooted, it can no longer
change, and becomes, like_ Chin a, incapable of
improvement. Violent revolutions are in this
case of no avail ; for what happens is that either
the broken fragments of the chain are pieced to-
gether again and the past resumes its empire with-
out change, or the fragments remain apart and
decadence soon succeeds anar chy.
The ideal for a people is in consequence to pre-
serve the institutions of the past, merely changing
them insensibly and little by little. This ideal is
difficult to realise. The Romans in ancient and
the English in modern times are almost alone in
having realised it.
It is precisely crowds that cling the most tena-
ciously to traditional ideas and oppose their being
changed with the most obstinacy. This is notably
the case with the category of crowds constituting
castes. I have already insisted upon the conserva-
tive spirit of crowds, and shown that the most
violent rebellions merely end in a changing of
words anGT terms. At the end of the last century,
in the presence of destroyed churches, of priests
76 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
expelleoAthe country or guillotined, it might have
been thought that the old religious ideas had lost
all their strength, and yet a few years had barely
lapsed before the abolished system of public
worship had to be re-established in deference to
universal demands.'
Blotted out for a moment, the old traditions had
resumed their sway.
No example could better display the power of
tradition on the mind of crowds. The most re-
doubtable idols do not dwell in temples, nor the
most despotic tyrants in palaces ; both the one and
the other can be broken in ah instant But the
invisible masters that reign in our innermost selves
are safe from every effort at revolt, and only yield
to the slow wearing away of centuries.
* The report of the ex-Conventionist, Fourcroy, quoted
by Taine, is very clear on this point.
" What is everywhere seen with respect to the keeping
of Sunday and attendance at the churches proves that the
majority of Frenchmen desire to return to their old usages,
and that it is no longer opportune to resist this natural
tendency. . . . The great majority of men stand in need of
religion, public worship, and priests. // is an error of some
modern philosophers^ by which I myself have been led away, to
believe in the possibility of instruction being so general as
to destroy religious prejudices, which for a great numbei' of
unfortunate persons are a source of consolation. . . . The
mass of the people, then, must be allowed its priests, its
altars, and its public worship."
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 77
§ 3. Time.
In social as in biological problems time is one
of the most energetic factors. It is the sole real ,
creator and the sole great destroyer. It is time
that has made mountains with grains of sand and
raised the obscure cell of geological eras to human
dignity. The action of centuries is sufficient to
transform any given phenomenon. It has been
justly observed that an ant with enough time at
its disposal could level Mount Blanc. A being
possessed of the magical force of varying time at
his will would have the power attributed by believers
to God.
In this place, however, we have only to concern
ourselves with the i nfluence^ of time on the g enesis^
ofthe^oginions of crowds. Its action from this
point of view is still immense. Dependent upon
it are the great forces such as race^ which cannot
form themselves without it It causes the birth,
the growth, and the death of all beliefs. It is by
the aldTof time that they acquire their strength and
also by its aid^that they lose it
It is time in particular that prepares the opinions
and beliefs of crowds, or at least the soil on which
they will germinate. This is why certain ideas are
realisable at one epoch and not at another. It is
time that accumulates that immense detritus of
beliefs and thoughts on which the ideas of a given
period spring up. They do not grow at hazard
78 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS,
and by chance ; the roots of each of them strike
down into a long past. When they blossom it is
time that has prepared their blooming ; and to
arrive at a notion of their genesis it is always back
in the past that it is necessary to search. They
are the daughters of the past and the mothers of
the future, but throughout the slaves of time.
Time, in consequence, is our veritable master, and
it suffices to leave it free to act to see all things
transformed. At the present day we are very
uneasy with regard to the threatening aspirations
of the masses and the destructions and upheavals
foreboded thereby. Time, without other aid, will
see to the restoration of equilibrium. " No form of
government," M. Lavisse very properly writes, "was
founded in a day. Political and social organisations
are works that demand centuries. The feudal
system existed for centuries in a shapeless, chaotic
state before it found its laws ; absolute monarchy
also existed for centuries before arriving at regular
methods of government, and these periods of
expectancy were extremely troubled."
A § 4. Political and Social Institutions.
The idea that institutions can remedy the defects
of societies, that national progress is the conse-
quence of the improvement of institutions and
governments, and that social changes can be
effected by decrees — ^this idea, I say, is still gene-
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 79
rally accepted. It was the starting-point of the
French Revolution, and the social theories of the
present day are based upon it
The most continuous experience has been un-
successful in shaking this grave delusion. Philo-
sophers and historians have endeavoured in vain
to prove its absurdity, but yet they have had no
difficulty in demonstrating that institutions are
the outcome of ideas, sentiments, and customs,
and that ideas, sentiments, and customs are not to
be recast by recasting legislative codes. A nation
does not choose its institutions at will any more
than it chooses the colour of its hair or its eyes.
Institutions and governments are the product of
the race. They are not the creators of an epoch,
but are created by it. Peoples are not governed
in accordance with their caprices of the moment, but
as their character determines that they shall be
governed. Centuries are required to form a political
system and centuries needed to change it. Insti-
tutions have no intrinsic virtue : in themselves they
are neither good nor bad. Those which are good
at a given moment for a given people may be
harmful in the extreme for another nation.
Moreover, it is in no way in the power of a
people to really change its institutions. Un-
doubtedly, at the cost of violent revolutions, it can
change their name, but in their essence they remain
unmodified. The names are mere futile labels with
8o THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
•
which an historian who goes to the bottom of
things need scarcely concern himself. It is in this
way, for instance, that England,^ the most demo-
cratic country in the world, lives, nevertheless,
under a monarchical rdgime^ whereas the countries
in which the most oppressive despotism is rampant
are the Spanish-American Republics, in spite of
their republican constitutions. TJie destinies of
peoples are determined by their character and not
by their government I have endeavoured to
s! establish this view in my previous volume by
setting forth categorical examples.
To lose time in the manufacture of cut-and-dried
constitutions is, in consequence, a puerile task, the
useless labour of an ignorant rhetorician. Necessity
and time undertake the charge of elaborating con-
stitutions when we are wise enough to allow these
two factors to act This is the plan the Anglo-
Saxons have adopted, as their great historian,
Macaulay, teaches us in a passage that the poli-
ticians of all Latin countries ought to learn by
* The most advanced republicans, even of the United
States, recognise this fact. The American magazine, The
Forum, recently gave categorical expression to the opinion
in terms which I reproduce here from the Review of Reviews
for December, 1894 : —
" It should never be forgotten, even by the most ardent
enemies of an aristocracy, that England is to-day the
most democratic country of the universe, the country in
which the rights of the individual are most respected, and
in which the individual possesses the most liberty."
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS, 8i
heart. After having shown all the good that can
be accomplished by laws which appear from the
point of view of pure reason a chaos of absurdities
and contradictions, he compares the scores of con-
stitutions that have been engulphed in the convul-
sions of the Latin peoples with that of England,
and points out that the latter has only been very
slowly changed part by part, under the influence
of immediate necessities and never of speculative
reasoning.
" To think nothing of symmetry and much of
convenience ; never to remove an anomaly merely
because it is an anomaly ; never to innovate except
when some grievance is felt ; never to innovate
except so far as to get rid of the grievance ;
never to lay down any proposition of wider
extent than the particular case for which it is
necessary to provide ; these are the rules which
have, from the age of John to the age of Victoria,
generally guided the deliberations of our two
hundred and fifty Parliaments."
It would be necessary to take one by one the
laws and institutions of each people to show to
what extent they are the expression of the needs
of each race and are incapable, for that reason, of
being violently transformed. It is possible, for
instance, to indulge in philosophical dissertations
on the advantages and disadvantages of centrali-
7
82 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
sation ; but when we see a people composed of
very different races devote a thousand years of
efforts to attaining to this centralisation ; when we
observe that a great revolution, having for object
the destruction of all the institutions of the past,
has been forced to respect this centralisation, and
has even strengthened it; under these circumstances
we should admit that it is the outcome of imperious
needs, that it is a condition of the existence of
the nation in question, and we should pity the
poor mental range of politicians who talk of de-
stroying it. Could they by chance succeed in this
attempt, their success would at once be the signal
for a frightful civil war,^ which, moreover, would
immediately bring back a new system of centrali-
sation much more oppressive than the old.
* If a comparison be made between the profound religi-
ous and political dissensions which separate the various
parties in France, and are more '.especially the result of
social questions, and the scjparatist tendencies which were
manifested at the time of the Revolution, and began to
again display themselves towards the close of the Franco-
German war, it will be seen that the different races
represented in France are still far from being com-
pletely blended. The vigorous centralisation of the
Revolution and the creation of artificial departments des-
tined to bring about the fusion of the ancient provinces
was certainly its most useful work. Were it possible to
bring about the decentralisation which is to-day preoccu-
pying minds lacking in foresight, the achievement would
promptly have for consequence the most sanguinary dis-
orders. To overlook this fact is' to leave out of account
the entire history of France.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 83
The conclusion to be drawn from what precedes
is, that it is not in institutions that the means is
to be sought of profoundly influencing the genius
of the masses. When we see certain countries,
such as the United States, reach a high degree of
prosperity under democratic institutions, while
others, such as the Spanish-American Republics,
are found existing in a pitiable state of anarchy
under absolutely similar institutions, we should
admit that these institutions are as foreign to the
greatness of the one as to the decadence of the
others. Peoples are governed by their character,
and all institutions which are not intimately
modelled on that character merely represent a
borrowed garment, a transitory disguise. No
doubt sanguinary wars and violent revolutions
have been undertaken, and will continue to be
undertaken, to impose institutions, to which is
attributed, as to the relif^ of saints, the super-
natural power of creating welfare. It may be said,
then, in one sense, that institutions react on the
mind of the crowd inasmuch as they engender
such upheavals. But in reality it is not the insti-
tutions that react in this manner, since we know
that, whether triumphant or vanquished, they possess
in themselves no virtue. It is illusions and words
that have influenced the mind of the crowd, and
especially words — words which are as powerful as
they are chimerical, and whose astonishing sway
we shall shortly demonstrate.
84 the opinions and beliefs of crowds.
§ 5. Instruction and Education.
Foremost among the dominant ideas of the
present epoch is to be found the notion that
instruction is capable of considerably changing
men, and has for its unfaihng consequence to
improve them and even to make them equal.
By the mere fact of its being constantly repeated,
this assertion has ended by becoming one of the
most steadfast democratic dogmas. It would be
as difficult now to attack it as it would have
been formerly to have attacked the dogmas of
the Church.
On this point, however, as on many others,
democratic ideas are in profound disagreement
with the results of psychology and experience.
Many eminent philosophers, among them Herbert
Spencer, have had no difficulty in showing that
instruction neither renders a man more moral nor
happier, that it changjp neither his instincts nor
his hereditary passions, and that at times — for
this to happen it need only be badly directed — it is
much more pernicious than useful. Statisticians
have brought confirmation of these views by telling
•us(J^at criminality increases with the generalisa-
tion of instruction) or at any rate of a certain kind
of instruction, anc/^that the worst enemies of society,
the anarchists, are recruited among the prize-
winners of schoolsN while in a recent work a dis-
tinguished magistrate, M. Adolphe Guillot, made
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 85
the observation that Jat- present 3,000 educated
criminals are met with for every 1,000 illiterate
delinquents,! and that In fifty years the criminal
percentage of the population has passed from 227
to 552 for every 100,000 inhabitant^ an increase of
133 per cent He has also noted in common with
his colleagues that criminality is particularly on the
increase among young persons, for whom, as is
known, gratuitous and obligatory schooling has — in
France — replaced apprenticeship.
It is not assuredly — ^and nobody has ever main-
tained this proposition — that well-directed instruc-
tion may not give very useful practical results, if
not in the sense of raising the standard of morality,
at least in that of developing professional capacity.
Unfortunately the Latin peoples, especially in the
last tweny-five years, have based their systems of
instruction on very erroneous principles, and in
spite of the observations of the most eminent
minds, such as Br^al, Fustel de Coulanges, Taine,
and many others, they persist in their lamentable
mistakes. I have myself shown, in a work pub-
lished some time ago, that the French system
of education transforms the majority of those
who have undergone it into enemies of society,
and recruits numerous disciples for the worst
forms of socialism.
The primary danger of this system of education
— very properly qualified as Latin — consists in the
86 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS,
fact that it is based on the fundamental psycho-
logical error that the intelligence is developed by
the learning by heart of text-books. Adopting
this view, the endeavour has been made to enforce
a knowledge of as many hand-books as possible.
From the primary school till he leaves the
university a young man does nothing but acquire
books by heart without his judgment or personal
initiative being ever called into play. Educa-
tion consists for him in reciting by heart and
obeying.
"Learning lessons, knowing by heart a grammar
or a compendium, repeating well and imitating well
— that," writes a former Minister of Public Instruc-
tion, M. Jules Simon, " is a ludicrous form of
education whose every effort is an act of faith
tacitly admitting the infallibility of the master,
and whose only results are a belittling of ourselves
and a rendering of us impotent"
Were this education merely useless, one might
confine one's self to expressing compassion for the
unhappy children who, instead of making needful
studies at the primary school, are instructed in
the genealogy of the sons of Clotaire, the conflicts
between Neustria and Austrasia, or zoological
classifications. But the system presents a far more
serious danger. It gives those who have been
submitted to it a violent dislike to the state of
life in which they were born, and an intense
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 87
desire to escape from it. The working man no
longer wishes to remain a working man, or the
peasant to continue a peasant, while the most
humble members of the middle classes admit of
no possible career for their sons except that of
State-paid functionaries. Instead of preparing
men for life French schools solely prepare them
to occupy public functions, in which success can
be attained without any necessity for self-direction
or the exhibition of the least glimmer of personal
initiative. At the bottom of the social ladder the
system creates an army of proletarians discon-
tented with their lot and always ready to revolt,
while at the summit it brings into being a frivolous
bourgeoisie, at once sceptical and credulous, having
a superstitious confidence in the State, whom it
regards as a sort of Providence, but without for-
getting to display towards it a ceaseless hostility,
always laying its own faults to the door of the
Government, and incapable of the least enterprise
without the intervention of the authorities.
The State, which manufactures by dint of text-
books all these persons possessing diplomas, can
only utilise a small number of them, and is forced
to leave the others without employment It is
obliged in consequence to resign itself to feeding
the first mentioned and to having the others as
its enemies. From the top to the bottom of the
social pyramid, from the humblest clerk to the
88 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
professor and the prefect, the immense mass of
persons boasting diplomas besiege the professions.
While a business man has the greatest difficulty
in finding an agent to represent him in the
colonies, thousands of candidates solicit the most
modest official posts. There are 20,000 school-
masters and mistresses without employment in
the department of the Seine alone, all of them
persons who, disdaining the fields or the work-
shops, look to the State for their livelihood. The
number of the chosen being restricted, that of the
discontented is perforce immense. The latter
are ready for any revolution, whoever be its chiefs
and whatever the goal they aim at. The acquisi-
tion of knowledge for which no use can be found
is a sure method of driving a man to revolt.^
' This phenomenon, moreover, is not peculiar to the
Latin peoples. It is also to be observed in China, which
is also a country in the hands of a solid hierarchy of
mandarins or functionaries, and where a function is
obtained, as in France, by competitive examination, in
which the only test is the imperturbable recitation of
bulky manuals. The army of educated persons without
employment is considered in China at the present day
as a veritable national calamity. It is the same in India,
where, since the English have opened schools, not for
educating purposes, as is the case in England itself, but
simply to furnish the indigenous inhabitants with instruc-
tion, there has been formed a special class of educated
persons, the Baboos, who, when they do not obtain
employment, become the irreconcilable enemies of the
English rule. In the case of all the Baboos, whether
provided with employment or not, the first effect of their
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 89
It is evidently too late to retrace our steps.
Experience alone, that supreme educator of
peoples, will be at pains to show us our mistake.
It alone will be powerful enough to prove the
necessity of replacing our odious text-books and
our pitiable examinations by industrial instruc-
tion capable of inducing our young men to
return to the fields, to the workshop, and to the
colonial enterprise which they avoid to-day at all
costs.
The professional instruction which all enlight-
ened minds are now demanding was the instruc-
tion received in the past by our forefathers. It
is still in vigour at the present day among the
nations who rule the world by their force of will,
their initiative, and their spirit of enterprise. In
a series of remarkable pages, whose principal
passages I reproduce further on, a great ,.jthinker,
M. Taine, has clearly shown that our former
system of education was approximately that in
vogue to-day in England and America, and in a
remarkable parallel between the Latin and Anglo-
Saxon systems he has plainly pointed out the
consequences of the two methods.
One might consent, perhaps, at a pinch, to
instruction has been tb lower their standard of morality.
This is a fact on which I have insisted at length in my
book, " The Civilisations of India " — a fact, too, which has
been observed by all authors who have visited the great
peninsula.
90 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS,
continue to accept all the disadvantages of our
classical education, although it produced nothing
but discontented men, and men unfitted for their
station in life, did the superficial acquisition of so
much knowledge, the faultless repeating by heart
of so many text-books, raise the level of intelli-
gence. But does it really raise this level ? Alas,
no! The conditions of success in life are the
possession of judgment, experience, initiative, and
character — qualities which are not bestowed by
IT books. Books are dictionaries, which it is useful
t II to consult, but of which it is perfectly useless to
1 1 have lengthy portions in one's head.
How is it possible for professional instruction to
develop the intelligence in a measure quite beyond
the reach of classical instruction ? This has been
well shown by M. Taine.
" Ideas, he says, are only formed in their natural
and normal surroundings ; the promotion of the
growth is effected by the innumerable impres-
sions appealing to the senses which a young
man receives daily in the workshop, the mine,
the law court, the study, the builder's yard, the
hospital ; at the sight of tools, materials, and
operations ; in the presence of customers, workers,
and labour, of work well or ill done, costly or
lucrative. In such a way are obtained those
trifling perceptions of detail of the eyes, the ear.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 91
the hands, and even the sense of smell, which,
picked up involuntarily, and silently elaborated,
take shape within the learner, and suggest to him
sooner or, later this or that new combination,
simplification, economy, improvement, or inven-
tion. The young Frenchman is deprived, and
precisely at the age when they are most fruitful,
of all these precious contacts, of all these indis-
pensable elements of assimilation. For seven or
eight years on end he is shut up in a school, and
is cut off from that direct personal experience
which would give him a keen and exact notion of
men and things and of the various ways of hand-
ling them."
"... At least nine out of ten have wasted
their time and pains during several years of their
life — telling, important, even decisive years.
Among such are to be counted, first of all, the half
or two-thirds of those who present themselves for
examination — I refer to those who are rejected ;
and then among those who are successful, who
obtain a degfree, a certificate, a diploma, there is
still a half or two-thirds — I refer to the over-
worked. Too much has been demanded of them
by exacting that on a given day, on a chair or
before a board, they should, for two hours in
succession, and with respect to a group of
sciences, be living repertories of all human know-
92 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
ledge. In point of fact they were that, or nearly
so, for two hours on that particular day, but a
month later they are so no longer. They could
not go through the examination again. Their
too numerous and too burdensome acquisitions
slip incessantly from their mind, and are not
replaced. Their mental vigour has declined, their
fertile capacity for growth has dried up, the fully-
developed man appears, and he is often a used up
man. Settled down, married, resigned to turning
in a circle, and indefinitely in the same circle, he
shuts himself up in his confined function, which
he fulfils adequately, but nothing more. Such is
the average yield : assuredly the receipts do not
balance the expenditure. In England or America,
where, as in France previous to 1789, the contrary
proceeding is adopted, the outcome obtained is
equal or superior."
«
Thtfillustrious psychologist subsequently shows
us the difference between our system and that of
the Anglo-Saxons. The latter do not possess our
innumerable special schools. With them instruc-
tion is not based on book-learning, but on object
lessons. The engineer, for example, is trained in
a workshop, and never at a school, a method
which allows of each individual reaching the level
his intelligence permits of. He becomes a work-
man or a foreman if he can get no further, an
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 93
engineer if his aptitudes take him as far. This
manner of proceeding is much more democratic
and of niu ch grea ter benefit to society than that
of making the whole career of an i ndivid ual
depend on an exaimnation, lasting a few houi
and undergone at the age of nineteen or twenty.
" In the hospital, the mine, the factory, in the
architect's or the lawyer's office, the student, who
makes a start while very young, goes through his
apprenticeship, stage by stage, much as does with
us a law clerk in his office, or an artist in his
studio. Previously, and before making a practical
beginning, he has had an opportunity of following
some general and summary course of instruction,
so as to have a framework ready prepared in
which to store the observations he is shortly to
make. Furthermore he is able, as a rule, to
avail himself of sundry technical courses which
he can follow in his leisure hours, so as to co-
ordinate step by step the daily experience he is
gathering. Under such a system the practical
capabilities increase and develop of themselves
in exact proportion to the faculties of the student,
and in the direction requisite for his future task
and the special work for which from now onwards
he desires to fit himself By this means in
England or the United States a young man is
quickly in a position to develop his capacity to
^
94 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
the utmost. At twenty-five years of age, and
much sooner if the material and the parts are
there, he is not merely a useful performer, he is
capable also of spontaneous enterprise; he is
not only a part of a machine, but also a motor.
In France, where the contrary system prevails — in
France, which with each succeeding generation is
falling more and more into line with China — the
sum total of the wasted forces is enormous."
The great philosopher arrives at the following
conclusion with respect to the growing incongruity
between our Latin system of education and the
requirements of practical life : —
" In the three stages of instruction, those of
childhood, adolescence and youth, the theoretical
and pedagogic preparation by books on the school
benches has lengthened out and become over-
charged in view of the examination, the degree,
the diploma, and the certificate, and solely in this
view, and by the worst methplds, by the application
of an unnatural and anti-stjcial rigifnCy by the
excessive postponement of ihe practical appren-
ticeship, by our boarding-school system, by arti-
ficial training and mechanical cramming, by
overwork, without thought for the time that is
to follow, for the adult age and the functions of
the man, without regard for the real world on
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 95
which the young man will shortly be thrown, for
the society in which we move and to which he
must be adapted or be taught to resign himself in
advance, for the struggle in which humanity is
engaged, and in which to defend himself and to
keep his footing he ought previously to have been
equipped, armed, trained, and hardened. This
indispensable equipment, this acquisition of more
importance than any other, this sturdy common
sense and nerve and will-power our schools do not
procure the young Frenchman ; on the contrary,
far from qualifying him for his approaching and
definite state, they disqualify him. In consequence,
his entry into the world and his first steps in the
field of action are most often merely a succession
of painful falls, whose effect is that he long
remains wounded and bruised, and sometimes
disabled for life. The test is severe and dan-
gerous. In the course of it the mental and moral
equilibrium is affected, and runs the risk of not
being re-established. Too sudden and complete
disillusion has supervened. The deceptions have
been too great, the disappointments too keen." '
' Taine, " Le Regime moderne," vol. ii., 1894. These
pages are almost the last that Taine wrote. They resume
admirably the results of the great philosopher's long expe-
rience. Unfortunately they are in my opinion totally
incomprehensible for such of our university professors who
have not lived abroad. Education is the only means at our
disposal of influencing to some extent the mind of a
96 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
Have we digressed in what precedes from the
psychology of crowds? Assuredly not. If we
desire to understand the ideas and beliefs that are
germinating to-day in the masses, and will spring
up to-morrow, it is necessary to know how the
ground has been prepared. The instruction given
the youth of a country allows of a knowledge of
what that country will one day be. The education
accorded the present generation justifies the most
gloomy previsions. It is in part by instruction
and education that the mind of the masses is
improved or deteriorated. It was necessary in
consequence to show how this mind has been
nation, and it is profoundly saddening to have to think
that there is scarcely any one in France who can arrive at
understanding that our present system of teaching is a
grave cause of rapid decadence, which instead of elevating
our youth, lowers and perverts it.
A useful comparison may be made between Taine's pages
and the observations on American education recently made
by M. Paul Bourget in his excellent book, " Outre-Mer."
He, too, after having noted that our education merely
produces narrow-minded bourgeois, lacking in initiative
and will-power, or anarchists — " those two equally harmful
types of the civilised man, who degenerates into impotent
platitude or insane destructiveness " — he too, I say, draws
a comparison that cannot be the object of too much re-
flection between our French lycees (public schools), those
factories of degeneration, and the American schools, which
prepare a man admirably for life. The gulf existing
between truly democratic nations and those who have
democracy in their speeches, but in no wise in their
thoughts, is clearly brought out in this comparison.
THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS. 97
fashioned by the system in vogue, and how the
mass of the indifferent and the neutral has become
progressively an army of the discontented ready to
obey all the suggestions of Utopians and rhetori-
cians. It is in the schoolroom that socialists and
anarchists are found nowadays, and that the way is
being paved for the approaching period of decadence
for the Latin peoples.
8
CHAPTER II,
THE IMMEDIATE FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF
CROWDS.
a
§ I. Images, words and formulce. The magical power of
words and formulae — ^The power of words bound up
with the images they evoke, and independent of their
real sense — ^These images vary from age to age, and
from race to race — The wear and tear of words —
Examples of the consiaerable variations of sense of
much-used words — ^The political utility of baptizing old
things with new names when the words by which they
were designated produced an unfavourable impression
on the masses — ^Variations of the sense of words in
consequence of race differences — ^The different mean-
ings of the word "democracy" in Europe and America.
§ 2. Illusions, Their importance — ^They are to be
found at the root of all civilisations — ^The social neces-
sity of illusions — Crowds always prefer them ta truths.
§ 3. Experience. Experience alone can fix in the
mind of crowds truths become necessary and destroy
illusions grown dangerous — Experience is only effec-
tive on the condition that it be frequently repeated —
The cost of the experiences requisite to persuade
crowds. § 4. Rea^n, The nullity of its influence on
crowds — Crowds only to be influenced by their uncon-
scious sentiments — ^The rdle of logic in history — ^The
secret causes of improbable events.
We have just investigated the remote and pre-
paratory factors which give the mind of crowds
9«
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. 99
a special receptivity, and make possible therein
the growth of certain sentiments and certain
ideas. It now remains for us to study the
factors capable of acting in a direct manner. We
shall see in a forthcoming chapter how these
factors should be put in force in order that they
may produce their full effect ^ ;
In the first part of this work we studied the
sentiments, ideas, and methods of reasoning of
collective bodies, and from the knowledge thus
acquired it would evidently be possible to deduce
in a general way the means of making an impreb-
sion on their mind. We already know what strikes
the imagination of crowds, and are acquainted with
the power and contagiousness of suggestions, of
those especially that are presented under the forrti
of images. However, as suggestions may proceed
from very different sources, the factors capable 6f
acting on the minds of crowds may differ consider*
ably. It is necessary, then, to study them sepaA
rately. This is not a useless study. Crowds are \
somewhat like the sphinx of ancient fable : it is \
necessary to arrive at a solution of the problems \
offered by their psychology or to resign ourselves
to being devoured by them. \
§ I. Images, Words, and Formulas.
When studying the imagination of crowds we
saw that it is particularly open to the impressions
\
loo THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
produced by images. These images do not always
lie ready to hand, but it is possible to evoke them
by the judicious employment of words and for-
mulas. Handled with art, they possess in sober
truth the mysterious power formerly attributed to
them by the adepts of magic. They cause the
birth in the minds of crowds of the most for-
midable tempests, which in turn they are capable
of stilling. A pyramid far loftier than that of old
Cheops could be raised merely with the bones of
men who have been victims of the power of words
and formulas.
The power of words is bound up with the images
they evoke, and is quite independent of their real
significance. Words whose sense is the most ill-
defined are sometimes those that possess the most
influence. Such, for example, are the terms
democracy, socialism, equality, liberty, &c., whose
meaning is so vague that bulky volumes do not
suffice to precisely fix it. Yet it is certain that a
truly magical power is attached to those short
syllables, as if they contained the solution of ^11
problems. They synthesise the most diverse un-
conscious aspirations and the hope of their realisa-
tion.
Reason and arguments are incapable of com- ,
batting certain words and formulas. They are I
uttered with solemnity in the presence of crowds,
and as soon as they have been pronounced an
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. loi
expression of respect is visible on every coun-
tenance, and all heads are bowed. By many they
are considered as natural forces, as supernatural
powers. They evoke grandiose and vague images
in men's minds, but this very vagueness that wraps
them in obscurity augments their mysterious power.
They are the mysterious divinities hidden behind
the tabernacle, which the devout only approach in
fear and trembling.
The images evoked by words being independent
of their sense, they vary from age to age and from
people to people, the formulas remaining identical.
Certain transitory images are attached to certain
words : the word is merely as it were the button of
an electric bell that calls them up.
All words and all formulas do not possess the
power of evoking images, while there are some
which have once had this power, but lose it in the
course of use, and cease to waken any response in
the mind. They then become vain sounds, whose
principal utility is to relieve the person who
employs them of the obligation of thinking.
Armed with a small stock of formulas and com-
monplaces learnt while we are young, we possess
all that is needed to traverse life without the tiring
necessity of having to reflect on anything what-
ever.
If any particular language be studied, it is seen
that the words of which it is composed change
102 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
rather slowly in the course of ages, while the
images these words evoke or the meaning attached
to them changes ceaselessly. This is the reason
why, in another work, I have arrived at the conclu-
sion that the absolute translation of a language,
especially of a dead language, is totally impossible.
What do we do in reality when we substitute a
French for a Latin, Greek, or Sanscrit expression,
or even when we endeavour to understand a book
written in our own tongue two or three centuries
back ? We merely put the images and ideas with
which modem life has endowed our intelligence in
the place of absolutely distinct notions and images
which ancient life had brought into being in the
mind of races submitted to conditions of existence
having no analogy with our own. When the men
of the Revolution imagined they were copying the
Greeks and Romans, what were they doing except
giving to ancient words a sense the latter had
never had ? What resemblance can possibly exist
between the institutions of the Greeks and those
designated to-day by corresponding words? A
republic at that epoch was an essentially aristo-
cratic institution, formed of a reunion of petty
despots ruling over a crowd of slaves kept in
the most absolute subjection. These communal
aristocracies, based on slavery, could not have
existed for a moment without it.
The word "liberty," again, what signification could
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. 103
it have in any way resembling that we attribute
to it to-day at a period when the possibility of the
liberty of thought was not even suspected, and
when there was no greater and more exceptional
crime than that of discussing the gods, the laws
and the customs of the city? What did such a
word as "fatherland" signify to an Athenian or
Spartan unless it were the cult of Athens or
Sparta, and in no wise that of Greece, composed of
rival cities always at war with each other ? What
meaning had the same word "fatherland" among the
ancient Gauls, divided into rival tribes and races,
and possessing different languages and rdigions,
and who were easily vanquished by Caesar because
he always found allies among them? It was
Rome that made a country of Gaul by endowing it
with political and religious unity. Without going
back so far, scarcely two centuries ago, is it to be
believed that this same notion of a fatherland was
conceived to have the same meaning as at present
by French princes like the great Cond6, who allied
themselves with the foreigner against their sove-
reign ? And yet again, the same word had it not
a sense very different from the modem for the
French royalist emigrants, who thought they
obeyed the laws of honour in fighting against
France, and who from their point of view did
indeed obey them, since the feudal law bound the
vassal to the lord and not to the soil, so that
I04 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
where the sovereign was there was the true
fatherland ?
Numerous are the words whose meaning has
thus profoundly changed from age to age — ^words
which we can only arrive at understanding in the
sense in which they were formerly understood after
a long effort It has been said with truth that
much study is necessary merely to arrive at con-
ceiving what was signified to our great grand-
fathers by such words as the "king" and the
"royal family." What, then, is likely to be the
case with terms still more complex?
Words, then, have only mobile and transitory
significations which change from age to age and
people to people ; and when we desire to exert an
influence by their means on the crowd what it
is requisite to know is the meaning given them
j by the crowd at a given moment, and not the
; meaning which they formerly had or may yet
^ have for individuals of a different mental constitu-
tion.
Thus, when crowds have come, as the result of
political upheavals or changes of belief, to acquire
a profound antipathy for the images evoked by
certain words, the first duty of the true statesman
is to change the words without, of course, laying
hands on the things themselves, the latter being
too intimately bound up with the inherited con-
stitution to be transformed. The judicious Toe-
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. 105
queville long ago made the remark that the work
of the consulate and the empire consisted more
particularly in the clothing with new words of the
greater part of the institutions of the past — ^that
is to say, in replacing words evoking disagreeable
images in the imagination of the crowd by other
words of which the novelty prevented such evoca-
tions. The " taille " or tallage has become the
land tax ; the " gabelle," the tax on salt ; the
**aids," the indirect contributions and the con-
solidated duties ; the tax on trade companies and
guilds, the license, &c.
One of the most essential functions of states-
men consists, then, in baptizing with popular or,
at any rate, indifferent words things the crowd
cannot endure under their old names. The power
of words is so great that it suffices to designate
in well-chosen terms the most odious things to
make them acceptable to crowds. Taine justly
observes that it was by invoking liberty and
fraternity — words very popular at the time —
that the Jacobins were able " to install a despotism
worthy of Dahomey, a tribunal similar to that of
the Inquisition, and to accomplish human heca-
tombs akin to those of ancient Mexico." The
art of those who govern, as is the case with the
art of advocates, consists above all in the science of
employing words. One of the greatest difficulties
of this art is, that in one and the same society the
io6 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
same words most often have very different mean-
ings for the different social classes, who employ in
appearance the same words, but never speak the
same language.
In the preceding examples it is especially time
that has been made to intervene as the principal
factor in the changing of the meaning of words.
If, however, we also make race intervene, we shall
then see that, at the same period, among peoples
equally civilised but of different race, the same
words very often correspond to extremely dis-
similar ideas. It is impossible to understand
these differences without having travelled much,
aricl for this reason I shall not insist upon them.
I shall confine myself to observing that it is pre-
cisely the words most often employed by the
masses which among different peoples possess
the most different meanings. Such is the case,
for instance, with the words "democracy" and
** socialism" in such frequent use nowadays.
In reality they correspond to quite contrary
ideas and images in the Latin and Anglo-Saxon
mind. For the Latin peoples the word "de-
mocracy " signifies more especially the subordina-
tion of the will and the initiative of the individual
to the will and the initiative of the community
represented by the State. It is the State that is
charged, to a greater and greater degree, with
the direction of everything, the centralisation, the
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. 107
monopolisation, and the manufacture of every-
thing. To the State it is that all parties without
exception, radicals, socialists, or monarchists, con-
stantly appeal. Among the Anglo-Saxons and
notably in America this same word " democracy "
signifies, on the contrary, the intense development
of the will of the individual, and as complete a
subordination as possible of the State, which,
with the exception of the police, the army, and
diplomatic relations, is not allowed the direction
of anything, not even of public instruction. It
is seen, then, that the same word which signifies
for one people the subordination of the will and
the initiative of the individual and the pre-
ponderance of the State, signifies for another the
excessive development of the will and the initiative
of the individual and the complete subordination of
the State,'
§ 2. Illusions.
From the dawn of civilisation onwards crowds
have always undergone the influence of illusions.
It is to the creators of illusions that they have
raised more temples, statues, and altars than to
* In my book, " The Psychological Laws of the Evolution
of Peoples," I have insisted at length on the differences
which distinguish the Latin democratic ideal from the
Anglo-Saxon democratic ideal. Independently, and as the
result of his travels, M. Paul Bourget has arrived, in his
quite recent book, "Outre-Mer," at conclusions almost
identical with mine.
io8 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
any other class of men. Whether it be the re-
ligious illusions of the past or the philosophic
and social illusions of the present, these formid-
able sovereign powers are always found at the
head of all the civilisations that have successively
flourished on our planet. It is in their name that
were built the temples of Chaldea and Egypt and
the religious edifices of the Middle Ages, and that
a vast upheaval shook the whole of Europe a
century ago, and there is not one of our political,
artistic, or social conceptions that is free from their
powerful impress. Occasionally, at the cost of
terrible disturbances, man overthrows them, but he
seems condemned l^oJalwaysl set them up again.
Without them he would never have emerged from
his primitive barbarian state, and without them
again he would soon return to it. Doubtless they
are futile shadows ; but these children of our
dreams have forced the nations to create what-
ever the arts may boast of splendour or civilisation
of greatness.
" If one destroyed in museums and libraries, if
one hurled down on the flagstones before the
churches all the works and all the monuments
of art that religions have inspired, what would re-
main of the great dreams of humanity ? To give
to men that portion of hope and illusion without
which they cannot live, such is the reason for the
existence of gods, heroes, and poets. During fifty
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS 109
years science appeared to undertake this task.
But science has been compromised in hearts
hungering after the ideal, because it does not
dare to be lavish enough of promises, because it
cannot lie." '
The philosophers of the last century devoted
themselves with fervour to the destruction of the
religious, political, and social illusions on which
our forefathers had lived for a long tale of
centuries. By destroying them they have dried
up the springs of hope and resignation. Behind
the immolated chimeras they came face to face
with the blind and silent forces of nature, which
are inexorable to weakness and ignore pity.
Notwithstanding all its progress, philosophy has
been unable as yet to offer the masses any ideal
that can charm them ; but, as they must have their
illusions at all cost, they turn instinctively, as the
insect seeks the light, to the rhetoricians who
accord them what they want Not truth, but
error has always been the chief factor in the evo-
lution of nations, and the reason why socialism
is so powerful to-day is that it constitutes the last
illusion that is still vital. In spite of all scientific
demonstrations it continues on the increase. Its
principal strength lies in the fact that it is cham-
pioned by minds sufficiently ignorant of things
as they are in reality to venture boldly to promise
' Daniel Lesueur.
no THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
mankind happiness. The social illusion reigns
to-day upon all the heaped-up ruins of the past,
and to it belongs the future. The masses have
never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from
evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to
deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can
supply them with illusions is easily their master ;
whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is
always their victim.
§ 3. Experience.
Experience constitutes almost the only effective
process by which a truth may be solidly estab-
lished in the mind of the masses, and illusions
grown too dangerous be destroyed. To this end,
however, it is necessary that the experience should
take place on a very large scale, and be very fre-
quently repeated. The experiences undergone by
one generation are useless, as a rule, for the
generation that follows, which is the reason why
historical facts, cited with a view to demonstra-
tion, serve no purpose. Their only utility is to
prove to what an extent experiences need to be
repeated from age to age to exert any influence,
or to be successful in merely shaking an erroneous
opinion when it is solidly implanted in the mind
of the masses.
Our century and that which preceded it will
doubtless be alluded to by historians as an era
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS, m
of curious experiments, which in no other age
have been tried in such number.
The most gigantic of these experiments was
the French Revolution. To find out that a
society is not to be refashioned from top to
bottom in accordance with the dictates of pure
reason, it was necessary that several millions of
men should be massacred and that Europe should
be profoundly disturbed for a period of twenty
years. To prove to us experimentally that dic-
tators cost, the nations, who acclaim them, dear,
two ruinous experiences have been required in
fifty years, and in spite of their clearness they
do not seem to have been sufficiently convincing.
The first, nevertheless, cost three millions of men
and an invasion, the second involved a loss of
territory, and carried in its wake the necessity
for permanent armies. A third was almost at-
tempted not long since, and will assuredly be
attempted one day. To bring an entire nation
to admit that the huge German army was not^
as was currently alleged thirty years ago, a sort
of harmless national guard,' the terrible war
* The opinion of the crowd was formed in this case by
those rough-and-ready associations of dissimilar things, the
mechanism of which I have previously explained. The
French national guard of that period, being composed of
peaceable shopkeepers, utterly lacking in discipline and
quite incapable of being taken seriously, whatever bore a
similar name, evoked the same conception and was con-
sidered in consequence as harmless. The error of the
112 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
which cost us so dear had to take place. To
bring about the recognition that Protection ruins
the nations who adopt it, at least twenty years
of disastrous experience will be needful. These
examples might be indefinitely multiplied.
§ 4. Reason.
In enumerating the factors capable of making
an impression on the minds of crowds all mention
of reason might be dispensed with, were it not
necessary to point out the negative value of its
influence.
We have already shown that crowds are not to
be influenced by reasoning, and can only com-
prehend rough-and-ready associations of ideas.
The orators who know how to make an impression
upon them always appeal in consequence to their
sentiments and never to their reason. The laws
crowd was shared at the time by its leaders, as happens
so often in connection with opinions dealing with generalisa-
tions. In a speech made in the Chamber on the 31st of
December, 1867, and quoted in a book by M. E. Ollivier
that has appeared recently, a statesman who often followed
the opinion of the crowd but was never in advance of it —
I allude to M. Thiers— declared that Prussia only 4>ossessed
a national guard analogous to that of France, and in conse-
quence without importance, in addition to a regular army
about equal to the French regular army ; assertions about
as accurate as the predictions of the same statesman as to
the insignificant future reserved for railways.
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS, 113
of logic have no action on crowds.^ To bring
home conviction to crowds it is necessary first of
all to^thorou ghlyl comprehend^ the sentiments by
which they are animated, to pretend to share these
sentiments, then to endeavour to modify them by
calling up, by means of rudimentary associations,
certain eminently suggestive notions, to be capable,
if need be, of going back to the point of view
from which a start was made, and, above all, to
* My first observations with regard to the art of impress-
ing crowds and touching the slight assistance to be derived
in this connection from the rules of logic date back to the
seige of Paris, to the day when I saw conducted to the
Louvre, where the Government was then sitting, Marshal
V , whom a furious crowd asserted they had surprised
in the act of taking the plans of the fortifications to sell
them to the Prussians. A member of the Government
(G. P ), a very celebrated orator, came out to harangue
the crowd, which was demanding the immediate execution
of the prisoner. I had expected that the speaker would
point out the absurdity of the accusation by remarking that
the accused Marshal was positively one of those who had
constructed the fortifications, the plan of which, more-
over, was on sale at every booksellers. To my immense
stupefaction — I was very young then — the speech was on
quite different lines. ''Justice shall be done,'' exclaimed
the orator, advancing towards the prisoner, " and pitiless
justice. Let the Government of the National Defence con-
clude your inquiry. In the meantime we will keep the
prisoner in custody." At once calmed by this apparent
concession, the crowd broke up, and a quarter of an hour
later the Marshal was able to return home. He would
infallibly have been torn in pieces had the speaker treated
the infuriated crowd to the logical arguments that my
extreme youth induced me to consider as very convincing
9
114 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS,
divine from instant to instant the sentiments to
which one's discourse is giving birth. This neces-
sity of ceaselessly varying one's language in
accordance with the effect produced at the moment
of speaking deprives from the outset a prepared
and studied harangue of all efficaciousness. In
such a speech the orator follows his own line of
thought, not that of his hearers, and from this fact
alone his influence is annihilated.
Logical minds, accustomed to be convinced by
a chain of somewhat close reasoning, cannot avoid
having recourse to this mode of persuasion when
addressing crowds, and the inability of their argu-
ments always surprises them. " The usual mathe-
matical consequences based on the syllogism —
that is, on associations of identities — are impera-
tive . . ." writes a logician. " This imperativeness
would enforce the assent even of an inorganic
mass were it capable of following associations of
identities." This is doubtless true, but a crowd
is no more capable than an inorganic mass of
following such associations, nor even of under-
standing them. If the attempt be made to con-
vince by reasoning primitive minds — savages or
children, for instance — the slight value possessed
by this method of arguing will be understood.
It is not even necessary to descend so low as
primitive beings to obtain an insight into the utter
powerlessness of reasoning when it has to fight
FACTORS OF THE OPINIONS OF CROWDS. 115
against sentiment. Let us merely call to mind
how tenacious, for centuries long, have been
religious superstitions in contradiction with the
simplest logic. For nearly two thousand years
the most luminous geniuses have bowed before
their laws, and modern times have to be reached
for their veracity to be merely contested. The
Middle Ages and the Renaissance possessed many
enlightened men, but not a single man who
attained by reasoning to an appreciation of the
childish side of his superstitions, or who promul-
gated even a slight doubt as to the misdeeds of
the devil or the necessity of burning sorcerers.
Should it be regretted that crowds are never
guided by reason ? We would not venture to
affirm it. Without a doubt human reason would
not have availed to spur humanity along the path
of civilisation with the ardour and hardihood its
illusions have done. These illusions, the offspring
of those unconscious forces by which we are led^*
were doubtless necessary. Every race carries in
its mental constitution the laws of its destiny, and
it is, perhaps, these laws that it obeys with a
resistless impulse, even in the case of those of
its impulses which apparently are the most
unreasoned. It seeras at times as if nations were
submitted to secret forces analogous to those
which compel the acorn to transform itself into an
oak or a comet to follow its orbk.
ii6 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
What little insight we can get into these forces
must be sought for in the general course of the
evolution of a people, and not in the isolated facts
from which this evolution appears at times to
proceed. Were these facts alone to be taken into
consideration, history would seem to be the result
of a series of improbable chances. It was im-
probable that a Galilean carpenter should be-
come for two thousand years an all-powerful
God in whose name the most important civilisa-
tions were founded ; improbable, too, that a few
bands of Arabs, emerging from their deserts,
should conquer the greater part of the old Graeco-
Roman world, and establish an empire greater
than that of Alexander; improbable, again, that
in Europe, at an advanced period of its develop-
ment, and when authority throughout it had been
systematically hierarchised, an obscure lieutenant
of artillery should have succeeded in* reigning over
a multitude of peoples and kings.
Let us leave reason, then, to philosophers, and
not insist too strongly on its intervention in the
\joverning of men. It is not by reason, but most
often in spite of it, that are created those senti-
J ments that are the mainsprings of all civilisation
^ — sentiments such as honour, s elf-sa crifice. cgHgious
faith, patriotism, and the love_2£,glory.
CHAPTER III.
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS AND THEIR MEANS OF
PERSUASION.
§1. The leaders of crowds. The instinctive need of ail
beings forming a crowd to obey a leader — The psycho-
logy of the leaders of crowds — ^They alone can endow
crowds with faith and organise them — ^The leaders
forcibly despotic — Classification of the leaders — ^The
part played by the will. § 2. The means of action of the
leaders. Affirmation, repetition, contagion — ^The re-
spective part of these different factors — ^The way in
which contagion may spread from the lower to the
upper classes in a society — ^A popular opinion soon
becomes a general opinion. § 3. Prestige. Definition
of prestige and classification of its different kinds —
Acquired prestige and personal prestige — Various
examples — ^The way in which prestige is destroyed.
We are now acquainted with the mental constitu-
tion of crowds, and we also know what are the
motives capable of making an impression on their
mind. It remains to investigate how these motives
may be set in action, and by whom they may use-
fully be turned to practical 'account
ii8 THE OPISIOWS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
§ I. The Leaders of Crowds.
As soon as a certain number of living beings
are gathered together, whether they be animals
or men, they place themselves instinctively under
the authority of a chief
In the case of human crowds the chief is often
nothing more than a ringleader or agitator, but as
such he plays a considerable part. His will is the
nucleus around which the opinions of the crowd
are grouped and attain to identity. He consti-
tutes the first element towards the oi^nisation
of heterogeneous crowds, and paves the way for
their organisation in sects ; in the meantime he
directs them. A crowd is a servile flock that is
incapable of ever doing without a master.
The leader has most often started as one of the
led. He has himself been hypnotised by the idea,
whose apostle he has since become. It has taken
possession of him to such a degree that every-
thing outside it vanishes, and that every contrary
opinion appears to him an error or a superstition.
An example in point is Robespierre, hypnotised
by the philosophical ideas of Rousseau, and
employing the methods of the Inquisition to
propagate them.
The leaders we speak of are more frequently
men of action than thinkers. They are not gifted
with keen foresight, nor could they be, as this
quality generally conduces to doubt and inactivity.
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS, 119
They are especially recruited from the ranks of
those morbidly nervous, excitable, half-deranged
persons who are bordering on madness. However
absurd may be the idea they uphold or the goal
they pursue, their convictions are so strong that
all reasoning is lost upon them. Contempt and
persecution do not affect them, or only serve
to excite them the more. They sacrifice their
personal interest, their family — everything. The
very instinct of self-preservation is entirely oblite-
rated in them, and so much so that often the only
recompense they solicit is that of martyrdom.
The intensity of their faith gives great power of
suggestion to their words. The multitude is
always ready to listen to the strong-willed man,
who knows how to impose himself upon it. Men
gathered in a crowd lose all force of will, and
turn instinctively to the person who possesses the
quality they lack.
Nations have never lacked leaders, but all of the
latter have by no means been animated by those
strong convictions proper to apostles. These
leaders are often subtle rhetoricians, seeking only
their own personal interest, and endeavouring to
persuade by flattering base instincts. The influence
they can assert in this manner may be very great,
but it is always ephemeral. The men of ardent
convictions who have stirred the soul of crowds,
the Peter the Hermits, the Luthers, the Savona-
I20 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
rolas, the men of the French Revolution, have
only exercised their fascination after having been
themselves fascinated first of all by a creed.
They are then able to call up in the souls of their
fellows that formidable force known as faith, which
renders a man the absolute slave of his dream.
The arousing of faith — whether religious,
political, or social, whether faith in a work, in
a person, or an idea — ^has always been the function
of the great leaders of crowds, and it is on this
account that their influence is always very great.
Of all the forces at the disposal of humanity, faith
has always been one of the most tremendous, and
the ybspel rightly attributes to it the power of
moving mountains. To endow a man with faith
is to multiply his strength tenfold. The great
events of history have been brought about by
obscure believers, who have had little beyond their
faith in their favour. It is not by the aid of the
learned or of philosophers, and still less of sceptics,
that have been built up the great religions which
have swayed the world, or the vast empires which
Jiave spread from one hemisphere to the other.
In the cases just cited, however, we are dealing
with great leaders, and they are so few in number
that history can easily reckon them up. They
form the summit of a continuous series, which
extends from these powerful masters of men down
to the workman who, in the smoky atmosphere of
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 121
an inn, slowly fascinates his comrades by cease-
lessly drumming into their ears a few set phrases,
whose purport he scarcely comprehends, but the
application of which, according to him, must surely
bring about the realisation of all dreams and of
every hope.
In every social sphere, from the highest to the
lowest, as soon as a man ceases to be isolated he
speedily falls under the influence of a leader. The
majority of men, especially among the masses, do
not possess clear and reasoned ideas on any sub-
ject whatever outside their own speciality. The
leader serves them as guide. It is just possible
that he may be replaced, though very inefficiently,
by the periodical publications which manufacture
opinions for their readers and supply them with
ready-made phrases which dispense them of the
trouble of reasoning.
The leaders of crowds wield a very despotic
authority, and this despotism indeed is a condi-
tion of their obtaining a following. It has often
been remarked how easily they extort obedience,
although without any means of backing up their
authority, from the most turbulent section of the
working classes. They fix the hours of labour
and the rate of wages, and they decree strikes,
which are begun and ended at the hour they
ordain.
At the present day these leaders and agitators
« «
/
{
122 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
tend more and more to usurp the place of the
public authorities in proportion as the latter allow
themselves to be called in question and shorn of
their strength. The tyranny of these new masters
has for result that the crowds obey them much
more docilely than they have obeyed any govern-
ment If in consequence of some accident or
other the leaders should be removed from the
scene the crowd returns to its original state of a
collectivity without cohesion or force of resistance.
During the last strike of the Parisian omnibus
employes the arrest of the two leaders who were
directing it was at once sufficient to bring it to an
end. It is the need not of liberty but of servitude
Ithat is always predominant in the soul of crowds.
They are so bent on obedience that they instinc-
' tively submit to whoever declares himself their
master.
These ringleaders and agitators may be divided
into two clearly defined classes. The one includes
^ the men who are energetic-and-possess, but only
intexjnittently, muchsti^rgth of will, the other the
men, far rarer than the preceding, whose strength
\o{ will is enduring. The first mentioned are
Violent, brave, and audacious. They are more
especially useful to direct a violent enterprise
suddenly decided on, to carry the masses with
them in spite of danger, and to transform into
heroes the men who but yesterday were recruits.
\
(
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 123
Men of this kind were Ney and Murat under the
First Empire, and such a man in our own time
was Garibaldi, a talentless but energetic adventurer
who succeeded with a handful of men in laying
hands on the ancient kingdom of Naples, de-
fended though it was by a disciplined army.
Still, though the energy of leaders of this class is
a force to be reckoned with, it is transitory, and
scarcely outlasts the exciting cause that has
brought it into play. When they have returned
to their ordinary course of life the heroes ani-
mated by energy of this description often evince^
as was the case with those I have just cited, the
most astonishing weakness of character. They
seem incapable of reflection and of conducting
themselves under the simplest circumstances, al-
though they had been able to lead others. These
men are leaders who cannot exercise their function
except on the condition that they be led them-
selves and continually stimulated, that they have
always as their beacon a man or an idea, that they
follow a line of conduct clearly traced. The
second category of leaders, that of men of en*
during strength of will, have, in spite of a less
brilliant aspect, a much more considerable in-
fluence. In this category are to be found the
true founders of religions and great undertakings :
St. Paul, Mahomet, Christopher Columbus, and de
Lessepfi, for example. Whether they be intelligent
124 ^^£ OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
or narrow-minded is of no importance : the world
belongs to them. The persistent will-force they
possess is an immensely rare and immensely
powerful faculty to which everything yields.
What a strong and continuous will is capable of
is not always properly appreciated. Nothing
resists it ; neither nature, gods, nor man.
The most recent example of what can be effected
by a strong and continuous will is afforded us by
the illustrious man who separated the Eastern and
Western worlds, and accomplished a task that during
three thousand years had been attempted in vain
by the greatest sovereigns. He failed later in an
identical enterprise, but then had intervened old
age, to which everything, even the will, succumbs.
When it is desired to show what may be done
by mere strength of will, all that is necessary is to
relate in detail the history of the difficulties that
had to be surmounted in connection with the cut-
ting of the Suez Canal. An ocular witness. Dr.
Cazalis, has summed up in a few striking lines the
entire story of this great work, recounted by its
immortal autho?.
" From day to day, episode by episode, he told
the stupendous story of the canal. He told of all
he had had to vanquish, of the impossible he had
made possible, of all the opposition he encountered,
of the coalition against him, and the disappoint-
ments, the reverses, the defeats which had been un-
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS, 125
availing to discourage or depress him. He recalled
how England had combatted him, attacking him
without cessation, how Egypt and France had hesi-
tated, how the French Consul had been foremost in
his opposition to the early stages of the work, and
the nature of the opposition he had met with, the
attempt to force his workmen to desert from thirst
by refusing them fresh water ; how the Minister of
Marine and the engineers, all responsible men of
experienced and scientific training, had naturally
all been hostile, were all certain on scientific
grounds that disaster was at hand, had calculated
its coming, foretelling it for such a day and hour
as an eclipse is foretold."
The book which relates the lives of all these great
leaders would not contain many names, but these
names have been bound up with the most important
events in the history of civilisation.
§ 2. The Means of Action of the Leaders : cvV^'^^
Affirmation, Repetition, Contagion. >r>^"'
When it is wanted to stir up a crowd for a short
space of time, to induce it to comriiit an act of any
nature — to pillage a palace, or to die in defence of
a stronghold or a barricade, for instance — the crowd
must be acted upon by rapid suggestion, among
which example is the most powerful in its effects
To attain this end, however, it is necessary that the
crowd should have been previously prepared by
126 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
certain circumstances, and, above all, that he who
wishes to work upon it should possess the quality
to be studied farther on, to which I give the name
of prestige.
When, however, it is proposed to imbue the mind
of a crowd with ideas and beliefs — with modern social
theories, for instance — the leaders have recourse to
different expedients. The principal of them are
three in number and clearly defined — affirmation,
repetition, and contagion. Their action is some-
what slow, but its effects, once produced, are v^ry
lasting.
Affirmation pure and simple, kept free of all
reasoning and all proof, is one of the surest means
of making an idea enter the mind of crowds. The
conciser an affirmation is, the more destitute of
every appearance of proof and demonstration, the
more weight it carries. The religious books and
the legal codes of all ages have always resorted
to simple affirmation. Statesmen called upon to
defend a political cause, and commercial men
pushing the sale of their products by means of
advertising are acquainted with the value of
affirmation.
Affirmation, however, has no real influence un-
less it be constantly repeated, and so far as possible
in the same terms. It was Napoleon, I believe, who
said that there is only one figure in rhetoric of
serious importance, namely, repetition. The thing
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 127
affirmed comes by repetition to fix itself in the
mind in such a way that it is accepted in the end
as a demonstrated truth.
The influence of repetition on crowds is com-
prehensible when the power is seen which it exer-
cises on the most enlightened minds. This power
is due to the fact that the repeated statement is
embedded in the long run in those profound
regions of our unconscious selves in which the
motives of our actions are .forged. At the end of
a certain time we have forgotten who is the author
of the repeated assertion, and we finish by be-
lieving it. To this circumstance is due the astonish-
ing power of advertisements. When we have read
a hundred, a thousand, times that X*s chocolate is
the best, we imagine we have heard it said in many
quarters, and we end by acquiring the certitude that
such is the fact When we have read a thousand
times that Y*s flour has cured the most illustrious
persons of the most obstinate maladies, we are
tempted at last to try it when suffering from an
illness of a similar kind. If we always read in
the same papiers that A is an arrant scamp and B
a most honest man we finish by being convinced
that this is the truth, unless, indeed, we are given
to reading another paper of the contrary opinion,
in which the two qualifications are reversed. Affir-
mation and repetition are alone powerful enough to
combat each other.
1
■*./
128 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
When an affirmation has been sufficiently re-
peated and there is unanimity in this repetition —
as has occurred in the case of certain famous
financial undertakings rich enough to purchase
every assistance — ^what is called a current of
opinion is formed and the powerful mechanism
of contagion intervenes. Ideas, ^ntiments, emo-
\ tions, and beliefs possess in crowds a contagious
' power as intense as that of microbes. This phe-
nomenon is very natural, since it is observed even
in animals when they are together in number.
Should a horse in a stable take to biting his
manger the other horses in the stable will imitate
him. A panic that has- seized on a few sheep will
soon extend to the whole flock. In the case of
men collected in a crowd all emotions are very
rapidly contagious, which explains the suddenness
of panics. Brain disorders, likg_madnggs^^re
^^ themselves contagious. The frequency of mad-
ness among doctors who are specialists for the
mad is notorious. Indeed, forms of madness
have recently been cited — agoraphobia, for instance
— which are communicable from men to animals.
For individuals to succumb to contagion their
simultaneous presence on the same spot is not in-
dispensable. The action of contagion may be felt
from a distance under the influence of events which
give all minds an individual trend and the cha-
racteristics peculiar to crowds. This is especially
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 129
the case when men's minds have been prepared to
undergo the influence in question by those remote
factors of which I have made a study above. An
example in point is the revolutionary movement of
1 848, which, after breaking out in Paris, spread
rapidly over a great part of Europe and shook a
number of thrones.
Imitation, to which so much influence is attri-\ ^
buted in social phenomena, is in reality a mere \
effect of contagion. Having shown its influence
elsewhere, I shall confine myself to reproducing
what I said on the subject fifteen years ago. My
remarks have since been developed by other writers
in recent publications.
" Man, like animals, has a natural tendency to imi-
tation. Imitation is a necessity for him, provided
always that the imitation is quite easy. It is this
necessity that makes the influence of what is called
fashion so powerful. Whether in the matter of
opinions, ideas, literary manifestations, or merely 01
dress, how many persons are bold enough to run
counter to the fashion ? It is by examples not by \ ^
arguments that crowds are guided. At every
period there exists a small number of indi-
vidualities which react upon the remainder and are
imitated by the unconscious mass. It is needful
however, that these individualities should not be in
too pronounced disagreement with received ideas
Were they so, to imitate them would be too diff.-
10
\
130 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
cult and their influence would be nil. For this very
! reason men who are too superior to their epoch are
\ generally without influence upon it The line of
separation is too strongly marked. For the same
reason too Europeans, in spite of all the advan-
tages of their civilisation, have so insignificant an
influence on Eastern people ; they differ from them
to too great an extent.
" The dual action of the past and of reci-
procal imitation renders, in the long run, all the
men of the same country and the same period so
alike that even in the case of individuals who
would seem destined to escape this double in-
fluence, such as philosophers, learned men, and
men of letters, thought and style have a family
air which enables the age to which they belong to
be immediately recognised. It is not necessary
to talk for long with an individual to attain to a
thorough knowledge of what he reads, of his
habitual occupations, and of the surroundings
amid which he lives." '
Contagion is so powerful that it forces upon
individuals not only certain opinions, but certain
modes of feeling as well. Contagion is the cause
of the contempt in which, at a given period, certain
works are held — the example of "Tannhauser " may
be cited — which, a few years later, for the same
* Gustave le Bon, " L' Homme et les Societes," vol. iL
p. 116. 1881.
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 131
reason are admired by those who were foremost
in criticising them.
The opinions and beliefs of crowds are specially 1^
propagated by contagion, but never by reasoning^
The conceptions at present rife among the working
classes have been acquired at the public-house as
the result of affirmation, repetition, and contagion,
and indeed the mode of creation of the beliefs of
crowds of every age has scarcely been different.
Renan justly institutes a comparison between the
first founders of Christianity and "the socialist
working men spreading their ideas from public-
house to public-house" ; while Voltaire had already
observed in connection with the Christian religion
that " for more than a hundred years it was only
embraced by the vilest riff-raff."
It will be noted that in cases analogous to
those I have just cited, contagion, after having
been at work among the popular classes, has spread
to the higher classes of society. This is what we
see happening at the present day with regard to
the socialist doctrines which are beginning to be
held by those who will yet be their first victims.
Contagion is so powerful a force that even the \ y
sentiment of personal interest disappears under its
action.
This is the explanation of the fact that every
opinion adopted by the populace always ends in
implanting itself with great vigour in the highest
132 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
social strata, however obvious be the absurdity of
the triumphant opinion. This reaction of the lower
upon the higher social classes is the more curious,
owing to the circumstance that the beliefs of the
crowd always have their origin to a greater or less
extent in some higher idea, which has often re-
mained without influence in the sphere in which it
was evolved. Leaders and agitators, subjugated
by this higher idea, take hold of it, distort it and
create a sect which distorts it afresh, and then
propagates it amongst the masses, who carry the
process of deformation still further. Become a
popular truth the idea returns, as it were, to its
source and exerts an influence on the upper classes
of a nation. In the long run it is intelligence that
shapes the destiny of the world, but very indirectly.
The philosophers who evolve ideas have long since
returned to dust, when, as the result of the process
I have just described, the fruit of their reflection
ends by triumphing.
§ 3. Prestige.
Great power is given to ideas propagated by
affirmation, repetition, and contagion by the cir-
cumstance that they acquire in time that mys-
terious force known as prestige.
Whatever has been a ruling power in the world,
whether it be ideas or men, has in the main en-
forced its authority by means of that irresistible
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS, • 133
force expressed by the word " prestige." The term
is one whose meaning is grasped by everybody,
but the word is employed in ways too different for
it to be easy to define it. Prestige may involve
such sentiments as admiration or fear. Occa-
sionally even these sentiments are its basis, but it
can perfectly well exist without them. The greatest
measure of prestige is possessed by the dead, by
beings, that is, of whom we do not stand in fear —
by Alexander, Caesar, Mahomet, and Buddha, for
example. On the other hand, there are fictive
beings whom we do not admire — the monstrous
divinities of the subterranean temples of India, for
instance— ^but who strike us nevertheless as en-
dowed with a great prestige.
Prestige in reality is a sort of domination exer-
cised on our mind by an individual, a work, or an
idea. This domination entirely paralyses our
critical faculty, and fills our soul with astonish-
ment and respect. The sentiment provoked is
inexplicable, like all sentiments, but it would
appear to be of the same kind as the fascination
to which a magnetised person is subjected. Pres- yV
tige is the mainspring* of all authority. Neither v y\. 1
gods, kings, nor wom^ n have ever reigned without (\^
it.
The various kinds of prestige may be grouped
under two principal heads : acquired prestige and
personal prestige. Acquired prestige is that re-
\
134 ^^^ OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
suiting from name, fortune, and reputation. It
may be independent of personal prestige. Per-
sonal prestige, on the contrary, is something essen-
tially peculiar to the individual ; it may coexist
with reputation, glory, and fortune, or be strength-
ened by them, but it is perfectly capable of existing
in their absence.
Acquired or artificial prestige is much the most
common. The mere fact that an individual occu-
pies a certain position, possesses a certain fortune,
or bears certain titles, endows him with prestige,
however slight his own personal worth. A soldier
in uniform, a judge in his robes, always enjoys
prestige. Pascal has very properly noted the
necessity for judges of robes and wigs. Without
them they would be stripped of half their authority.
The most unbending socialist is always somewhat
impressed by the sight of a prince or a marquis ;
and the assumption of such titles makes the rob-
bing of tradesmen an easy matter.^
' The influence of titles, decorations, and uniforms on
crowds is to be traced in all countries, even in those in which
the sentiment of personal independence is the most strongly
developed. I quote in this connection a curious passage
from a recent book of travel, on the prestige enjoyed in
England by great persons.
** I had observed, under various circumstances, theipeculiar
sort of intoxication produced in the most reasonable English-
men by the contact or sight of an Engfish peer.
'' Provided his fortune enables him to keep up his rank,
he is sure of their affection in advance, and brought into
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 135
The prestige of which I have just spoken is
exercised by persons ; side by side with it may be
placed that exercised by opinions, literary and
artistic works, &c. Prestige of the latter kind is
most often merely the result of accumulated repeti-
tions. History, literary and artistic history especi-
ally, being nothing more than the repetition of
identical judgments, which nobody endeavours to
verify, every one ends by repeating what he learnt
at school, till there come to be names and things
which nobody would venture to meddle with. For
a modem reader the perusal of Homer results in-
contestably in immense boredom ; but who would
venture to say so ? The Parthenon, in its present
state, is a wretched ruin, utterly destitute of interest,
but it is endowed with such prestige that it does
not appear to us as it really is, but with all its
accompaniment of historic memories. The special
characteristic of prestige is to prevent Ksseeing
contact with him they are so enchanted as to put up with
anjrthing at his hands. They may be seen to redden with
pleasure at his approach, and if he speaks to them their
suppressed joy increases their redness, and causes their
eyes to gleam with unusual brilliance. Respect for nobility
is in their blood, so to speak, as with Spaniards the love of
dancing, with Germans that of music, and with Frenchmen
the liking for revolutions. Their passion for horses and
Sliakespeare is less violent, the satisfaction and pride they
derive from these sources a less integral part of their being.
There is a considerable sale for books dealing with the
peerage, and go where one will they are to be found, like
the Bible, in all hands.''
136 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
things as they are and to . entirely jparalyselour
judgment Crowds always, and individuals as a
rule, stand in need of ready-made opinions on all
subjects. The popularity of these opinions is
independent of the measure of truth or error
they contain, and is solely regulated by their
prestige.
I now come to personal prestige. Its nature is
very different from that of artificial or acquired
prestige, with which I have just been concerned.
It is a faculty independent of all titles, of all
authority, and possessed by a small number of
persons whom it enables to exercise a veritably
magnetic fascination on those around them,
although they are socially their equals, and lack
all ordinary means of domination. They force the
acceptance of their ideas and sentiments on those
about them, and they are obeyed as is the tamer
of wild beasts by the animal that could easily
devour him.
The great leaders of crowds, such as Buddha,
Jesus, Mahomet, Joan of Arc, and Napoleon, have
possessed this form of prestige in a high degree,
and to this endowment is more particularly due
the position they attained. Gods, heroes, and
dcjgmas win their way in the world of their own
inward strength. They are not to be discussed :
they disappear, indeed, as soon as discussed.
The great personages I have just cited were in
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 137
possession of their power of fascination long before
they became illustrious, and would never have
become so without it It is evident, for instance,
that Napoleon at the zenith of his glory enjoyed
an immense prestige by the mere fact of his power,
but he was already endowed in part with this
prestige when he was without power and com-
pletely unknown. When, an obscure general, he
was sent, thanks to influential protection, to com-
mand the army of Italy, he found himself among
rough generals who were of a mind to give a
hostile reception to the young intruder dispatched
them by the Directory. From the very begin-
ning, from the first interview, without the aid of
speeches, gestures, or threats, at the first sight of
the man who was to become great they were
vanquished. Taine furnishes a curious account of
this interview taken from contemporary memoirs.
" The generals of division, amongst others Auge-
reau, a sort of swashbuckler, uncouth and heroic,
proud of his height and his bravery, arrive at the
staff quarters very badly disposed towards the
little upstart dispatched them from Paris. On the
strength of the description of him that has been
given them, Augereau is inclined to be insolent
and insubordinate ; a favourite of Barras, a general
who owes his rank to the events of Vend^miaire
who has won his grade by street-fighting, who is
13S THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
looked upon as bearish, because he is always think-
ing in solitude, of poor aspect, and with the reputa-
tion of a mathematician and dreamer. They are
introduced, and Bonaparte keeps them waiting*
At last he appears, girt with his sword ; he puts on
his hat, explains the measures he has taken, gives
his orders, and dismisses them. Augereau has
remained silent ; it is only when he is outside that
he regains his self-possession and is able to deliver
himself of his customary oaths. He admits with
Mass^na that this little devil of a general has
inspired him with awe ; he cannot understand the
ascendency by which from the very first he has
felt himself overwhelmed."
Become a great man, his prestige increased in
proportion as his glory grew, and came to be at
least equal to that of a divinity in the eyes of those
devoted to him. General Vandamme, a rough,
typical soldier of the Revolution, even more brutal
and energetic than Augereau, said of him to Mar-
shal d'Arnano in 1815, as on one occasion they
mounted together the stairs of the Tuileries : " That
devil of a man exercises a fascination on me that
I cannot explain even to myself, and in such a
degree that, though I fear neither God nor devil,
when I am in his presence I am ready to tremble
like a child, and he could make me go through the
eye of a needle to throw myself into the fire."
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS, 139
Napoleon exercised a like fascination on all who
came into contact with him,^
Davoust used to say, talking of Maret's devo-
tion and of his own : " Had the Emperor said to
us, * It is important in the interest of my policy
that Paris should be destroyed without a single
person leaving it or escaping,' Maret I am sure
would have kept the secret, but he could not have
abstained from compromising himself by seeing
that his family got clear of the city. On the other
hand, I, for fear of letting the truth leak out, would
have let my wife and children stay,"
It is necessary to bear in mind the astounding
power exerted by fascination of this order to
' Thoroughly conscious of his prestige, Napoleon was
aware that he added to it by treating rather worse than
stable lads the great personages around him, and among
whom figured some of those celebrated men of the Ck)n-
vention of whom Europe had stood in dread. The gossip
of the period abounds in illustrations of this fact. One day,
in the midst of a Council of State, Napoleon grossly insults
Beugnot, treating him as one might an unmannerly valet.
The effect produced, he goes up to him and says, " Well,
stupid, have you found your head again ? " Whereupon
Beugnot, tall as a drum-major, bows very low, and the little
man raising his hand, takes the tall one by the ear, " an
intoxicating sign of favour," writes Beugnot, "the familiar
gesture of the master who waxes gracious." Such examples
give a clear idea of the degree of base platitude that
prestige can provoke. They enable us to understand the
immense contempt of the great despot for the men sur-
rounding him — ^men whom he merely looked upon as "food
for powder."
I40 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
understand that marvellous return from the Isle of
Elba, that lightning-like conquest of France by an
isolated man confronted by all the organised forces
of a great country that might have been supposed
weary of his tyranny. He had merely to cast a
look at the generals sent to lay hands on him» and
who had sworn to accomplish their mission. All
of them submitted without discussion. •
V
" Napoleon," writes the English General Wolse-
ley, " lands in France almost alone, a fugitive
from the small island of Elba which was his king-
dom, and succeeded in a few weeks, without blood-
shed, in upsetting all organised authority in France
under its legitimate king; is it possible for the
personal ascendency of a man to affirm itself in a
more astonishing manner ? But from the beginning
to the end of this campaign, which was his last,
how remarkable too is the ascendency he exercised
over the Allies, obliging them to follow his initia-
tive, and how near he came to crushing them I "
His prestige outlived him and continued to
grow. It is his prestige that made an emperor of
his obscure nephew. How powerful is his memory
still is seen in the resurrection of his legend in pro-
gress at the present day. Ill-treat men as you will,
massacre them by millions, be the cause of invasion
upon invasion, all is permitted you if you possess
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 141
prestige in a sufficient degree and the talent neces-
sary to uphold It
I have invoked, no doubt, in this case a quite
exceptional example of prestige, but one it was
useful to cite to make clear the genesis of great
religions, great doctrines, and great empires. Were
it not for the power exerted on the crowd by
prestige, such growths would be incomprehensible.
Prestige, however, is not based solely on per-
sonal ascendency, military glory, and religious
terror; it may have a more modest origin and
still be considerable. Our century furnishes
several examples. One of the most striking ones
that posterity will recall from age to age will be
supplied by the history of the illustrious man who
modified the face of the globe and the commercial
relations of the nations by separating two con-
tinents. He succeeded in his enterprise owing to
his iitimense strength of will, but also owing to the
fascination he exercised on those surrounding him.
To overcome the unanimous opposition he met
with, he had only to show himself. He would
speak briefly, and in face of the charm he
exerted his opponents became his friends. The
English in particular strenuously opposed his
scheme ; he had only to put in an appearance in
England to rally all suffi-ages. In later years,
when he passed Southampton, the bells were rung
on his passage ; and at the present day a move-
142 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
merit is on foot in England to raise a statue in his
honour.
" Having vanquished whatever there is to van-
quish, men and things, marshes, rocks, and sandy
wastes," he had ceased to believe in obstacles, and
wished to begin Suez over again at Panama. He
began again with the same methods as of old ; but
he had aged, and, besides, the faith that moves
mountains does not move them if they are too lofty.
The mountains resisted, and' the catastrophe that
ensued destroyed the glittering aureole of glory
that enveloped the hero. His life teaches how
prestige can grow and how it can vanish. After
rivalling in greatness the most famous heroes of
history, he was lowered by the magistrates of
his country to the ranks of the vilest criminals.
When he died his coffin, unattended, traversed an
indifferent crowd. Foreign sovereigns are alone in
rendering homage to his memory as to that of one
of the greatest men that history has known.'
' An Austrian paper, the Neue Freie Pressc, of Vienna, has
indulged on the subject of the destiny of de^^esseps in
reflections marked by a most judicious psychological insight.
I therefore reproduce them here : —
" After the condemnation of Ferdinand de yCbsseps one
has no longer the right to be astonished at tfe sad end of
Christopher Columbus. If Ferdinand de Lesseps were a
rogue every noble illusion is a crime. Antiquity would
have crowned thS memory of de Lesseps with an aureole of
glory, and would have made him drink from the bowl of nectar
in the midst of Olympus, for he has altered the face of the
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 143.
Still, the various examples that have just been
cited represent extreme cases. To fix in detail
the psychology of prestige, it would be necessary
to place them at the extremity of a series, which
would range from the founders of religions and
empires to the private individual who endea-
earth and accomplished works which make the creation
more perfect. The President of the Court of Appeal has
immortalised himself by condemning Ferdinand de Lesseps,
for the nations will always demand the name of the man
who was not afraid to debase his century by investing with
the convict's cap an aged man, whose life redounded to the
glory of his contemporaries.
" Let there be no more talk in the future of inflexible
justice, there where reigns a bureaucratic hatred of audacious
feats. The nations have need of audacious men who
believe in themselves and overcome every obstacle with-
out concern for their personal safety. Genius cannot be
prudent ; by dint of prudence it could never enlarge the
sphere of human activity.
"... Ferdinand de Lesseps has known the intoxication
of triumph and the bitterness of disappointment — Suez and
Panama. At this point the heart revolts at the morality of
success. When de Lesseps had succeeded in joining twa
seas princes and nations rendered him their homage ;
to-day, when he meets with failure among the rocks of the
Cordilleras, he is nothing but a vulgar rogue. ... In this
result we see a war between the classes of society, the dis-
content of bureaucrats and employes, who take their re-
venge with the aid of the criminal code on those who would
raise themselves above their fellows. . . . Modern legislators
are filled with embarrassment when confronted by the lofty
ideas due to human genius ; the public comprehends such
ideas still less, and it is easy for an advocate-general
to prove that Stanley is a murderer and de Lesseps a
deceiver."
144 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
vours to dazzle his neighbours by a new coat or
a decoration.
Between the extreme limits of this series would
find a place all the forms of prestige resulting from
the different elements composing a civilisatioii— •
sciences, arts, literature, &c. — and it would be seeni
that prestige constitutes the fundamental element!
of persuasion. Consciously or not, the being, the
idea, or the thing possessing prestige is imme-
diately imitated in consequence of contagion, and
forces an entire generation to adopt certain modes
of feeling and of giving expression to its thought
This imitation, moreover, is, as a rule, unconscious,
which accounts for the fact that it is perfect The
modern painters who copy the pale colouring and
the stiff attitudes of some of the Primitives are
scarcely alive to the source of their inspiration.
They believe in their own sincerity, whereas, if an
eminent master had not revived this form of art,
people would have continued blind to all but its
naKve and inferior sides. Those artists who, after
the manner of another illustrious master, inundate
their canvasses with violet shades do not see in
nature more violet than was detected there fifty
years ago ; but they are influenced, "suggestioned,"
by the personal and special impressions of a painter
who, in spite of this eccentricity, was successful in
acquiring great prestige. Similar examples might
be brought forward in connection with all the
elements of civilisation.
THE LEADERS OF CROWDS. 145
It is seen from what precedes that a number of
factors may be concerned in the genesis of prestige;
among them success was always one of the most
important. Every successful man, every idea that
forces itself into recognition, ceases, ipsofactOy to be
called in question. The proof that success is one
of the principal stepping-stones to prestige is that
the disappearance of the one is almost always fol-
lowed by the disappearance of the other. The
hero whom the crowd acclaimed yesterday is in-
sulted to-day should he have been overtaken by
failure. The re-action, indeed, will be the stronger
in proportion as the prestige has been great. The
crowd in this case considers the fallen hero as an
equal, and takes its revenge for having bowed to a
superiority whose existence it no longer admits.
While Robespierre was causing the execution of
his colleagues and of a great number of his con-
temporaries, he possessed an immense prestige.
When the transposition of a few votes deprived
him of power, he immediately lost his prestige, and
the crowd followed him to the guillotine with the
self-same imprecations with which shortly before
it had pursued his victims. Believers always break
the statues of their former gods with every symptom
of fury.
Prestige lost by want of success disappears in a
brief space of time. It can also be worn away,
but more slowly by being subjected to discussion.
II
146 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
7 This latter power, however, is exceedingly sure.
From the moment prestige is called in question it
ceases to be prestige. The gods and men who \
have kept their prestige for long have never
tolerated discussion. For the crowd to admire, it
must be kept at a distance.
\ ."r
^. I*'
y
CHAPTER IV.
LIMITATIONS OF THE VARIABILITY OF THE BELIEFS
AND OPINIONS OF CROWDS.
I. Fixed Beliefs, The invariability of certain general
beliefs — ^They shape the course of a civilisation — ^The
difficulty of uprooting them — In what respect intoler-
ance is a virtue in a people — ^The philosophic absurdity
of a belief cannot interfere with its spreading. § 2.
The Changeable Opinions of Crowds. The extreme mo-
bility of opinions which do not arise from general
beliefs — ^Apparent variations of ideas and beliefs in less
than a century — ^The real limits of these variations —
The matters effected by the variation — The disappear-
ance at present in progress of general beliefs, and the
extreme diffusion of the newspaper press, have for
result that opinions are nowadays more and more
changeable — ^Why the opinions of crowds tend on the
majority of subjects towards indifferences-Govern-
ments now powerless to direct opinion as they formerly
did — Opinions prevented to-day from being tyrannical
on account of their exceeding divergency.
§ I. Fixed Beliefs.
A CLOSE parallel exists between the anatomical
and psychological characteristics of living beings.
174
148 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
In these anatomical characteristics certain in-
variable, or slightly variable, elements are met
with, to change which the lapse is necessary of
geological ages. Side by side with these fixed,
indestructible features are to be found others ex-
tremely changeable, which the art of the breeder
or horticulturist may easily modify, and at times
to such an extent as to conceal the fundamental
characteristics from an observer at all inattentive
The same phenomenon is observed in the case
of moral characteristics. Alongside\the unalter-
able psychological elements of a race, mobile and
changeable elements are to be encountered. For
this reason, in studying the beliefs and opinions of
a people, the presence is always detected of a fixed
groundwork on which are engrafted opinions as
changing as the surface sand on a rock.
The opinions and beliefs of crowds may be
divided, then, into two very distinct classes. On
the one hand we have great permanent beliefs,
which endure for several centuries, and on which
an. entire civilisation may rest. Such, for instance,
in the past were feudalism, Christianity, and Pro-
testantism ; and such, in our own time, are the
nationalist principle and contemporary democratic
and social ideas. In the second place, there are
the transitory, changing opinions, the outcome, as
a rule, of general conceptions, of which every age
sees the birth and disappearance ; examples in
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 149
point are the theories which mould literature and
the arts — those, for instance, which produced
romanticism, naturalism, mysticism, &c. Opinions
of this order are as superficial, as a rule, as fashion,
and as changeable. They may be compared to
the ripples which ceaselessly arise and vanish on
the surface of a deep lake.
The great generalised beliefs are very restricted
in number. Their rise and fall form the culmina-
ting points of the history of every historic race.
They constitute the real framework of civilisa-
tion.
It is easy to imbue the mind of crowds with
a passing opinion, but very difficult to implant
therein a lasting belief However, a belief of this
latter description once established, it is equally
difficult to uproot it It is usually only to be
changed at the cost of violent revolutions. Even
revolutions can only avail when the belief has
almost entirely lost its sway over men's minds.
In that case revolutions serve j to/TmaTly? sweep
away what had already been aunost cast aside,
though the force of habit prevented its complete
abandonment The beginning of a revolution is |
in reality the end of a belief
The precise moment at which a great belief is
doomed is easily recognisable ; it is the moment
when its value begins to be called in question.
Every general belief being little else than a fiction.
ISO THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
it can only survive on the condition that it be not
subjected to examination.
But even when a belief is severely shaken, the
institutions to which it has given rise retain their
strength and disappear but slowly. Finally, when
the belief has completely lost its force, all that
rested upon it is soon involved in ruin. As yet a
nation has never been able to change its beliefs
without being condemned at the same time to
transform all the elements of its civilisation. The
nation continues this process of transformation
until it has alighted on and accepted a new general
belief : until this juncture it is perforce in a state
of anarchy. General beliefs are the indispensable
pillars of civilisations ; they determine the trend of
ideas. They alone are capable of inspiring faith
and creating a sense of duty.
Nations have always been conscious of the
utility of acquiring general beliefs, and have in-
stinctively understood that their disappearance
would be the signal for their own decline. In the
case of the Romans, the fanatical cult of Rome
was the belief that made them masters of the
world, and when the belief had died out Rome
was doomed to die. As for the barbarians who
destroyed the Roman civilisation, it was only
when they had acquired certain commonly ac-
cepted beliefs that they attained a measure of
cohesion and emerged from anarchy.
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 151
Plainly it is not for nothing that nations have
always displayed intolerance in the defence of
their opinions. This intolerance, open as it is to
criticism from the philosophic standpoint, repre-
sents in the life of a people the most necessary of
virtues. It was to found or uphold general beliefs
that so many victims were sent to the stake in the
Middle Ages and that so many inventors and
innovators have died in despair even if they have
escaped martyrdom. It is in defence, too, of such
beliefs that the world has been so often the scene
of the direst disorder, and that so many millions
of men have died on the battle-field, and will yet
die there.
There are great difficulties in the way of estab-
lishing a general belief, but when it is definitely
implanted its power is for a long time to come
invincible, and however false it be philosophically
it imposes itself upon the most luminous intelli-
gence. Have not the European peoples regarded
as incontrovertible for more than fifteen centuries
religious legends which, closely examined, are as
barbarous ^ as those of Moloch ? The frightful
absurdity of the legend of a God who revenges
himself for the disobedience of one of his
' Barbarous, philosophically speaking, I mean. In
practice they have created an entirely new civilisation,
and for fifteen centuries have given mankind a glimpse of
those enchanted realms of generous dreams and of hope
which he will know no more.
152 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
creatures by inflicting horrible tortures on his son
remained unperceived during many centuries.
Such potent geniuses as a Galileo, a Newton, and
a Leibnitz never supposed for an instant that the
truth of such dogmas could be called in question.
Nothing can be more typical than this fact of the
hypnotising effect of general beliefs, but at the
same time nothing can mark more decisively the
humiliating limitations of our intelligence.
As soon as a new dogma is implanted in the
mind of crowds it becomes the source of inspira-
tion whence are evolved its institutions, arts,
and mode of existence. The sway it exerts over
men's minds under these circumstances is absolute.
Men of action have no thought beyond realising
the accepted belief, legislators beyond applying
it, while philosophers, artists, and men of letters
are solely preoccupied with its expression under
various shapes.
From the fundamental belief transient accessory
ideas may arise, but they always bear the impress
of the belief from which they have sprung. The
Egyptian civilisation, the European civilisation of
the Middle Ages, the Mussulman civilisation of the
Arabs are all the outcome of a small number of
religious beliefs which have left their mark on the
least important elements of these civilisations and
allow of their immediate recognition.
Thus it is that, thanks to general beliefs, the men
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 153
of every age are enveloped in a network of tradi-
tions, opinions, and customs which render them
all alike, and from whose yoke they cannot extricate
themselves. Men are guided in their conduct
above all by their beliefs and by the customs that
are the consequence of those beliefs. These
beliefs and customs regulate the smallest acts of
our existence, and the most independent spirit
cannot escape their influence. The tyranny
exercised unconsciously on men's minds is the
only real tyranny, because it cannot be fought
against Tiberius, Ghengis Khan, and Napoleon
were assuredly redoubtable tyrants, but from the
depth of their graves Moses, Buddha, Jesus, and
Mahomet have exerted on the human soul a far
profounder despotism. A conspiracy may over-
throw a tyrant, but what can it avail against a
firmly established belief? In its violent struggle
with Roman Catholicism it is the French Revolu-
tion that has been vanquished, and this in spite of
the fact that the sympathy of the crowd was
apparently on its side, and in spite of recourse to
destructive measures as pitiless as those of the
Inquisition. The only real tyrants that humanity
has known have always been the memories of its
dead or the illusions it has forged itself.
The philosophic absurdity that often marks
general beliefs has never been an obstacle to their
triumph. Indeed the triumph of such beliefs
154 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
would seem impossible unless on the condition
that they offer some mysterious absurdity. In
consequence, the evident weakness of the socialist
beliefs of to-day will not prevent them triumphing
among the masses. Their real inferiority to all
religious beliefs is solely the result of this con-
sideration, that the ideal of happiness offered
by the latter being realisable only in a future life,
it was beyond the power of anybody to contest it.
The socialist ideal of happiness being intended to
be realised on earth, the vanity of its promises
will at once appear as soon as the first efforts
towards their realisation are made, and simul-
taneously the new belief will entirely lose its
prestige. Its strength, in consequence, will only
increase until the day when, having triumphed,
its practical realisation shall commence. For this
reason, while the new religion exerts to begin
with, like all those that have preceded it, a de-
structive influence, it will be unable, in the future,
to play a creative part.
§ 2. The Changeable Opinions of Crowds.
Above the substratum of fixed beliefs, whose
power we have just demonstrated, is found an
overlying growth of opinions, ideas, and thoughts
which are incessantly springing up and dying out.
Some of them exist but for a day, and the more
important scarcely outlive a generation. We have
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 155
already noted that the changes which supervene
in opinions of this order are at times far more
superficial than real, and that they are always
afifected by racial considerations. When examin-
ing, for instance, the political institutions of France
we showed that parties to all appearance utterly
distinct;;p^oyalists, radicals, imperialists, social-
ists, &c. — have an ideal absolutely identical, and
that this ideal is solely dependent on the mental
structure of the French race, since a quite contrary
ideal is found under analogous names among
other races. Neither the name given to opinions
nor deceptive adaptations alter the essence of
things. The men of the Great Revolution, satu-
rated with Latin literature, who (their eyes fixed
on the Roman Republic), adopted its laws, its
fasces, and its togas, did not become Romans
because they were under the empire of a powerful
historical suggestion. The task of the philosopher
is to investigate what it is which subsists of ancient
beliefs beneath their apparent changes, and to
identify amid the moving flux of opinions the part
determined by general beliefs and the genius of
the race.
In the absence of this philosophic test it might
be supposed that crowds change their political
or religious beliefs frequently and at will. All
history, whether political, religious, artistic, or
literary, seems to prove that such is the case.
156 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
As an example, let us take a very short period
of French history, merely that from 1790 to 1820,
a period of thirty years' duration, that of a genera-
tion. In the course of it we see the crowd at
first monarchical become very revolutionary, then
very imperialist, and again very monarchical. In
the matter of religion it gravitates in the same
lapse of time from Catholicism to atheism, then
towards deism, and then returns to the most
pronounced forms of Catholicism. These changes
take place not only amongst the masses, but also
amongst those who direct them. We observe with
astonishment the prominent men of the Conven-
tion, the sworn enemies of kings, men who would
have neither gods nor masters, become the humble
servants of Napoleon, and afterwards, under Louis
XVI 1 1., piously carry candles in religious proces-
sions.
Numerous, too, are the changes in the opinions
of the crowd in the course of the following seventy
years. The " Perfidious Albion " of the opening
of the century is the ally of France under
Napoleon's heir ; Russia, twice invaded by France,
which looked on with satisfaction at French
reverses, becomes its friend.
In literature, art, and philosophy the successive
evolutions of opinion are more rapid still.
Romanticism, naturalism, mysticism, &c., spring
up and die out in turn. The artist and the writer
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 157
applauded yesterday are treated on the morrow
with profound contempt
When, however, we analyse all these changes in
appearance so far reaching, what do we find ? All
those that are in opposition with the general
beliefs and sentiments of the race are of transient
duration, and the diverted stream soon resumes its
course. The opinions which are not linked to any
general belief or sentiment of the race, and which
in consequence cannot possess stability, are at the
mercy of every chance, or, if the expression be
preferred, of every change in the surrounding cir-
cumstances. Formed by suggestion and contagion,,
they are always momentary; they crop up and
disappear as rapidly on occasion as the sandhills
formed by the wind on the sea-coast.
At the present day the changeable opinions of
crowds are greater in number than they ever were,
and for three different reasons.
The first is that as the old beliefs are losing
their influence to a greater and greater extent,
they are ceasing to shape the ephemeral opinions
of the moment as they did in the past The
weakening of general beliefs clears the ground
for a crop of haphazard opinions without a past
or a future.
The second reason is that the power of crowds
being on the increase, and this power being less
and less counterbalanced, the extreme mobility of
158 THE OPINIONS AND BEUEFS OF CROWDS.
ideas, which we have seen to be a peculiarity of
crowds, can manifest itself without let or hind-
rance.
Finally, the third reason is the recent develop-
ment of the newspaper press, by whose agency
the most contrary opinions are being continually
brought before the attention of crowds. The
suggestions that might result from each individual
opinion are soon destroyed by suggestions of an
opposite character. The consequence is that no
opinion succeeds in becoming widespread, and
that the existence of all of them is ephemeral
An opinion nowadays dies out before it has found
a sufficiently wide acceptance to become general.
A phenomenon quite new in the world's history,
and most characteristic of the present age, has
resulted from these different causes ; I allude to
the powerlessness of governments to direct opinion.
In the past, and in no very distant past, the
action of governments and the influence of a few
writers and a very small number of newspapers
-constituted the real reflectors of public opinion.
To-day the writers have lost all influence, and the
newspapers only reflect opinion. As for statesmen,
far from directing opinion, their only endeavour is
to follow it. They have a dread of opinion, which
amounts at times to terror, and causes them to
adopt an utterly unstable line of conduct
The opinion of crowds tends, then, more and
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 159
more to become the supreme guiding principle in
politics. It goes so far to-day as to force on
alliances, as has been seen recently in the case of
the Franco-Russian alliance, which is solely the
outcome of a popular movement A curious
symptom of the present time is to observe popes,
kings, and emperors consent to be interviewed as
a means of submitting their views on a given
subject to the judgment of crowds. Formerly it
might have been correct to say that politics were
not a matter of sentiment. Can the same be said
to-day, when politics are more and more swayed
by the impulse of changeable crowds, who are un-
influenced by reason and can only be guided by
sentiment ?
As to the press, which formerly directed opinion,
it has had, like governments, to Jhimble itself
before the power of crowds. It wields, no doubt,
a considerable influence, but only because it is
exclusively the reflection of the opinions of
crowds and of their incessant variations. Become
a mere agency for the supply of information,
the press has renounced all endeavour to enforce
an idea or a doctrine. It follows all the changes
of public thought, obliged to do so^by the neces-
sities of competition under pain of losing its
readers. The old staid and influential organs of
the past, such as the Constitutionnely the Dibats^
or the Siicky which were accepted as oracles by
i6o THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
the preceding generation, have disappeared or have
become typical modem papers, in which a maxi*
mum of news is sandwiched in between light
articles, society gossip, and financial puffs. There
can be no question to-day of a paper rich enough
to allow its contributors to air their personal
opinions, and such opinions would be of slight
weight with readers who only ask to be kept
informed or to be amused, and who suspect every
affirmation of being prompted by motives of
speculation. Even the critics have ceased to be
able to assure the success of a book or a play.
They are capable of doing harm, but not of doing a
service. The papers are so conscious of the use*
lessness of everything in the shape of criticism
or personal opinion, that they have reached the
point of suppressing literary criticism, confining
themselves to citing the title of a book, and ap-
pending a " puff" of two or three lines.' In twenty
years' time the same fate will probably have over-
taken theatrical criticism.
The close watching of the course of opinion has
become to-day the principal preoccupation of the
press and of governments. The effect produced
by an event, a legislative proposal, a speech, is
without intermission what they require to know,
and the task is not easy, for nothing is more mobile
' These remarks refer to the French newspaper press. —
Note of the Translator.
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. i6i
and changeable than the thought of crowds, and
nothing more frequent than to see them execrate
to-day what they applauded yesterday. z'^^'""
This total absence of any sort of direction of
opinion, and at the same time the destruction of
general beliefs, have had for final result an extreme
divergency of convictions of every order, and a
growing indifference on the part of crowds to
everything that does not plainly touch their im-
mediate interests. Questions of doctrine, such as
socialism, only recruit champions boasting genuine
convictions among the quite illiterate classes,
among the workers in mines and factories, for
instance. Members of the lower middle class, and
working men possessing some degree of instruction,
have either become utterly sceptical or extremely
unstable in their opinions.
The evolution which has been effected in this
direction in the last twenty-five years is striking.
During the preceding period, comparatively near us
though it is, opinions still had a certain general
trend ; they had their origin in the acceptance of
some fundamental belief. By the mere fact that an
individual was a monarchist he possessed inevit-
ably certain clearly defined ideas in history as
well as in science, while by the mere fact that
he was a republican, his ideas were quite contrary.
A monarchist was well aware that men are not
descended from monkeys, and a republican was
12
x62 THE OPINIONS AND BELIEFS OF CROWDS.
not less well aware that such is in truth their
descent. It was the duty of the monarchist to
speak with horror, and of the republican to speak
with veneration, of the great Revolution. There
were certain names, such as those of Robespierre
and Marat, that had to be uttered with an air of
religious devotion, and other names, such as those
of Caesar, Augustus, or Napoleon, that ought
never to be mentioned unaccompanied by a
torrent of invective. Even in the French Sor-
bonne this ingenuous fashion of conceiving history
was general.^
At the present day, as the result of discussion
and analysis^ all opinions are losing their prestige ;
their distinctive features are rapidly worn away,
and few survive capable of arousing our enthusiasm.
The man of modem times is more and more a
prey to indifference.
■ There are pages in the books of the French official
professors of history that are very curious from this point
of view. They prove too how little the critical spirit is
developed by the system of university education in vogue
in France. I cite as an example the following extracts
from the " French Revolution "of M. Rambaud, professor
of history at the Sorbonne :
" The taking of the Bastille was a culminating event in
the historj^ not only of France, but of all Europe ; and
inaugurated a new epoch in the history of the world ! "
With respect to Robespierre, we learn with stupefaction
that "his dictatorship was based more especially on
opinion, persuasion, and moral authority ; it was a sort
of pontificate in the hands of a virtuous man ! " (pp. 91
and 220.)
LIMITATIONS OF VARIABILITY. 163
The general wearing away of opinions should
not be too greatly deplored. That it is a symptom
of decadence in the life of a people cannot be
contested. It is certain that men of immense, of
almost supernatural insight, that apostles, leaders
of crowds — men, in a word, of genuine and strong
convictions — exert a far greater force than men who
deny, who criticise, or who are indifferent, but it
must not be forgotten that, given the power pos-
sessed at present by crowds, were a single opinion
to acquire sufficient prestige to enforce its general
acceptance, it would soon be endowed with so
tyrannical a strength that everything would have
to bend before it, and the era of free discussion
would be closed for a long time. Crowds are oc-
casionally easy-going masters, as were Heliogabalus
and Tiberius, but they are also violently capricious.
A civilisation, when the moment has come for
crowds to acquire a high hand over it, is at the
mercy of too many chances to endure for long.
Could anything postpone for a while the hour of
its ruin, it would be precisely the extreme in-
stability of the opinions of crowds and their
growing indifference with respect to all general
beliefs.
BOOK III.
THE CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF
THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS,
CHAPTER 1.
THE CLASSIFICATION OF CROWDS.
The general divisions of crowds — ^Their classification.
§ I. Heterogeneous crowds. Different varieties of them
— The influence of race — ^The spirit of the crowd is
weak in proportion as the spirit of the race is strong —
The spirit of the race represents the civilised state and
the spirit of the crowd the barbarian state. § 2. Homo-
geneous crowds. Their different varieties — Sects, castes,
and classes.
We have sketched in this work the general
characteristics common to psychological crowds.
It remains to point out the particular character-
istics which accompany those of a general order
in the dififei*ent categories of collectivities, when
they are transformed into a crowd under the
influences of the proper exciting causes.
164
THE CLASSIFICATION OF CROWDS, 165
We will, first of all, set forth in a few words a
classification of crowds.
Our starting-point will be the simple multitude.
Its most inferior form is met with when the
multitude is composed of individuals belonging
to different races. In this case its only common
bond of union is the will, more or less respected^
of a chief. The barbarians of very diverse origin
who during several centuries invaded the Roman
Empire, may be eked as a specimen of multitudes
of this kind.
On a higher level than these multitudes com-
posed of different races are those which under
certain influences have acquired common character-
istics, and have ended by forming a single race.
They present at times characteristics peculiar to
crowds, but these characteristics are overruled to
a greater or less extent by racial considerations.
These two kinds of multitudes may, under
certain influences investigated in this work, be
transformed into organised or psychological crowds.
We shall break up these organised crowds into
the following divisions: —
A. Heterogeneous
crowds.
1. Anonymous crowds (street
crowds, for example).
2. Crowds not anonymous
(juries, parliamentary
assemblies, &c.).
B. Homogeneous
crowds.
i66 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
1. Sects (political sects, re-
ligious sects, &c.).
2. Castes (the military caste,
the priestly caste, the
working caste, &c.).
3. Classes (the middle classes,
the peasant classes, &c.).
We will point out briefly the distinguishing
characteristics of these different categories of
crowds.
§ I. Heterogeneous Crowds.
It is these collectivities whose characteristics
have been studied in this volume. They are
composed of individuals of any description, of
any profession, and any degree of intelligence.
We are now aware that by the mere fact that
men form part of a crowd engaged in action, their
collective psychology differs essentially from theif
individual psychology, and their intelligence is
affected by this differentiation. We have seen
that intelligence is without influence in collec-
tivities, they being solely under the sway of
unconscious sentiments.
A fundamental factor, that of race, allows of
a tolerably thorough differentiation of the various
heterogeneous crowds.
We have often referred already to the part
played by race, and have ^own it to be the
THE CLASSIFICATION OF CROWDS. 167
most powerful of the factors capable of deter-
mining men's actions. Its action is also to be
traced in the character of crowds. A crowd
composed of individuals assembled at haphazard,
but all of them Englishmen or Chinamen, will
differ widely from another crowd also composed
of individuals of any and every description, but
of other races — Russians, Frenchmen, or Spaniards,
for example.
The wide divergencies which their inherited
mental constitution creates in men's modes of
feeling and thinking at once come into promi-
nence when, which rarely happens, circumstances
gather together in the same crowd and in fairly
equal proportions individuals of different nation-
ality, and this occurs, however identical in ap-
pearance be the interests which provoked the
' gathering. The efforts made by the socialists to
assemble in great congresses the representatives
of the working-class populations of different
countries, have always ended in the most pro-
nounced discord. A Latin crowd, however revo-
lutionary or however conservative it be supposed,
will invariably appeal to the intervention of the
State to realise its demands. It is always dis-
tinguished by a marked tendency towards centra-
lisation and by a leaning, more or less pronounced,
in favour of a dictatorship. An English or an
American crowd, oa the contrary, sets no store
i68 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
on the State, and only appeals to private initiative.
A French crowd lays particular weight on equality
and an English crowd on liberty. These differ-
ences of race explain how it is that there are
almost as many different forms of socialism and
democracy as there are nations.
The genius of the race, then, exerts a parambunt
influence upon the dispositions of a crowd. It
is the powerful underlying force that limits its
changes of humour. It should be considered as
an essential law that tAe inferior characteristics
of crowds are the less accentuated in proportion as
the spirit of the race is strong. The crowd state
and the domination of crowds is equivalent to
the barbarian state, or to a return to it It is by
the acquisition of a solidly constituted collective
spirit that the race frees itself to a greater and
greater extent from the unreflecting power of
crowds, and emerges from the barbarian state.
The only important classification to be made of
heterogeneous crowds, apart from that based on
racial considerations, is to separate them into
anonymous crowds, such as street crowds, and
crowds not anonymous — deliberative assemblies
and juries, for example. The sentiment of re-
sponsibility absent from crowds of the first
description and developed in those of the second
often gives a very different tendency to their
respective acts.
the classification of crowds. 169
§ 2. Homogeneous Crowds.
Homogeneous crowds include : i. Sects ; 2.
Castes ; 3. Classes.
The sec^ represents the first step in the process
of organisation of homogeneous crowds. A sect
includes individuals differing greatly as to their
education, their professions, and the class of society
to which they belong, and with their common
beliefs as the connecting link. Examples in point
are religious and political sects.
The casU represents the highest degree of
organisation of which the crowd is susceptible.
While the sect includes individuals of very
different professions, degrees of education and
social surrounding, who are only linked together
by the beliefs they hold in common, the caste is ^
composed of individuals of the same profession,
and in consequence similarly educated and of
much the same social status. Examples in point
are the military and priestly castes.
The c/ass is formed of individuals of diverse
origin, linked together not by a community of
beliefs, as are the members of a sect, or by
common professional occupations, as are the
members of a caste, but by certain interests and
certain habits of life and education almost
identical. The middle class and the agricultural
class are examples.
Being only concerned in this work with
170 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
heterogeneous crowds, and reserving the study
of homogeneous crowds (sects, castes, and classes)
for another volume, I shall not insist here pn the
characteristics of crowds of this latter kind. I
shall conclude this study of heterogeneous crowds
by the examination of a few typical and distinct
categories of crowds.
- 1
CHAPTER II.
CROWDS TERMED CRIMINAL CROWDS.
Crowds termed criminal crowds — A crowd may be legally
yet not psychologically criminalr—The absolute un-
consciousness of the acts of crowds — ^Various examples
— Psychology of the authors of the September
massacres — ^Their reasoning, their sensibility, their
ferocity, and their morality.
Owing to the fact that crowds, after a period of
excitement, enter upon a purely automatic and
unconscious state, in which they are guided by
suggestion, it seems difficult to qualify them in
any case as criminal. I only retain this erroneous
qualification because it has been definitely brought
into vogue by recent psychological investigations.
Certain acts of crowds are assuredly criminal, if
considered merely in themselves, but criminal in
that case in the same way as the act of a tiger
devouring a Hindoo, after allowing its young to
maul him for their amusement.
The usual motive of the crimes of crowds is a
171
172 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS,
powerful suggestion, and the individuals who take
part in such crimes are afterwards convinced that
they have acted in obedience to duty, which is far
from being the case with the ordinary criminal.
The history of the crimes committed by crowds
illustrates what precedes.
The murder of M. de Launay, the governor of
the Bastille, may be cited as a typical example.
After the taking of the fortress the governor,
surrounded by a very excited crowd, was dealt
blows from every direction. It was proposed to
hang him, to cut off his head, to tie him to a
horse's tail. While struggling, he accidently
kicked one of those present. Some one proposed,
and his suggestion was at once received with
acclamation by the crowd, that the individual who
had been kicked should cut the governor's throat.
" The individual in question, a cook out of work,
whose chief reason for being at the Bastille was
idle curiosity as to what was going on, esteems,
that since such is the general opinion, the action
is patriotic and even believes he deserves a medal
for having destroyed a monster. With a sword
that is lent him he strikes the bared neck, but
the weapon being somewhat blunt and not cutting,
he takes from his pocket a small black-handled
knife and (in his capacity of cook he would be
experienced in cutting up meat) successfully effects
the operation."
CROWDS TERMED CRIMINAL CROWDS. 173
The working of the process indicated above is
clearly seen in this example. We have obedience
to a suggestion, which is all the stronger because
of its collective origin, and the murderer's con-
viction that he has committed a very meritorious
act, a conviction the more natural seeing that he
enjoys the unanimous approval of his fellow-
citizens. An act of this kind may be considered \
crime legally but not psychologically. ^'
The general characteristics of criminal crowds
are precisely the same as those we have met with
in all crowds : openness to suggestion, credulity,
mobility, the exaggeration of the sentiments good
or bad, the manifestation of certain forms of
morality, &c.
We shall find all these characteristics present
in a crowd which has left behind it in French
history the most sinister memories — the crowd
which perpetrated the September massacres. In
point of fact it offers much similarity with the
crowd that committed the Saint Bartholomew
massacres. I borrow the details from the narra-
tion of M. Taine,, who took them from contempo-
rary sources.
It is not known exactly who gave the order or
made the suggestion to empty the prisons by
massacring the prisoners. Whether it was Danton,
as is probable, or another does not matter; the
one interesting fact for us is the powerful sugges-
174 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
tion received by the crowd charged with the
massacre.
The crowd of murderers numbered some three
hundred persons, and was a perfectly typical
heterogeneous crowd. With the exception of a
very small number of professional scoundrels, it
was composed in the main of shopkeepers and
artisans of every trade: bootmakers, locksmiths,
hairdressers, masons, clerks, messengers, &c.
Under the influence of the suggestion received
they are perfectly convinced, as was the cook
referred to above, that they are accomplishing a
patriotic duty. They fill a double office, being at
once judge and executioner, but they do not for
a moment regard themselves as criminals.
Deeply conscious of the importance of their
duty, they begin by forming a sort of tribunal, and
in connection with this act the ingenuousness of
crowds and their rudimentary conception of justice
are seen immediately. In consideration of the large
number of the accused, it is decided that, to begin
with, the nobles, priests, officers, and members of
the king's household — in a word, all the individuals
whose mere profession is proof of their guilt in
the eyes of a good patriot — shall be slaughtered in
a body, there being no need for a special decision
in their case. The remainder shall be judged on
their personal appearance and their reputation.
In this way the rudimentary conscience of the
CROWDS TERMED CRIMINAL CROWDS. ff^f
crowd is satisfied. It will now be able to proceed
legally with the massacre, and to give free scope
to those instincts of ferocity whose genesis I
have set forth elsewhere, they being instincts
which collectivities always have it in them to
develop to a high degree. These instincts, how-
ever — as is regularly the case in crowds — ^will not
prevent the manifestation of other and contrary
sentiments, such as a tenderheartedness often as
extreme as the ferocity.
"They have the expansive sympathy and
prompt sensibility of the Parisian working man.
At the Abbaye, one of the federates, learning
that the prisoners had been left without water for
twenty-six hours, was bent on putting the gaoler
to death, and would have done so but for the
prayers of the prisoners themselves. When a
prisoner is acquitted (by the improvised tribunal)
every one, guards and slaughterers included, em-
braces him with transports of joy and applauds
frantically," after which the wholesale massacre
is recommenced. During its progress a pleasant
gaiety never ceases to reign. There is dancing and
singing around the corpses, and benches are
arranged " for the ladies," delighted to witness
the killing of aristocrats. The exhibition con-
tinues, moreover, of a special description of justice.
A slaughterer at the Abbaye having complained
that the ladies placed at a little distance saw
176 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
badly, and that only a few of those present had
the pleasure of striking the aristocrats, the justice
of the observation is admitted, and it is decided
that the victims shall be made to pass slowly
between two rows of slaughterers, who shall be
under the obligation to strike with the back of
the sword only so as to prolong the agony. At
the prison de la Force the victims are stripped
stark naked and literally "carved" for half an
hour, after which, when every one has had a good
view, they are finished off by a blow that lays bare
their entrails.
The slaughterers, too, have their scruples and
exhibit that moral sense whose existence in crowds
we have already pointed out They refuse to
appropriate the money and jewels of the victims,
taking them to the table of the committees.
Those rudimentary forms of reasoning, charac-
teristic of the mind of crowds, are always to be
traced in all their acts. Thus, after the slaughter
of the 1,200 or 1,500 enemies of the nation, some
one makes the remark, and his suggestion is at
once adopted, that the other prisons, those con-
taining aged beggars, vagabonds, and young
prisoners, hold in reality useless mouths, of which
it would be well on that account to get rid.
Besides, among them there should certainly be
enemies of the people, a woman of the name of
Delarue, for instance, the widow of a poisoner :
CROWDS TERMED CRIMINAL CROWDS. 177
" She must be furious at being in prison ; if she
could she would set fire to Paris : she must have
said so, she has said so. Another good riddance."
The demonstration appears convincing, and the
prisoners are massacred without exception, in-
cluded in the number being some fifty children
of from twelve to seventeen years of age, who,
of course, might themselves have become enemies
of the nation, and of whom in consequence it was
clearly well to be rid.
At the end of a week's work, all these operations
being brought to an end, the slaughterers can
think of reposing themselves. Profoundly con-
vinced that they have deserved well of their
country, they went to the authorities and de-
manded a recompense. The most zealous went
so far as to claim a medal.
The history of the Commune of 1871 affords
several facts analogous to those which precede.
Given the growing influence of crowds and the
successive capitulations before them of those in
authority, we are destined to witness many others
of a like nature.
13
CHAPTER III.
CRIMINAL yURIES.
Criminal juries — General characteristics of juries — Statistics
show that their decisions are independent of their
composition — ^The manner in which an impression may
be made on juries — The style and influence of argu-
ment —The methods of persuasion of celebrated counsel
— ^The nature of those crimes for which juries are
respectively indulgent or severe — ^The utility of the
jury as an institution, and the danger that would result
from its place being taken by magistrates.
Being unable to study here ever>' category of
jury, I shall only examine the most important —
that of the juries of the Court of Assize. These
juries afford an excellent example of the hetero-
geneous crowd that is not anonymous. We shall
find them display suggestibility and but slight
capacity for reasoning, while they are open to the
influence of the leaders of crowds, and they are
guided in the main by unconscious sentiments.
In the course of this investigation we shall have
occasion to observe some interesting examples of
CRIMINAL yURIES, 179
the errors that may be made by persons not versed
in the psychology of crowds.
Juries, in the first place, furnish us a good
example of the slight importance of the mental
level of the different elements composing a crowd,
so far as the decisions it comes to are concerned.
We have seen that when a deliberative assembly
is called upon to give its opinion on a question oi
a character not entirely technical, intelligence
stands for nothing. For instance, a gathering of
scientific men or of artists, owing to the mere fact
that they form an assemblage, will not deliver
judgments on general subjects sensibly different
from those rendered by a gathering of masons or
grocers. At various periods, and in particular
previous to 1 848, the French administration insti-
tuted a careful choice among the persons sum-
moned to form a jury, picking the jurors from
among the enlightened classes ; choosing professors,
functionaries, men of letters, &c. At the present
day jurors are recruited for the most part from
among small tradesmen, petty capitalists, and
employes. Yet, to the great astonishment of
specialist writers, whatever the composition of the
jury has been, its decisions have been identical.
Even the magistrates, hostile as they are to the
institution of the jury, have had to recognise the
exactness of the assertion. M. B^rard des Glajeux,
a former President of the Court of Assizes, ex-
i8o DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
presses himself on the subject in his " Memoirs " in
the following terms : —
" The selection of jurymen is to-day in reality in
the hands of the municipal councillors, who put
people down on the list or eliminate them from it
in accordance with the political and electoral pre-
occupations inherent in their situation. . . . The
majority of the jurors chosen are persons engaged
in trade, but persons of less importance than
formerly, and employes belonging to certain
branches of the administration. . . . Both opinions
and professions counting for nothing once the roU
of judge assumed, many of the jurymen having the
ardour of neophytes, and men of the best inten-
tions being similarly disposed in humble situations,
the spirit of the jury has not changed : its verdicts
have remained the same^
Of the passage just cited the conclusions, which
are just, are to be borne in mind and not the ex-
planations, which are weak. Too much astonish-
ment should not be felt at this weakness, for, as a
rule, counsel equally with magistrates seem to be
ignorant of the psychology of crowds and, in
consequence, of juries. I find a proof of this state-
ment in a fact related by the author just quoted.
He remarks that Lachaud, one of the most illus-
trious barristers practising in the Court of Assize,
CRIMINAL JURIES, i8i
made systematic use of his right to object to a
juror in the case of all individuals of intelligence
on the list Yet experience — and experience alone
— has ended by acquainting us with the utter use-
lessness of these objections. This is proved by the
fact that at the present day public prosecutors and
barristers, at any rate those belonging to the
Parisian bar, have entirely renounced their right to
object to a juror ; still, as M. des Glajeux remarks,
the verdicts have not changed, "they are neither
better nor worse."
Like all crowds, juries are very strongly im-
pressed by sentimental considerations, and very
slightly by argument. "They cannot resist the
sight," writes a barrister, " of a mother giving its
child the breast, or of orphans." " It is sufficient
that a woman should be of agreeable appearance,"
says M. des Glajeux, " to win the benevolence of
the jury."
Without pity for crimes of which it appears
possibJe they might themselves be the victims —
such crimes, moreover, are the most dangerous
for society — juries, on the contrary, are very indul-
gent in ihe case of breaches of the law whose
motive is passion. They are rarely severe on
infanticide by girl-mothers, or hard on the young
woman who throws vitriol at the man who has
seduced aiid deserted her, for the reason that they
feel instinctively that society runs but slight danger
1 82 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
from such crimes,' and that in a country in which
the law does not protect deserted girls the crime
of the girl who avenges herself is rather useful
than harmful, inasmuch as it frightens future
seducers in advance.
Juries, like all crowds, are profoundly impressed
by prestige, and President des Glajeux very pro-
perly remarks that, very democratic as juries are
in their composition, they are very aristocratic in
their likes and dislikes: " Name, birth, great wealth,
celebrity, the assistance of an illustrious counsel,
everything in the nature of distinction or that
' It is to be remarked, in passing, that this division of
crimes into those dangerous and those not dangerous for
society, which is well and instinctively made by juries,
is far from being unjust. The object of criminal laws is
evidently to protect society against dangerous criminals and
not to avenge it. On the other hand, the French code, and
above all the minds of the French magistrates, are still
deeply imbued with the spirit of vengeance characteristic
of the old primitive law, and the term " vindicte " (prosecu-
tion, from the Latin vindicia, vengeance) is still in daily use.
A proof of this tendency on the part of the magistrates is
found in the refusal by many of them to apply Berenger's
law, which allows of a condemned person not undergoing
his sentence unless he repeats his crime. Yet no magistrate
can be ignorant, for the fact is proved by statistics, that the
appliciition of a punishment inflicted for the first time
infallibly leads to further crime on the part of the person
punished. When judges set free a sentenced person it
always seems to them that society has not been avenged.
Rather than not avenge it they prefer to create a
dangerous, confirmed criminal.
CRIMINAL J^URIES, 183
lends brilliancy to the accused, stands him in
extremely good stead."
The chief concern of a good counsel should be
to work upon the feelings of the jury, and, as with
all crowds, to argue but little, or only to employ
rudimentary modes of reasoning. An English
barrister, famous for his successes in the assize
courts, has well set forth the line of action to be
followed : —
" While pleading he would attentively observe
the jury. The most favourable opportunity has
been reached. By dint of insight and experience
the counsel reads the effect of each phrase on the
faces of the jurymen, and draws his conclusions in
consequence. His first step is to be sure which
members of the jury are already favourable to his
cause. It is short work to (definitelyj gain\ their
adhesion, and having done so he turns his atten-
tion to the members who seem, on the contrary, ill-
disposed, and endeavours to discover why they are
hostile to the accused. This is the delicate part of
his task, for there may be an infinity of reasons for
condemning a man, apart from the sentiment of
justice."
These few lines r/sum/ the entire mechanism of
the art of oratory, and we see why the speech
prepared in advance has so slight *an effect, it
i84 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
being necessary to be able to modify the terms
employed from moment to moment in accordance
with the impression produced.
The orator does not require to convert to his
views all the members of a jury, but only the
leading spirits among it: who will determine the
general opinion. As in all crowds, so in juries
there are a small number of individuals who serve
as guides to the rest " I have found by expe-
rience," says the counsel cited above, " that one or
two energetic men suffice to carry the rest of the
jury with them." It is those two or three whom it
is necessary to convince by skilful suggestions.
First of all, and above all, it is necessary to please
them. The man forming part of a crowd whom
one has succeeded in pleasing is on the point of
being convinced, and is quite disposed to accept
as excellent any arguments that may be offered
him. I detach the following anecdote from an
interesting account of M. Lachaud, alluded to
above : —
" It is well known that during all the speeches
he would deliver in the course of an assize sessions,
Lachaud never lost sight of the two or three jury-
men whom he knew or felt to be influential but
obstinate. As a rule he was successful in winning
over these refractory jurors. On one occasion,
however, in the provinces, he had to deal with a
CRIMINAL JURIES, 185
juryman whom he plied in vain for three-quarters
of an hour with his most cunning arguments ; the
man was the seventh juryman, the first on the
second bench. The case was desperate. Suddenly,
in the middle of a passionate [demonstration,
Lachaud stopped short, and addressing the Presi-
dent of the court said : * Would you give instruc-
tions for the curtain there in front to be drawn ?
The seventh juryman is blinded by the sun.' The
juryman in question reddened, smiled, and ex-
pressed his thanks. He was won over for the
defence."
Many writers, some of them most distinguished,
have started of late a strong campaign against the
institution of the jury, although it is the only pro-
tection we have against the errors, really very
frequent, of a caste that is under no control.' A
' The magistracy is, in point of fact, the only administra-
tion whose acts are under no control. In spite of all its
revolutions, democratic France does not possess that right
of habeas corpus of which England is so proud. We have
banished all the tyrants, but have set up a magistrate in
each city who disposes at will of the honour and liberty
of the citizens. An insignificant juge d'instruction (an
examining magistrate who has no exact counterpart in
England. — Trans.), fresh from the university, possesses the
revolting power of sending to prison at will persons of the
most considerable standing, on a simple supposition on his
part of their guilt, and without being obliged to justify his
act to any one. Under the pretext of pursuing his investi-
gation he can keep these persons in prison for six months
i86 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
portion of these writers advocate a jury recruited
solely from the ranks of the enlightened classes ;
but we have already proved that even in this case
the verdicts would be identical with those returned
under the present system. Other writers, taking
their stand on the errors committed by juries,
would abolish the jury and replace it by judges.
It is difficult to see how these would-be reformers
can forget that the errors for which the jury is
blamed were committed in the first instance by
judges, and that when the accused person comes
before a jury he has already been held to be guilty
by several magistrates, by the jug-e dinstruction^
the public prosecutor, and the Court of Arraign-
ment. It should thus b e clea r that were the
accused to be definitely^'udgeo] by magistrates
instead of by jurymen, he would lose his only
chance of being admitted innocent. The errors of
juries have always been first of all the errors of
magistrates. It is solely the magistrates, then,
who should be blamed when particularly monstrous
judicial errors crop up, such, for instance, as the
or even a year, and free them at last without owing them
either an indemnity or excuses. The warrant in France is
the exact equivalent of the leiire de cachet^ with this
dift'erence, that the latter, with the use of which the
monarchy was so justly reproached, could only be resorted
to by persons occupying a very high position, while the
warrant is an instrument in the hands of a whole class of
citizens which is far from passing for being very en-
lightened or very independent.
CRIMINAL JURIES. 187
quite recent condemnation of Dr. L who,
prosecuted by a juge d^instructiotiy of excessive
stupidity, on the strength of the denunciation of a
half-idiot girl, who accused the doctor of having
performed an illegal operation upon her for thirty
francs, would have been sent to penal servitude
but for an explosion of public indignation, which
had for result that he was immediately set at
liberty by the Chief of the State. The honourable
character given the condemned man by all his
fellow-citizens made the grossness of the blunder
self-evident. The magistrates themselves admitted
it, and yet out of caste considerations they did all
they could to prevent the pardon being signed*
In all similar affairs the jury, confronted with
technical details it is unable to understand,
naturally hearkens to the public prosecutor,
arguing that, after all, the affair has been investi-
gated by magistrates trained to unravel the most
intricate situations. Who, then, are the real
authors of the error — the jurymen or the magis-
trates ? We should cling vigorously to the jury.
It constitutes, perhaps, the only category of crowd
that cannot be replaced by any individuality. It
alone can temper the severity of the law, which>
equal for all, ought in principle to be blind and to
take no cognisance of particular cases. Inacces-
sible to pity, and heeding nothing but the text
of the law, the judge in his professional severity
1 88 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS,
would visit with the same penalty the burglar
guilty of murder and the wretched girl whom
poverty and her abandonment by her seducer have
driven to infanticide. The jury, on the other
hand, instinctively feels that the seduced g^rl is
much less guilty than the seducer, who, however, is
not touched by the law, and that she deserves
every indulgence.
Being well acquainted with the psychology of
castes, and also with the psychology of other cate-
gories of crowds, I do not perceive a single case in
which, wrongly accused of a crime, I should not
prefer to have to deal with a jury rather than with
magistrates. I should have some chance that my
innocence would be recognised by the former and
not the slightest chance that it would be admitted
by the latter. The power of crowds is to be
dreaded, but the power of certain castes is to be
dreaded yet more. Crowds are open to conviction ;
castes never are.
CHAPTER IV.
ELECTORAL CROWDS.
General characteristics of electoral crowds — ^The manner of
persuading them — ^Xhe-q»^itics that should be pos-
sessed by a candidate — Necessity of prestige — ^Why
working men and peasants so rarely choose candidates
from their own class — ^The influence of words and
formulas on the elector — ^The general aspect of election
oratory — How the opinions of the elector are formed —
The power of political committees — ^They represent
me most redoubtable form of tyranny — The committees
of the Revolution — Universal suffrage cannot be re-
placed in spite of its slight psychological value — ^Why
it is that the votes recorded would remain the same
even if the right of voting were restricted to a limited
class of citizens — Of what universal suffrage is the
expression in all countries.
Electoral crowds — ^that is to say, collectivities
invested with the power of electing the holders of
certain functions — constitute heterogeneous crowds,
but as their action is confined to a single clearly
determined matter, namely, to choosing between
different candidates, they present only a few of the
189
190 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
characteristics previously described. Of the charac-
teristics peculiar to crowds, they display in particular
but slight aptitude for reasoning, the absence of
the critical spirit, irritability, credulity, and sim-
plicity. In their decision, moreover, is to be
traced the influence of the leaders of crowds and
the part played by the factors we have enumerated :
affirmation, repetition, prestige, and contagfion.
Let us examine by what methods electoral
crowds are to be persuaded. It will be easy to
deduce their psychology from the methods that
are most successful
It is of primary importance that the candidate
should possess prestige. Personal prestige can
only be replaced by that resulting from wealth.
Talent and even genius are not elements of success
of serious importance.
Of capital importance, on the other hand, is the
necessity for the candidate of possessing prestige,
of being able, that is, to force himself upon the
electorate without discussion. The reason why
the electors, of whom a majority are working men
or peasants, so rarely choose a man from their own
ranks to represent them is that such a person
enjoys no prestige among them. When, by chance,
they do elect a man who is their equal, it is as a
rule for subsidiary reasons — for instance, to spite an
eminent man, or an influential employer of labour
on whom the elector is in daily dependence, and
ELECTORAL CROWDS, 191
whose master he has the illusion he becomes in
this way for a moment
The possession of prestige does not suffice, how-
ever, to assure the success of a candidate. The
elector stickles in particular for the flattery of his
greed and vanity. He must be overwhelmed with
the most extravagant blandishments, and there
must be no hesitation in making him the most
fantastic promises. If he is a working man it is
impossible to go too far in insulting and stigmati-
sing employers of labour. As for the rival candi-
date, an effort must be made to destroy his chance
by establishing by dint of affirmation, repetition,
and contagion that he is an arrant scoundrel, and
that it is a matter of common knowledge that he
has been guilty of several crimes. It is, of course,
useless to trouble about any semblance of proof.
Should the adversary be ill-acquainted with the
psychology of crowds he will try to justify himself
by arguments instead of confining himself to
replying to one set of affirmations by another;
and he will have no chance whatever of being
successful.
The candidate's written programme should not
be too categorical, since later on his adversaries
might bring it up against him ; in his verbal pro-
gramme, however, there cannot be too much
exaggeration. The most important reforms may
be fearlessly promised. At the moment they arc
192 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
made these exaggerations produce a great effect,
and they are not binding for the future, it being
a matter of constant observation that the elector
never troubles himself to know how far the candi-
date he has returned has followed out the electoral
programme he applauded, and in virtue of which
the election was supposed to have been secured.
In what precedes, all the factors of persuasion
which we have described are to be recognised. We
shall come across them again in the action exerted
by words and formulas, whose magical sway we
have already insisted upon. An orator who knows
how to make use of these means of persuasion can
do what he will with a crowd. Expressi<Sns such
as infamous capital, vile exploiters, the admirable
working man, the socialisation of wealth, &c.,
always produce the same effect, although already
somewhat worn by use. But the candidate who
hits on a new formula as devoid as possible of
precise meaning, and apt in consequence to
flatter the most varied aspirations, infallibly obtains
a success. The sanguinary Spanish revolution of
1873 was brought about by one of these magical
phrases of complex meaning on which everybody'
can put his own interpretation.-. A contemporary
writer has described the launching of this phrase
in terms that deserve to be quoted : —
" The radicals have made the discovery that a
* * *.
ELECTORAL CROWDS. 193
centralised republic is a monarchy in disguise, and
to humour them the Cortes had unanimously pro-
claimed a federal republic^ though none of the
voters could have explained what it was he had
just voted for. This formula, however, delighted
everybody ; the joy was intoxicating, delirious.
The reign of virtue and happiness had just been
inaugurated on earth. A republican whose oppo-
nent refused him the title of federalist considered
himself to be mortally insulted. People addressed
each other in the streets with the words : * Long
live the federal republic !' After which the praises
were sung of the mystic virtue of the absence of
discipline in the army, and of the autonomy of the
soldiers. What was understood by the 'federal
republic ? ' There were those who took it to mean
the emancipation of the provinces, institutions akin
to those of the United States and administrative
decentralisation ; others had in view the abolition
of all authority and the speedy commencement of
the great social liquidation. The socialists of
Barcelona and Andalusia stood out for the abso-
lute sovereignty of the communes ; they proposed
to endow Spain with ten thousand independent
municipalities, to legislate on their own account,
and their creation to be accompanied by the
suppression of the police and the army. In the
southern provinces the insurrection was soon seen
to spread from town to town and village to village.
14
194 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
Directly a village had made its pronunciamento its
first care was to destroy the telegraph wires and
the railway lines so as to cut off all communication
with its neighbours and Madrid. The sorriest
hamlet was determined to stand on its own bottom.
Federation had given place to cantonalism, marked
by massacres, incendiarism, and every description
of brutality, and bloody saturnalia were celebrated
throughout the length and breadth of the land."
With respect to the influence that may be
exerted by reasoning on the minds of electors, to
harbour the least doubt on this subject can only
be the result of never having read the reports of
an electioneering meeting. In such a- gathering
affirmations, invectives, and sometimes blows are
exchanged, but never arguments. Shoifld silence
be established for a moment it is^because some
one present, having the reputation of a "tough
customer," has announced that he is about to
heckle the candidate by putting him one of those
embarrassing questions which are aiways the joy of
the audience. The satisfaction, however, of the
opposition party is shortlived, for the voice of the
questioner is soon drowned in the uproar made by
his adversaries. The following reports of public
meetings, chosen from hundreds of similar examples,
and taken from the daily papers, may be considered
as typical : — t
ELECTORAL CROWDS, 195
" One of the organisers of the meeting having
asked the assembly to elect a president, the storm
bursts. The anarchists leap on to the platform to
take the committee table by storm. The socialists
make an energetic defence ; blows are exchanged,
and each party accuses the other of being spies in
the pay of the Government, &c. ... A citizen
leaves the hall with a black eye.
" The committee is at length installed as best it
may be in the midst of the tumult, and the right
to speak devolves upon * Comrade ' X.
" The orator starts a vigorous attack on the
socialists, who interrupt him with shouts of * Idiot,
scoundrel, blackguard ! ' &c., epithets to which Com-
rade X". replies by setting forth a theory accord-
ing to which the socialists are * idiots' or 'jokers.'"
" The Allemanist party had organised yesterday
evening, in the Hall of Commerce, in the Rue du
Faubourg-du-Temple, a great meeting, preliminary
to the workers' j^/^ of the ist of May. The watch-
word of the meeting was * Calm and Tranquillity ! '
"Comrade G alludes to the socialists as
* idiots ' and ' humbugs,'
" At these words there is an exchange of invec-
tives and orators and audience come to blows.
Chairs, tables, and benches are converted into
weapons," &c., &c.
It is not to be imagined for a moment that this
196 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
description of discussion is peculiar to a determined
class of electors and dependent on their social
position. In every anonymous assembly whatever,
though it be composed exclusively of highly
educated persons, discussion always assumes the
same shape. I have shown that when men are
collected in a crowd there is a tendency towards
their mental levelling at work, and proof of this is
to be found at every turn. Take, for example, the
following extract from a report of a meeting com-
posed exclusively of students, which I borrow from
the Temps of 13th of February, 1895 • —
" The tumult only increased as the evening went
on ; I do not believe that a single orator succeeded
in uttering two sentences without being interrupted.
At every instant there came shouts from this or
that direction or from every direction at once.
Applause was intermingled with hissing, violent
discussions were in progress between individual
members of the audience, sticks were brandished
threateningly, others beat a tattoo on the floor, and
the interrupters were greeted with yells of *Put
him out ! * or * Let him speak ! *
" M. C lavished such epithets as odious and
cowardly, monstrous, vile, venal and vindictive, on
the Association, which he declared he wanted to
destroy," &c., &c.
How, it may be asked, can an elector form an
ELECTORAL CROWDS. 197
•
opinion under such conditions? To put such a
question is to harbour a strange delusion as to the
measure of liberty that may be enjoyed by a
collectivity. Crowds have opinions that have been
imposed upon them, but they never boast reasoned
opinions. In the case under consideration the
opinions and votes of the electors are in the hands
of the election committees, whose leading spirits
are, as a rule, publicans, their influence over the
working men, to whom they allow credit, being
great. " Do you know what an election committee
is ? " writes M. Sch^rer, one of the most valiant
champions of present-day democracy. "It is
neither more nor less than the comer-stone of our
institutions, the masterpiece of the political
machine. France is governed to-day by the
election committees." ^
To exert an influence over them is not difficult,
provided the candidate be in himself acceptable
and possess adequate financial resources. Accord-
ing to the admissions of the donors, three millions
' Committees under whatever name, clubs, syndicates,
&c., constitute perhaps the most redoubtable danger result-
ing from the power of crowds. They represent in reality
the most impersonal and, in consequence, the most oppres-
sive form of tyranny. The leaders who direct the com-
mittees being supposed to speak and act in the name of a
collectivity, are freed from all responsibility, and are in a
position to do just as they choose. The most savage t3rrant
has never ventured even to dream of such- proscriptions
as those ordained by the committees of the Revolution.
198 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
of francs sufficed to secure the repeated elections
of General Boulanger.
Such is the psychology of electoral crowds. It
is identical with that of other crowds : neither
better nor worse.
In consequence I draw no conclusion against
universal suffrage from what precedes. Had I to
settle its fate, I should preserve it as it is for
practical reasons, which are to be deduced in point
of fact from our investigation of the psychology of
crowds. On this account I shall proceed to set
them forth.
No doubt the weak side of universal suffrage is
too obvious to be overlooked. It cannot be gain-
said that civilisation has been the work of a small
minority of superior intelligences constituting the
culminating point of a pyramid, whose stages,
widening in proportion to the decrease of mental
power, represent the masses of a nation. The
greatness of a civilisation cannot assuredly depend
upon the votes given by inferior elements
boasting solely numerical strength. Doubtless,
Barras has declared that they decimated the Convention,
picking off its members at their pleasure. So long as he was
able to speak in their name, Robespierre wielded absolute
power. The moment this frightful dictator separated him-
self from them, for reasons of personal pride, he was lost.
The reign of crowds is the reign of committees, that is, of
the leaders of crowds. A severer despotism cannot be
imagined.
ELECTORAL CROWDS. 199
too, the votes recorded by crowds are often very
dangerous. They have already cost us several
invasions, and in view of the triumph of socialism,
for which they are preparing the way, it is
probable that the vagaries of popular sovereigjnty
will cost us still more dearly.
Excellent, however, as these objections are in
theory, in practice they lose all force, as will be
admitted if the invincible strength be remembered
of ideas transformed into dogmas. The dogma of
the sovereigfnty of crowds is as little defensible,
from the philosophical point of view, as the
religious dogmas of the Middle Ages, but it
enjoys at present the same absolute power they
formerly enjoyed. It is as unattackable in conse-
quence as in the past were our religious ideas.
Imagine a modem freethinker miraculously trans-
ported into the midst of the Middle Ages. Do
you suppose that, after having ascertained the
sovereigfn power of the religious ideas that were
then in force, he would have been tempted to
attack them ? Having fallen into the hands of a
judge disposed to send him to the stake, under the
imputation of having concluded a pact with the
devil, or of having been present at the witches
sabbath, would it have occurred to him to call in
question the existence of the devil or of the
sabbath? It were as wise to oppose cyclones
with discussion as the beliefs of crowds. The
200 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
dogma of universal suffrage possesses to-day the
power the Christian dogmas formerly possessed.
Orators and writers allude to it with a respect
and adulation that never fell to the share of Louis
XIV. In consequence the same position must be
taken up with regard to it as with regard to all
religious dogmas. Time alone can act upon them.
Besides, it would be the more useless to attempt
to undermine this dogma, inasmuch as it has an
appearance of reasonableness in its favour. "In
an era of equality," Tocqueville justly remarks,
"men have no faith in each other on account of
their being all alike ; yet this same similitude
gives them an almost limitless confidence in the
judgment of the public, the reason being that it
does not appear probable that, all men being
equally enlightened, truth and numerical superiority
should not go hand in hand."
Must it be believed that with a restricted
suffrage — a suffrage restricted to those intel-
lectually capable if it be desired — an improvement
would be effected in the votes of crowds? I
cannot admit for a moment that this would be the
case, and that for the reasons I have already given
touching the mental inferiority of all collectivities,
whatever their composition. In a crowd men
always tend to the same level, and, on general
questions, a vote recorded by forty academicians is
no better than that of forty water-carriers. I do
ELECTORAL CROWDS. 201
not in the least believe that any of the votes for
which universal suffrage is blamed — the re-estab-
lishment of the Empire, for instance — would have
fallen out differently had the voters been ex-
clusively recruited among learned and liberally
educated men. It does not follow because an in-
dividual knows Greek or mathematics, is an archi-
tect, a veterinary surgeon, a doctor, or a barrister,
that he is endowed with a special intelligence of
social questions. All our political economists are
highly educated, being for the most part professors
or academicians, yet is there a single general
question — ^protection, bimetallism, &c. — on which
they have succeeded in agreeing ? The explana-
tion is that their science is only a very attenuated
form of our universal ignorance. With regard to
social problems, owing to the number of unknown
quantities they offer, men are substantially, equally
ignorant.
In consequence, were the electorate solely com-
posed of persons stuffed with sciences their votes
would be no better than those emitted at present.
They would be guided in the main by their senti-
ments and by party spirit We should be spared
none of the difficulties we now have to contend
with, and we should certainly be subjected to the
oppressive tyranny of castes.
Whether the suffrage of crowds be restricted or
general, whether it be exercised under a republic
202 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
or a monarchy, in France, in Belgium, in Greece, in
Portugal, or in Spain, it is everywhere identical;
and, when all is said and done, it is the expression
of the unconscious aspirations and needs of the
race. In each country the average opinions of
those elected represent the genius of the race, and
they will be found not to alter sensibly from one
generation to another.
It is seen, then, that we are confronted once more
by the fundamental notion of race, which we have
come across so often, and on this other notion,
which is the outcome of the first, that institutions
and governments play but a small part in the life
of a people. Peoples are guided in the main by
the genius of their race, that is, by that inherited
residue of qualities of which the genius is the sum
total. Race and the slavery of our daily necessities
are the mysterious master-causes that rule our
destiny.
CHAPTER V.
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES.
Parliamentary crowds present most of the characteristics
common to heterogeneous crowds that are not anony-
mous — ^The simplicity of their opinions — ^Their suggesti-
bility and its limits — ^Their indestructible, fixed opinions
and their changed opinions — ^The reason of the pre-
dominance of indecision — ^The rdle of the leaders — ^The
reason of their prestige — ^They are the true masters of
an assembly whose votes, on that account, are mere
those of a small minority — ^The absolute power they
exercise — ^The elements of their oratorical art — Phrases .
and images — ^The psychological necessity the leaders
are under of being in a general way of stubborn con-
victions and narrow-minded — It is impossible for a
speaker without prestige to obtain recognition for
his arguments — ^The exaggeration of the sentiments,
whether good or bad, of assemblies — ^At certain
moments they become automatic — ^The sittings of the
Convention — Cases in which an assembly loses the
characteristics of crowds — ^The influence of specialists
when technical questions arise — ^XbfiMaduajatages an^
dangers of a parliamentary system in all countries — It
is adapted to modern needs ; but it involves financial
waste and the progressive curtailment of all liberty —
Conclusion.
In parliamentary assemblies we have an example
of heterogeneous crowds that are not anonymous.
203
^
204 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
Although the mode of election of their members
varies from epoch to epoch, and from nation to
nation, they present very similar characteristics.
In this case the influence of the race makes itself
felt to weaken or exaggerate the characteristics
common to crowds, but not to prevent their mani-
festation. The parliamentary assemblies of the
most widely different countries, of Greece, Italy,
Portugal, Spain, France, and America present
great analogies in their debates and votes, and
leave the respective governments face to face with
identical difficulties.
Moreover, the parliamentary system represents
the ideal of all modern civilised peoples. The
system is the expression of the idea, psychologi-
cally erroneous, but generally admitted, ^that a/
large gathering of men is much more capable than
a small number 7)f coming to a wise and indepen-
dent decision on a given subject.
The general characteristics of crowds are to be
met with in parliamentary assemblies : intellectual
simplicity, irritability, suggestibility, the exaggera-
tion of the sentiments and the preponderating
influence of a few leaders. In consequence, how-
ever, of their special composition parliamentary
crowds offer some distinctive features, which we
shall point out shortly.
Simplicity in their opinions is one of their most
important characteristics. In the case of all
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 205
parties, and more especially so far as the Latin
peoples are concerned, an invariable tendency is
met with in crowds of this kind to solve the most
complicated social problems by the simplest
abstract principles and general laws applicable to
all cases. Naturally the principles vary with the
party ; but owing to the mere fact that the indi-
vidual members are a part of a crowd, they are
always inclined to exaggerate the worth of their
principles, and to push them to their extreme con-
sequences. In consequence parliaments are more
especially representative of extreme opinions.
The most perfect example of the ingenuous
simplification of opinions peculiar to assemblies is
offered by the Jacobins of the French Revolution.
Dogmatic and logical to a man, and their brains
full of vague generalities, they busied themselves
with the application of fixed principles without
concerning themselves with events. It has been
said of them, with reason, that they went through
the Revolution without witnessing it. With the
aid of the very simple dogmas that served them as
guide, they imagined they could recast society
from top to bottom, and cause a highly refined
civilisation to return to a very anterior phase of
the social evolution. The methods they resorted
to to realise their dream wore the same stamp of
absolute ingenuousness. They confined themselves,
in reality, to destroying what stood in their way.
2o6 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
AH of them, moreover — Girondists, the Men of the
Mountain, the Thermidorians, &c. — were alike
animated by the same spirit.
Parliamentary crowds are very open to sugges-
tion ; and, as in the case of all crowds, the sugges-
tion comes from leaders possessing prestige ; but
the suggestibility of parliamentary assemblies has
very clearly defined limits, which it is important to
point out.
On all questions of local or regional interest
every member of an assembly has fixed, unalterable
opinions, which no amount of argument can shake.
The talent of a Demosthenes would be powerless
to change the vote of a Deputy on such questions
as protection or the privilege of distilling alcohol,
questions in which the interests of influential
electors are involved. The suggestion emanating
from these electors and undergone before the time
to vote arrives, sufficiently outweighs suggestions
from any other source to annul them and to main-
tain an absolute fixity of opinion.^
On general questions — the overthrow of a
Cabinet, the imposition of a tax, &c. — there is no
^ The following reflection of an English parliamentarian
of long experience doubtless applies to these opiuions, fixed
beforehand, and rendered unalterable by electioneering
necessities : " During the fifty years that I have sat at
Westminster, I have listened to thousands of speeches ;
but few of them have changed my opinion, not one of
them has changed my vote." .
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 207
longer any fixity of opinion, and the suggestions
of leaders can exert an influence, though not in
quite the same way as in an ordinary crowd.
Every party has its leaders, who possess occa-
sionally an equal influence. The result is that the
Deputy finds himself placed between two contrary
suggestions, and is inevitably made to hesitate.
This explains how it is that he is often seen to
vote in contrary fashion in an interval of a quarter of
an hour or to add to a law an article which nullifies
it; for instance, to withdraw from employers of
labour the right of choosing and dismissing their
workmen, and then tolyeiy nearlyjannunthis mea-
sure by an amendment^ ^
It is for the same reason that every Chamber
that is returned has some very stable opinions, and
other opinions that are very shifting. On the
whole, the general questions being the more
numerous, indecision is predominant in the Cham-
ber — the indecision which results from the ever-
present fear of the elector, the suggestion received
from whom is always latent, and tends to counter-
balance the influence of the leaders.
Still, it is the leaders who are definitely the
masters in those numerous discussions, with regard
to the subject-matter of which the members of an
assembly are without strong preconceived opinions.
The necessity for these leaders is evident, since,
under the name of heads of groups, they are met
2o8 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
with in the assemblies of every country. They
are the real rulers of an assembly. Men forming
a crowd cannot do without a master, whence it
results that the votes of an assembly only repre-
sent, as a rule, the opinions of a small minority.
The influence of the leaders is due in very small
measure to the arguments they employ, but in a
large degree to their prestige. The best proof of
this is that, should they by any circumstance lose
their prestige, their influence disappears.
The prestige of these political leaders is indi-
vidual, and independent of name or celebrity : a
fact of which M. Jules Simon gives us some very
curious examples in his remarks on the prominent
men of the Assembly of 1848, of which he was a
member : —
" Two months before he was all-powerful, Louis
Napoleon was entirely without the least import-
ance.
" Victor Hugo mounted the tribune. He failed
to achieve success. He was listened to as F^lix
Pyat was listened to, but he did not obtain as
much applause. * I don't like his ideas,' Vaulabelle
said to me, speaking of F6Hx Pyat, * but he is one
of the greatest writers and the greatest orator of
France.' Edgar Quinet, in spite of his exceptional
and powerful intelligence, was held in no esteem
whatever. He had been popular for awhile before
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 209
the opening of the Assembly ; in the Assembly he
had no popularity.
" The splendour of genius makes itself less felt
in political assemblies than anywhere else. They
only give heed to eloquence appropriate to the
time and place and to party services, not to ser-
vices rendered the country. For homage to be
rendered Lamartine in 1848 and Thiers in 1871,
the stimulant was needed of urgent, inexorable
interest. As soon as the danger was passed the
parliamentary world forgot in the same instant its
gratitude and its fright."
I have quoted the preceding passage for the
sake of the facts it contains, not of the explana-
tions it offers, their psychology being somewhat
poor. A crowd would at once lose its character of
a crowd were it to credit its leaders with their
services, whether of a party nature or rendered
their country. The -crowd that obeys a leader is
under the influence of his prestige, and its sub-
mission is not dictated by any sentiment of interest
or gratitude.
In consequence the leader endowed with suffi-
cient prestige wields almost absolute power. The
immense influence exerted during a long series
of years, thanks to his prestige, by a celebrated
Deputy,' beaten at the last general election in con-
' M. Clemenceau. — Note of the Translator.
15
2IO DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
sequence of certain financial events, is well known.
He had only to give the signal and Cabinets were
overthrown. A writer has clearly indicated the
scope of his action in the following lines : —
" It is due, in the main, to M. X that we
paid three times as dearly as we should have done
for Tonkin, that we remained so long on a pre-
carious footing in Madagascar, that we were de-
frauded of an empire in the region of the Lower
Niger, and that we have lost the preponderating
situation we used to occupy in Egypt The
theories of M. X have cost us more territories
than the disasters of Napoleon L"
We must not harbour too bitter a grudge against
the leader in question. It is plain that he has cost
us very dear ; but a great part of his influence was
due to the fact that he followed public opinion,
which, in colonial matters, was far from being at
the time what it has since become. A leader is
/ seldom in advance of public opinion ; almost always
all he does is to follow it and to espouse all its
errors.
The means of persuasion of the leaders we are
dealing with, apart from their prestige, consist in
the factors we have already enumerated several
timesw To make a skUful use of these resources a
leader must have arrived at a comprehension, at
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 211
least in an unconscious manner, of the psychology
of crowds, and must know how to address them.
He should be aware, in particular, of the fascinat-
ing influence of words, phrases, and images. He
should possess a special description of eloquence,
composed of energetic affirmations — ^unburdened
with proofs — ^and impressive images, accompanied
by very summary arguments. This is a kind of
eloquence that is met with in all assemblies, the
English Parliament included, the most serious
though it is of all.
" Debates in the House of Commons," says the
English philosopher Maine, "may be constantly
read in which the entire discussion is confined to
an exchange of rather weak generalities and rather
violent personalities. General formulas of this
description exercise a prodigious influence on the
imagination of a pure democracy. It will always
be easy to make a crowd accept general assertions,
presented in striking terms, although they have
never been verified, and are perhaps not susceptible
of verification."
Too much importance cannot be attached to the
"striking terms" alluded to in the above quotation.
We have already insisted, on several occasions, on
the special power of words and formulas. They
must be chosen in such a way as to evoke very
212 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
vivid images. The following phrase, taken from a
speech by one of the leaders of our assemblies,
affords an excellent example : —
" When the same vessel shall bear away to the
fever-haunted lands of our penitentiary settle-
ments the politician of shady reputation and the
anarchist guilty of murder, the pair will be able to
converse together, and they will appear to each
other as the two complementary aspects of one
and the same state of society."
The image thus evoked is very vivid, and all
the adversaries of the speaker felt themselves
threatened by it They conjured up a double
vision of the fever-haunted country and the vessel
that may carry them away ; for is it not possible
that they are included in the somewhat ill-defined
category of the politicians menaced? They ex-
perienced the lurking fear that the men of the
Convention must have felt whom the vague
speeches of Robespierre threatened with the guil-
lotine, and who, under the influence of this fear,
invariably yielded to him.
It is all to the interest of the leaders to indulsfc
in the most improbable exaggerations. The
speaker of whom I have just cited a sentence
was able to affirm, without arousing violent pro-
testations, that bankers and priests had subsidised
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 213
the throwers of bombs, and that the directors of
the great financial companies deserve the same
punishment as anarchists. Affirmations of this
kind are always effective with crowds. The
affirmation is never too violent, the declamation
never too threatening. Nothing intimidates the
audience more than this sort of eloquence. Those
present are afraid that if they protest they will be
put down as traitors or accomplices.
As I have said, this peculiar style of eloquence
has ever been of sovereign effect in all assemblies.
In times of crisis its power is still further accen-
tuated. The speeches of the great orators of the
assemblies of the French Revolution are very
interesting reading from this point of view. At
every instant they thought themselves obliged to
pause in order to denounce crime and exalt virtue,
after which they would burst forth into impreca-
tions against tyrants, and swear to live free men or
perish. Those present rose to their feet, applauded
furiously, and then, calmed, took their seats ag^n.
On occasion, the leader may be intelligent and
highly educated, but the possession of these
qualities does him, as a rule, more harm than
good. By showing how complex things are, by
allowing of explanation and promoting compre-
hension, intelligence always renders its owner in-
dulgent, and blunts, in a large measure, that
intensity and violence of conviction needful for
214 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS,
apostles. The great leaders of crowds of all ages,
and those of the Revolution in particular, have
been of lamentably narrow intellect; while it is
precisely those whose intelligence has been the
most restricted who have exercised the greatest
influence.
The speeches of the most celebrated of them, of
Robespierre, frequently astound one by their in-
coherence : by merely reading them no plausible
explanation is to be found of the great part played
by the powerful dictator : —
" The commonplaces and redundancies of peda-
gogic eloquence and Latin culture at the service
of a mind childish rather than undistinguished, and
limited in its notions of attack and defence to the
defiant attitude of schoolboys. Not an idea, not
a happy turn of phrase, or a telling hit : a storm
of declamation that leaves us bored. After a dose
of this unexhilarating reading one is 48ttempted
to exclaim * Oh ! * with the amiable Camille
Desmoulins."
It is terrible at times to think of the power that
strong conviction combined with extreme narrow-
ness of mind gives a man possessing prestige. It
is none the less necessary that these conditions
should be satisfied for a man to ignore obstacles
and display strength of will in a high measure.
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 215
Crowds instinctively recognise in men of energy
and conviction the masters they are always in
need of.
In a parliamentary assembly the success of a
speech depends almost solely on the prestige
possessed by the speaker, and not at all on the
arguments he brings forward. The best proof
of this is that when for one cause or another a
speaker loses his prestige, he loses simultaneously
all his influence, that is, his power of influencing
votes at will.
When an unknown speaker comes forward with
a speech containing good arguments, but only
arguments, the chances are that he will only ob-
tain a hearing. A Deputy who is a psychologist
of insight, M. Desaubes, has recently traced in
the following lines the portrait of the Deputy who
lacks prestige : —
" When he takes , his place in the tribune he
draws a document from his portfolio, spreads it
out methodically before him, and makes a start
with assurance.
" He flatters himself that he will implant in the
minds of his audience the conviction by which
he is himself animated. He has weighed and re-
weighed his arguments ; he is well primed with
figures and proofs ; he is certain he will convince
his hearers. In the face of the evidence he is to
2i6 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
adduce all resistance would be futile. He begins,
confident in the justice of his cause, and relying
upon the attention of his colleagues, whose only
anxiety, of course, is to subscribe to the truth.
" He speaks, and is at once surprised at the
restlessness of the House, and a little annoyed by
the noise that is being made.
" How is it silence is not kept ? Why this
general inattention? What are those Deputies
thinking about who are engaged in conversation ?
What urgent motive has induced this or that
Deputy to quit his seat?
" An expression of uneasiness crosses his face ;
he frowns and stops. Encouraged by the Presi-
sident, he begins again, raising his voice. He is
only listened to all the less. He lends emphasis
to his words, and gesticulates : the noise around
him increases. He can no longer hear himself,
and again stops ; finally, afraid that his silence
may provoke the dreaded cry, * The Closure ! '
he starts off again. The clamour becomes un-
bearable."
When parliamentary assemblies reach a certain
pitch of excitement they become identical with
ordinary heterogeneous crowds, and their senti-
ments in consequence present the peculiarity of
being always extreme. They will be seen to
commit acts of the greatest heroism or the worst
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 217
excesses. The individual is no longer himself,
and so entirely is this the case that he will vote
measures most adverse to his personal interests.
The history of the French Revolution shows
to what an extent assemblies are capable of
losing their self-consciousness, and of obeying
suggestions most contrary to their interests. It
was an enormous sacrifice for the nobility to re-
nounce its privileges, yet it did so without hesita-
tion on a famous night during the sittings of the
Constituant Assembly. By renouncing their in-
violability the men of the Convention placed
themselves under a perpetual menace of death,
and yet they took this step, and were not afraid
to decimate their own ranks, though perfectly
aware that the scaffold to which they were send-
ing their colleagues to-day might be their own fate
to-morrow. The truth is they had attained to
that completely automatic state which I have
described elsewhere, and no consideration would
hinder them from yielding to the suggestions by
which they were hypnotised. The following
passage from the memoirs of one of them, Bil-
laud-Varennes, is absolutely typical on this score:
"The decisions with which we have been so re-
proached," he says, " were not desired by us two
daySy a single day before they were taken : it was
the crisis and nothing else that gave rise to them'*
Nothing can be more accurate.
2i8 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS,
The same phenomena of unconsciousness were
to be witnessed during all the stormy sittings of
the Convention.
" They approved and decreed measures," says
Taine, "which they held in horror — measures
which were not only stupid and foolish, but
measures that were crimes — the murder of inno-
cent men, the murder of their friends. The Left,
supported by the Right, unanimously and amid
loud applause, sent to the scaffold Danton, its
natural chief, and the great promoter and leader
of the Revolution. Unanimously and amid the
greatest applause the Right, supported by the
Left, votes the worst decrees of the revolutionary
government Unanimously and amid cries of
admiration and enthusiasm, amid demonstrations
of passionate sympathy for Collot d'Herbois,
Couthon, and Robespierre, the Convention by
spontaneous and repeated re-elections keeps in
office the homicidal government which the Plain
detests because it is homicidal, and the Mountain
detests because it is decimated by it. The Plain
and the Mountain, the majority and the minority,
finish by consenting to help on their own suicide.
The 22 Prairial the entire Convention offered
itself to the executioner ; the 8 Thermidor, during
the first quarter of an hour that followed Robe-
spierre's speech, it did the same thing again."
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES, 219
This picture may appear sombre. Yet it is
accurate. Parliamentary assemblies, sufficiently
excited and hypnotised, offer the same charac-
teristics. They become an unstable flock, obedient
to every impulsion. The following description of
the Assembly of 1848 is due to M. Spuller, a
parliamentarian whose faith in democracy is above
suspicion. I reproduce it from the Revue Ittt&aire,
and it is thoroughly typical. It offers an example
of all the exaggerated sentiments which I have
described as characteristic of crowds, and of that
excessive changeableness which permits of as-
semblies passing, from moment to moment, from
one set of sentiments to another entirely opposite.
" The Republican party was brought to its per-
dition by its divisions, its jealousies, its suspicions,
and, in turn, its blind confidence and its limitless
hopes. Its ingenuousness and candour were only
equalled by its universal mistrust. An absence
of all sense of legality, of all comprehension of
discipline, together with boundless terrors and
illusions ; the peasant and the child are on a level
in these respects. Their calm is as great as their
impatience ; their ferocity is equal to their docility.
This condition is the natural consequence of a
temperament that is not formed and of the lack
of education. Nothing astonishes such persons,
and everything disconcerts them. Trembling with
220 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
fear or brave to the point of heroism, they would
go through fire and water or fly from a shadow.
" They are ignorant of cause and effect and of
the connecting links between events. They are
as promptly discouraged as they are exalted, they
are subject to every description of panic, they are
always either too highly strung or too downcast,
but never in the mood or the measure the situa-
tion would require. More fluid than water they
reflect every line and assume every shape. What
sort of a foundation for a government can they be
expected to supply ? "
Fortunately all the characteristics just described
as to be met with in parliamentary assemblies are
in no wise constantly displayed. Such assemblies
only constitute crowds at certain moments. The
individuals composing them retain their indi-
viduality in a great number of cases, which ex-
plains how it is that an assembly is able to turn
out excellent technical laws. It is true that the
author of these laws is a specialist who has pre-
pared them in the quiet of his study, and that
in reality the law voted is the work of an indi-
vidual and not of an assembly. These laws are
naturally the best. They are only liable to have
disastrous results when a series of amendments
has converted them into the outcome of a collec-
tive effort The work of a crowd is always in-
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 221
ferior, whatever its nature, to that of an isolated
individual. It is specialists who safeguard as-
semblies from passing ill-advised or unworkable
measures. The specialist in this case is a tem-
porary leader of crowds. The Assembly is with-
out influence on him, but he has influence over
the Assembly.
In spite of all the difficulties attending their
working, parliamentary assemblies are the best
form of government mankind has discovered as
yet, and more especially the best means it has
found to escape the yoke of personal tyrannies.
They constitute assuredly the ideal government
at any rate for philosophers, thinkers, writers,
artists, and learned men — in a word, for all those
who form the cream of a civilisation.
Moreover, in reality they only present two
serious dangers, one being inevitable financial
waste, and the other the progressive restriction of
the liberty of the individual.
The first of these dangers is the necessary con-
sequence of the exigencies and want of foresight
of electoral crowds. Should a member of an
assembly propose a measure giving apparent
satisfaction to democratic ideas, should he bring
in a Bill, for instance, to assure old-age pensions
to all workers, and to increase the wages of any
class of State employes, the other Deputies, victims
of suggestion in their dread of their electors, will
222 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
not venture to seem to disregard the interests of
the latter by rejecting the proposed measure, al-
though well aware they are imposing a fresh strain
on the Budget and necessitating the creation of
new taxes. It is impossible for them to hesitate
to give their votes. The consequences of the
increase of expenditure are remote and will not
entail disagreeable consequences for them per-
sonally, while the consequences of a negative
vote might clearly come to light when they next
present themselves for re-election.
In addition to this first cause of an exaggerated
expenditure there is another not less imperative —
the necessity of voting all grants for local purposes.
A Deputy is unable to oppose grants of this kind
because they represent once more the exigencies
of the electors, and because each individual Deputy
can only obtain what he requires for his own con-
stituency on the condition of acceding to similar
demands on the part of his colleagues.'
' In its issue of April 6, 1895, the Economiste published
a curious review of the figures that may be reached by
expenditure caused solely by electoral considerations, and
notably of the outlay on railways. To put Langayes (a
town of 3,000 inhabitants, situated on a mountain) in com-
munication with Puy, a railway is voted that will cost 15
millions of francs. Seven millions are to be spent to put
Beaumont (3,500 inhabitants) in communication with Castel-
Sarrazin ; 7 millions to put Oust (a village of 523 inhabi-
tants) in communication with Seix (1,200 inhabitants) ; 6
millions to put Prade in communication with the hamlet
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 223
The second of the dangers referred to above —
the inevitable restrictions on liberty consummated
by parliamentary assemblies — is apparently less
obvious, but is, nevertheless, very real. It is the
result of the innumerable laws — having always a
restrictive action — which parliaments consider
themselves obliged to vote and to whose conse-
quences, owing to their shortsightedness, they are
in a great measure blind.
The danger must indeed be most inevitable,
since even England itself, which assuredly offers
of Olette (747 inhabitants), &c. In 1895 alone 90 millions
of francs were voted for railways of only local utility. There
is other no less important expenditure necessitated also by
electioneering considerations. The law instituting working-
men's pensions will soon involve a minimum annual outlay
of 165 millions, according to the Minister of Finance, and
of 800 millions according to the academician M. Leroy-
Beaulieu. It is evident that the continued growth of
expenditure of this kind must end in bankruptcy. Many
European countries — Portugal, Greece, Spain, Turkey —
have reached this stage, and others, such as Italy, will soon
be reduced to the same extremity. Still too much alarm
need not be felt at this state of things, since the public has
successively consented to put up with the reduction of four-
fifths in the payment of their coupons by these different
countries. Bankruptcy under these ingenious conditions
allows the equilibrium of Budgets difficult to balance to be
instantly restored. Moreover, wars, socialism, and economic
conflicts hold in store for us a profusion of other catas-
trophes in the period of universal disintegration we are
traversing, and it is necessary to be resigned to living from
hand to mouth without too much concern for a future we
cannot control.
\\^
224 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
the most popular type of the parliamentary rigime^
the type in which the representative is most
independent of his elector, has been unable to
escape it Herbert Spencer has shown, in a work
already old, that the increase of apparent liberty
must needs be followed by the decrease of real
liberty. Returning to this contention in his recent
book, " The Individual versus the State," he thus
expresses himself with regard to the English Par-
liament : —
"Legislation since this period has followed the
course I pointed out Rapidly multiplying dicta-
torial measures have continually tended to restrict
individual liberties, and this in two ways. Regula-
tions have been established every year in greater
number, imposing a constraint on the citizen in
matters in which his acts were formerly completely
free, and forcing him to accomplish acts which he
was formerly at liberty to accomplish or not to
accomplish at will. At the same time heavier and
heavier public, and especially local, burdens have
still further restricted his liberty by diminishing
the portion of his profits he can spend as he chooses,
and by augmenting the portion which is taken from
him to be spent according to the good pleasure of
the public authorities."
This progressive restriction of liberties shows
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 225
itself in every country in a special shape which
Herbert Spencer has not pointed out; it is that
the passing of these innumerable series of legislative
measures, all of them in a general way of a restric-
tive order, conduces necessarily to augment the
number, the power, and the influence of the func-
tionaries charged with their application. These
functionaries tend in this way to become the
veritable masters of civilised countries. Their
power is all the greater owing to the fact that,
amidst the incessant transfer of authority, the
administrative caste is alone in being untouched
by these changes, is alone in possessing irrespon-
sibility, impersonality, and perpetuity. There is
no more oppressive despotism than that which
presents itself under this triple form.
This incessant creation of restrictive laws and
regulations, surrounding the pettiest actions of
existence with the most complicated formalities,
inevitably has for its result the confining within
narrower and narrower limits of the sphere in
which the citizen may move freely. Victims of
the delusion that equality and liberty are the better
assured by the multiplication of laws, nations daily
consent to put up with trammels increasingly bur-
densome. They do not accept this legislation with
impunity. Accustomed to put up with every yoke,
they soon end by desiring servitude, and lose all
spontaneousness and energy. They are then no
16
226 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
more than vain shadows, passive, unresisting and
powerless automata.
Arrived at this point, the individual is bound to
seek outside himself the forces he no longer finds
within him. The functions of governments neces-
trily increase in proportion as the indifference and
Iplessness of the citizens grow. They it is who
must necessarily exhibit the initiative, enterprising,
and guiding spirit in which private persons are
lacking. It falls on them to undertake everything,
direct everything, and take everything under their
protection. The State becomes an all-powerful
god. Still experience shows that the power of
such gods was never either very durable or very
strong.
This progressive restriction of all liberties in the
case of certain peoples, in spite of an outward license
that gives them the illusion that these liberties are
still in their possession, seems at least as much a
consequence of their old age as of any particular
system. It constitutes one of the precursory
symptoms of that decadent phase which up to
now no civilisation has escaped.
Judging by the lessons of the past, and by the
symptoms that strike the attention on every side,
several of our modern civilisations have reached
that phase of extreme old age which precedes
decadence. It seems inevitable that all peoples
should pass through identical phases of existence.
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES. 227
since history is so often seen to repeat its
course.
It is easy to note briefly these common phases
of the evolution of civilisations, and I shall terminate
this work with a summary of them. This rapid
sketch will perhaps throw some gleams of light
on the causes of the power at present wielded by
crowds.
If we examine in their main lines the genesis
of the greatness and of the fall of the civilisations
that preceded our own, what do we see ?
At the dawn of civilisation a swarm of men
of various origin, brought together by the chances
of migrations, invasions, and conquests. Of diffe-
rent blood, and of equally different languages and
beliefs, the only com mon bond of union between
these men is the half-recognised law of a ^hief.
The psychological characteristics of crowds are
present in an eminent degree in these confused
agglomerations. They have the transient cohesion
of crowds^ their heroism, their weaknesses, their
impulsiveness, and their violence. Nothing is
stable in connection with them. They are bar-
barians.
At length time accomplishes its work. The
identity of surroundings, the repeated intermingling
of races, the necessities of life in common exert their
influence. The assemblage of dissimilar units b^^s
228 DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
to blend into a whole, to form a race ; that is, an
aggregate possessing common characteristics and
sentiments to which heredity will give greater and
g^reater fixity. The crowd has become a people,
and this people is able to emerge from its barbarous
state. However, it will only entirely emerge there-
from when, after long efforts, struggles necessarily
repeated, and innumerable recommencements, it
shall have acquired an ideal. The nature of this
ideal is of slight importance; whether it be the
cult of Rome, the might of Athens, or the triumph
of Allah, it will suffice to endow all the individuals
of the race that is forming with perfect unity of
sentiment and thought.
At this stage a new civilisation, with its institu-
tions, its beliefs, and its arts, may be bom. In
pursuit of Its ideal, the race will acquire in succes-
sion the qualities necessary to give it splendour,
vigour, and grandeur. At times no doubt it will
still be a crowd, but henceforth, beneath the mobile
and changing characteristics of crowds, is found a
solid substratum, the genius of the race which con-
fines within narrow limits the transformations of
a nation and overrules the play of chance.
After having exerted its creative action, time
begins that work of destruction from which neither
^gods nor men escape. Having reached a certain
level of strength and complexity a civilisation
ceases to grow, and having ceased to grow it is
PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLIES, 229
condemned to a speedy decline. The hour of its
old age has struck.
This inevitable hour is always marked by the
weakening of the ideal that was the mainstay of
the race. In proportion as this ideal pales all the
religious, political, and social structures inspired by
it begin to be shaken.
With the progressive perishing of its ideal the
race loses more and more the qualities that lent it
Its cohesion, its unity, and its strength. The person-
ality and intelligence of the individual may increase,
but at the same time this collective egoism of the
race is replaced by an excessive development of
the egoism of the individual, accompanied by a
weakening of character and a lessening of the
capacity for action. What constituted a people,
a unity, a whole, becomes in the end an agglomera-
tion of individualities lacking cohesion, and arti-
ficially held together for a time bJH' its traditions
and institutions. It is at this stagb ^that men,
divided by their interests and aspiratiStis, and
incapable any longer of self-government, r^uye
directing in their pettiest acts, and that the State
exerts an absorbing influence.
With the definite loss of its old ideal the genius
of the race entirely disappears ; it is a mere swarm
of isolated individuals and returns to its original
state — that of a crowd. Without consistency and
without a future, it has all the transitory charac-
230
DIFFERENT KINDS OF CROWDS.
teristics of crowds. Its civilisation is now without
stability, and at the mercy of every chance. The
populace is sovereign, and the tide of barbarism
mounts. The civilisati<»i may still seem brilliant
because it possesses an outward front, the work of
a loi^ past, but it is in reality an edifice crumbling
to ruin, which nothing supports, and destined to fall
in at the iirst storm.
To pass in pursuit of an ideaJ from the barbarous
to the civilised state, and then, when this ideal has
lost its virtue, to decline and die, such is the cycle
of the life of a people
■^L^..-— ^^
r3
3 bVas i□^ ^^4 302
STANFORD UNIVERSITY LIBRARIE
STANFORD AUXILIARY LIBRARY
STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305-6004
(415) 723-9201
All books may be recalled after 7 di
004 I
DATE DUE
■^
W ja 2*1996
Jti^^^^zooi
«wu
,m
OCT1»2(|03
MAR 3 Mm
\
NOV 8 2005
Live Music
Archive
Librivox
Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland
Museum of Art
Internet
Arcade
Console Living Room
Open Library
American
Libraries
TV News
Understanding
9/11